LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-31-2022, 07:19 AM   #1
linuxfan54
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2018
Location: Armathwaite, Carlisle, Cumbria, UK
Distribution: None at the moment, presently a windows user.
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Red Hat Linux 5.2 problem during install.


This is regarding Red Hat Linux 5.2.
I get the following error messages:
Cannot open root device 08:22 and
Kernel Panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 08:22
 
Old 01-31-2022, 07:23 AM   #2
boughtonp
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 3,616

Rep: Reputation: 2554Reputation: 2554Reputation: 2554Reputation: 2554Reputation: 2554Reputation: 2554Reputation: 2554Reputation: 2554Reputation: 2554Reputation: 2554Reputation: 2554
Quote:
Originally Posted by linuxfan54 View Post
This is regarding Red Hat Linux 5.2.
The one released in 1998!?

Why are you trying to install such an old and unsupported OS?

Have you tried putting the error messages into a search engine yet?


Last edited by boughtonp; 01-31-2022 at 07:25 AM.
 
Old 01-31-2022, 11:52 AM   #3
pan64
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Hungary
Distribution: debian/ubuntu/suse ...
Posts: 21,930

Rep: Reputation: 7320Reputation: 7320Reputation: 7320Reputation: 7320Reputation: 7320Reputation: 7320Reputation: 7320Reputation: 7320Reputation: 7320Reputation: 7320Reputation: 7320
Additionally dropping in an error message is not enough. Would be better to explain what are you trying to achieve, on which hardware and what [step] caused that error message.
 
Old 01-31-2022, 01:59 PM   #4
computersavvy
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,345

Rep: Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484Reputation: 1484
RHL 5.2 was 32 bit, and likely does not have support for most of the hardware in your system. I am reasonably sure it only supported IDE drive interfaces and likely will not function with a SATA drive controller. I could not even get RHL 6 to function in a VM when I tried recently.
 
Old 02-01-2022, 05:23 AM   #5
knudfl
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Copenhagen DK
Distribution: PCLinuxOS2023 Fedora38 + 50+ other Linux OS, for test only.
Posts: 17,513

Rep: Reputation: 3641Reputation: 3641Reputation: 3641Reputation: 3641Reputation: 3641Reputation: 3641Reputation: 3641Reputation: 3641Reputation: 3641Reputation: 3641Reputation: 3641
It could be about "Redhat Enterprise Linux 5.2": RHEL 5.2 (released 2008-05-21.)

The latest version was rhel 5.11 / CentOS 5.11 (2014-09-16.)
 
Old 02-01-2022, 05:25 AM   #6
evo2
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Japan
Distribution: Mostly Debian and CentOS
Posts: 6,724

Rep: Reputation: 1705Reputation: 1705Reputation: 1705Reputation: 1705Reputation: 1705Reputation: 1705Reputation: 1705Reputation: 1705Reputation: 1705Reputation: 1705Reputation: 1705
Needing something to replace Windows 95?
 
Old 02-01-2022, 06:50 AM   #7
linuxfan54
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2018
Location: Armathwaite, Carlisle, Cumbria, UK
Distribution: None at the moment, presently a windows user.
Posts: 11

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by boughtonp View Post
The one released in 1998!?

Why are you trying to install such an old and unsupported OS?

Have you tried putting the error messages into a search engine yet?

I am trying to install it on an IBM Thinkcentre S50 with 1 GByte of RAM, both Hard Drive and DVD are SATA, though they can be on a IDE cable too. The DVD works fine on the SATA. I know it is an old version of Red Hat Linux but I had to start somewhere. Pity it just can't start setting up the partitions by itself as some distros did. It appears I have to set up the partitions myself. I had a swap partition of nearly 400 MBytes, and the rest split in half for root and data. If it is unsupported, it there a Red Hat version which is supported and still works on a 32bit system?

Last edited by linuxfan54; 02-01-2022 at 06:51 AM.
 
Old 02-01-2022, 06:53 AM   #8
linuxfan54
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2018
Location: Armathwaite, Carlisle, Cumbria, UK
Distribution: None at the moment, presently a windows user.
Posts: 11

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Install CD

Quote:
Originally Posted by pan64 View Post
Additionally dropping in an error message is not enough. Would be better to explain what are you trying to achieve, on which hardware and what [step] caused that error message.
The hardware is an IBM Thinkcentre with 1 GByte of RAM and one TB hard drive. I thought, let's marry Red Hat and IBM as they are doing it already.
 
Old 02-01-2022, 07:19 AM   #9
shruggy
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2020
Posts: 3,670

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
antiX would be a good fit for hardware released around 2003.
 
Old 02-01-2022, 07:26 AM   #10
boughtonp
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 3,616

Rep: Reputation: 2554Reputation: 2554Reputation: 2554Reputation: 2554Reputation: 2554Reputation: 2554Reputation: 2554Reputation: 2554Reputation: 2554Reputation: 2554Reputation: 2554
Quote:
Originally Posted by linuxfan54 View Post
If it is unsupported, it there a Red Hat version which is supported and still works on a 32bit system?
There are no supported version of Red Hat Linux since 2003/2004.

It was succeeded by Red Hat Enterprise Linux - RHEL - and Fedora.

RHEL has two supported versions, 7 and 8, which I suspect are 64-bit only. (Someone with a Red Hat Subscription could probably confirm if 32-bit downloads are available.)
Likewise, given Fedora's rapid release cycle, I doubt they still maintain a 32-bit edition.

DistroWatch search identifies two potential distros, both based on RHEL - Scientific Linux 6 (equivalent to RHEL6) appears to be the last 32-bit version available, whilst Springdale Linux appears to offer 32-bit for v7.

However, support doesn't matter if you're just playing around (and assuming you're not planning to put the machine online), so since the IBM Thinkcentre S50 appears to be a 2003 machine, maybe you should try either Red Hat Linux v9 or RHEL v3, which presumably have a better chance of supporting that specific hardware.

 
Old 02-07-2022, 06:31 AM   #11
linuxfan54
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2018
Location: Armathwaite, Carlisle, Cumbria, UK
Distribution: None at the moment, presently a windows user.
Posts: 11

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Once I get my next batch of blank CDs I will give Springdale a try.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Red Hat powers cloud-scale DevOps with the general availability of Red Hat Cloud Suite and Red Hat OpenStack Platform 8 LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-20-2016 04:20 PM
During Red Hat Linux 9 install: error "No devices found to install Red Hat Linux" rbradtx Linux - Newbie 11 06-25-2010 04:55 PM
Install RED HAT 9 = cant find red hat CD voodooutt Red Hat 7 11-18-2003 05:37 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:51 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration