LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-13-2014, 04:49 PM   #31
rokytnji
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Waaaaay out West Texas
Distribution: antiX 23, MX 23
Posts: 7,143
Blog Entries: 21

Rep: Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480

Quote:
Originally Posted by LinBox2013 View Post
The deb is about as easy as it gets. I know how to install and run seamonkey from opt in my AntiX installs since Debian does not support Iceape anymore so I use the .bz2 download.

But the deb is there if you wanna use gdebi instead to install it.

http://www.imagebam.com/image/85c0da320665439
 
Old 04-14-2014, 03:53 PM   #32
Yuhan
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 374

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 3
Okay, here is what I have done--with no success! I downloaded Seamonkey from the website. I opened the tarball using the Archive Manager included with Xubuntu. I took that folder called Seamonkey and then placed it in another folder called "Apps" which is in my Home folder. At that point I figured the OS would know what to do and simply open the program. It did not. Sooo...now that I have the browser downloaded, tarball uncompressed, and a Seamonkey file in my Home folder, why doesn't it work? What do I need to do at this point to launch the browser? I apologize for carrying this on but I don't have the tech savvy of some of you. I'm just trying to get this up and running. Thanks for your assistance and support!
 
Old 04-14-2014, 04:13 PM   #33
LinBox2013
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2013
Location: Southern Kentucky
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 119

Rep: Reputation: 45
Why we talking abut tarballs when I posted a link that gives the seamonkey packages for Ubuntu?

That means that he can simply double click the file and the nice graphical package manager would handle everything for him

This is why people run away screaming from Linux. Everyone wants to lead someone on a compile journey when it is much easier to point that person to a package for their distribution. This poor guy is probably pulling his hair out for no needed reason...
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-14-2014, 06:07 PM   #34
sag47
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Distribution: Ubuntu, PopOS, Raspbian
Posts: 1,899
Blog Entries: 36

Rep: Reputation: 477Reputation: 477Reputation: 477Reputation: 477Reputation: 477
Quote:
Originally Posted by LinBox2013 View Post
Why we talking abut tarballs when I posted a link that gives the seamonkey packages for Ubuntu?

That means that he can simply double click the file and the nice graphical package manager would handle everything for him

This is why people run away screaming from Linux. Everyone wants to lead someone on a compile journey when it is much easier to point that person to a package for their distribution. This poor guy is probably pulling his hair out for no needed reason...
See first reply in this thread .

Last edited by sag47; 04-14-2014 at 06:09 PM.
 
Old 04-14-2014, 06:49 PM   #35
Yuhan
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 374

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 3
Ha! Ha! No offense taken by anyone, please! I appreciate all these good efforts and it's definitely a learning process. I appreciate what LinBox2013 is saying about compiling. On the other hand, that's the "purist's" way of working. I have a friend who has used Slackware from the very beginning and he still swears by it! That is all about package compiling, and he insists there are advantages to it...when you know what you're doing. What do they say?..."When you know Slackware you know Linux"? So there must be advantages to working that way, but they are still beyond me. So if I go to that Sourceforge.net site do I download the very first program on the list? (The current version of Seamonkey is 2.25 and the top two are listed as such. One has a bit more info on it than the other.) When you say choose whether you have a 32 or 64 bit platform, how do I determine that? I have Xubuntu...thanks again for patience and clarity beyond the call of duty!
 
Old 04-14-2014, 06:53 PM   #36
rokytnji
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Waaaaay out West Texas
Distribution: antiX 23, MX 23
Posts: 7,143
Blog Entries: 21

Rep: Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480
Quote:
how do I determine that
Code:
uname -a
reveals all.
 
Old 04-14-2014, 06:55 PM   #37
sag47
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Distribution: Ubuntu, PopOS, Raspbian
Posts: 1,899
Blog Entries: 36

Rep: Reputation: 477Reputation: 477Reputation: 477Reputation: 477Reputation: 477
Yuhan, you must download the right package for your system. If you're using 32bit Linux then download the i386 package. If you have 64bit Linux then download the amd64 package. If you don't know whether you have 32bit or 64bit then open the terminal and type the following command.

Code:
uname -rms
Give us the output and we'll tell you which you have. Usually 64bit systems are designated with x86_64.
 
