Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
this would tell you that subdirA contains 13% of the total of ~/dir-to-measure. I occasionally need something like this to find out what's taking up so much space on a disk. Any help?
I doubt it does any caching between invocations. However, a lot of the file system metadata loaded by du should still be in the buffer cache, so depending on how many files you have under that directory, two runs of du might still execute pretty quickly.
OK. I wouldn't have referred to a run of du as
a calculation. I suppose if you were concerned
with running du twice (and no, it doesn't cache,
but your file-system most likely does) you could
use a different approach, e.g. run du ones, stick
the results in an array with awk, add them up, and
then calculate the percentages on a second run.
also introduced the sort -g command as suggested by Tinkster. Furthermore I substituted the gawk statements with cut to manage directories containing blank spaces in their name, by extracting from the second field to the end of the line:
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.