Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: None at the moment, presently a windows user.
Posts: 11
Rep:
Red Hat Linux 5.2 problem during install.
This is regarding Red Hat Linux 5.2.
I get the following error messages:
Cannot open root device 08:22 and
Kernel Panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 08:22
Additionally dropping in an error message is not enough. Would be better to explain what are you trying to achieve, on which hardware and what [step] caused that error message.
RHL 5.2 was 32 bit, and likely does not have support for most of the hardware in your system. I am reasonably sure it only supported IDE drive interfaces and likely will not function with a SATA drive controller. I could not even get RHL 6 to function in a VM when I tried recently.
Why are you trying to install such an old and unsupported OS?
Have you tried putting the error messages into a search engine yet?
I am trying to install it on an IBM Thinkcentre S50 with 1 GByte of RAM, both Hard Drive and DVD are SATA, though they can be on a IDE cable too. The DVD works fine on the SATA. I know it is an old version of Red Hat Linux but I had to start somewhere. Pity it just can't start setting up the partitions by itself as some distros did. It appears I have to set up the partitions myself. I had a swap partition of nearly 400 MBytes, and the rest split in half for root and data. If it is unsupported, it there a Red Hat version which is supported and still works on a 32bit system?
Last edited by linuxfan54; 02-01-2022 at 06:51 AM.
Distribution: None at the moment, presently a windows user.
Posts: 11
Original Poster
Rep:
Install CD
Quote:
Originally Posted by pan64
Additionally dropping in an error message is not enough. Would be better to explain what are you trying to achieve, on which hardware and what [step] caused that error message.
The hardware is an IBM Thinkcentre with 1 GByte of RAM and one TB hard drive. I thought, let's marry Red Hat and IBM as they are doing it already.
If it is unsupported, it there a Red Hat version which is supported and still works on a 32bit system?
There are no supported version of Red Hat Linux since 2003/2004.
It was succeeded by Red Hat Enterprise Linux - RHEL - and Fedora.
RHEL has two supported versions, 7 and 8, which I suspect are 64-bit only. (Someone with a Red Hat Subscription could probably confirm if 32-bit downloads are available.)
Likewise, given Fedora's rapid release cycle, I doubt they still maintain a 32-bit edition.
DistroWatch search identifies two potential distros, both based on RHEL - Scientific Linux 6 (equivalent to RHEL6) appears to be the last 32-bit version available, whilst Springdale Linux appears to offer 32-bit for v7.
However, support doesn't matter if you're just playing around (and assuming you're not planning to put the machine online), so since the IBM Thinkcentre S50 appears to be a 2003 machine, maybe you should try either Red Hat Linux v9 or RHEL v3, which presumably have a better chance of supporting that specific hardware.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.