Old 04-14-2014, 07:45 PM   #38
LinBox2013
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2013
Location: Southern Kentucky
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 119

Rep: Reputation: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuhan View Post
Ha! Ha! No offense taken by anyone, please! I appreciate all these good efforts and it's definitely a learning process. I appreciate what LinBox2013 is saying about compiling. On the other hand, that's the "purist's" way of working. I have a friend who has used Slackware from the very beginning and he still swears by it! That is all about package compiling, and he insists there are advantages to it...when you know what you're doing. What do they say?..."When you know Slackware you know Linux"? So there must be advantages to working that way, but they are still beyond me. So if I go to that Sourceforge.net site do I download the very first program on the list? (The current version of Seamonkey is 2.25 and the top two are listed as such. One has a bit more info on it than the other.) When you say choose whether you have a 32 or 64 bit platform, how do I determine that? I have Xubuntu...thanks again for patience and clarity beyond the call of duty!
Slackware is different beast then Ubuntu. I have used both and in slackware you pretty much want to compile or use slackbuilds. In Ubuntu not so much. You pretty much want everything removable by the package manager. Also you want the package manager aware of what you install for the greater good. Slackware has a package manager but it does no dependency checking. So that package manager does not care what you install. It is much easier to use slackbuilds however because this compiles in a way the package manager understands.

Hope my little lesson makes sense
 
Old 04-15-2014, 11:02 AM   #39
Yuhan
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 374

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 3
Okay...here is the output that was received from the above command:

Linux 3.2.0-60-generic x86_64

So from this when I go to the Sourceforge.net site, which of the
links there do I select to receive the proper installer? It feels
like I may be on the home stretch here! Thanks
 
Old 04-15-2014, 11:06 AM   #40
rokytnji
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Waaaaay out West Texas
Distribution: antiX 23, MX 23
Posts: 7,143
Blog Entries: 21

Rep: Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuhan View Post
Okay...here is the output that was received from the above command:

Linux 3.2.0-60-generic x86_64

So from this when I go to the Sourceforge.net site, which of the
links there do I select to receive the proper installer? It feels
like I may be on the home stretch here! Thanks
The very first download link was what my screenshot shows is the link you want.

If you get the same download window as in my screenshot in

http://www.imagebam.com/image/85c0da320665439

You got the right one.
 
Old 04-15-2014, 12:20 PM   #41
Yuhan
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 374

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 3
Then when it asks me where I want to save it, what is the best place so that it is recognized by the OS?
 
Old 04-15-2014, 01:05 PM   #42
snowday
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,667

Rep: Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuhan View Post
Then when it asks me where I want to save it, what is the best place so that it is recognized by the OS?
Anyplace where you will remember where you put it. The "Downloads" folder is a popular destination for downloads.
 
Old 04-15-2014, 01:27 PM   #43
Yuhan
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 374

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 3
This is interesting: as I tried to install the Mozilla opener a flag came up that said "Program is of bad quality. It cannot be installed without permission--it may contain harmful information." What is that?? The Seamonkey program still came in as a tarball and I was in the process of installing the launcher when I received that message. I didn't want to continue with the install with that ominous warning!
 
Old 04-15-2014, 01:34 PM   #44
rokytnji
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Waaaaay out West Texas
Distribution: antiX 23, MX 23
Posts: 7,143
Blog Entries: 21

Rep: Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480Reputation: 3480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuhan View Post
This is interesting: as I tried to install the Mozilla opener a flag came up that said "Program is of bad quality. It cannot be installed without permission--it may contain harmful information." What is that?? The Seamonkey program still came in as a tarball and I was in the process of installing the launcher when I received that message. I didn't want to continue with the install with that ominous warning!


Code:
# ls
AOA150-version3310.zip  seamonkey-mozilla-build_2.25-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb
FLASHIT.EXE             ZG5IA32.fd
READ ME!!!!!!!!.txt
Just downloaded in my Puppy install. It's a .deb

Not sure what you mean?
 
Old 04-15-2014, 01:37 PM   #45
Yuhan
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Posts: 374

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 3
I found this, for what it is worth. It urges caution.

http://www.gluster.org/2013/08/how-f...ge-has-fallen/
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Ubuntu 13.04 Is No Longer Supported, Upgrade to Ubuntu 13.10 Now LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-27-2014 11:20 AM
Keep using a distro that is no longer supported GiddyUpDonut Linux - Software 20 11-09-2012 06:07 PM
LXer: Ubuntu 11.04 Is No Longer Supported LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-30-2012 03:50 AM
Longer Supported Fedora Replacement cmnorton Red Hat 4 03-07-2008 08:17 AM
kdesu No Longer Supported in FC5 Wheat_Thins Linux - Software 2 04-14-2006 01:45 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:40 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration