Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
What are you trying to achieve, and how are you
trying to do this? Give's the complete syntax and
a few bits and pieces of what the directory structure
looks like, and what you want to get rid of.
where it forces the path to have "logs" and skips "snapshots"...the problem being, I have a huge amount of data, and ./snapshots contains duplicates snapshots of the data every hour. So I don't want to traverse that directory, since it contains 5 times the amount of the original file tree.
Hmmmm ... if the "*/logs/*" is to force one directory,
why don't you just
find ./logs -maxdepth 4 -a \( -path "./snapshots/*" -prune \)
or something to that effect? Would make it quite clear,
and probably slightly less costly ...
./foo/logs/
./foo2/logs/
./foo3/logs/
./snapshot/hourly/foo/logs, etc. etc.
./snapshot/hourly.1/foo/logs, etc. etc.
./snapshot/hourly.4/foo/logs, etc. etc.
I have 582 "foo" directories, inwhich I want to find all log files. Skipping ./snapshots would make the search faster.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.