Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I recently did a system upgrade which included Firefox 3.6 The first issue was that it simply would not open with the existing profile. Deleting (hiding with a new name) the .mozilla folder solved that---then the question was how to get my old bookmarks. I solved it by using the "import from html" option under the "manage bookmarks" utility.
In the process I found that FF3.6 creates it's own bookmarks.html file but does not appear to use it for anything. New bookmarks go into "places.sqlite" Looking at some related threads suggests that this is actually not new in FF3.6.
First it seems odd that this Firefox "upgrade" would not at least import key items from the old profile(s). Also, I have the impression that FF has evolved into something excessively complex.
I have tried Google chrome and was favorably impressed.
Was your upgrade of firefox distribution based or direct from mozilla ? I've not had issues with distro based upgrades, but plenty with mozilla. Even using firefox to update itself has resulted in problems, most recently not even starting after installation. I have had to go back to my old version.
I think the bookmarks.html file is a placeholder for the Export bookmarks to html menu option.
Not tried chrome. Google have too many fingers in the pie IMHO.
I might try chromium if I hear enough favourable reports.
Interesting what you say about "bookmarks.html" I have never done **anything** to cause a write to that file (eg I have never before even opened the "manage bookmarks" utility. But all my old bookmarks were in that file...
Why the animosity towards Google---don't we need some serious competition for MS?
Interesting what you say about "bookmarks.html" I have never done **anything** to cause a write to that file (eg I have never before even opened the "manage bookmarks" utility. But all my old bookmarks were in that file...
Why the animosity towards Google---don't we need some serious competition for MS?
The older versions used to use that file, the newer versions don't.
I have no animosity towards google. I just don't like having one person controlling too many factors.
Competition for MS is one thing, replacing one behemoth with another is silly.
Always remember that google has one main product - you.
Your data is their currency with advertisers.
The only way to opt out of their incessant data gathering is to avoid letting them see your data.
Plus there's the whole China situation where they caved in to the Chinese Govt.s demands.
If they can do that in China, who's to say they won't or aren't doing it elsewhere.
Network security is all about minimum necessary exposure, and I for one like to have as much control as I can over my online profile. Trusting google is anathema to that ideal.
But that's just me.
I use gmail, and have a domain that uses gmail for transport. Any sensitive content is encrypted though.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6
works just fine here. I have been updating it using the built in update feature since firefox 2.0 with very few issues.
You want to switch to Slackware . The official 3.6 release works OK, including automatically imported bookmarks from the old version. Get Slack - you know it makes sense.
In case anyone is interested, bookmarks.html still works perfectly fine on my FF 3.6 installation, at least in so far as importing/exporting bookmarks (so I don't know how/when/if FF itself actually uses the file on its own, unless I tell it to when restoring/backing-up); bookmarks.html it is my preferred choice for exporting my bookmarks, and is also (as should be obvious) the format I use when importing my saved bookmarks from a FEBE backup (like if for example my profile gets blown all to hell, and I restore everything from a FEBE backup).
You want to switch to Slackware . The official 3.6 release works OK, including automatically imported bookmarks from the old version. Get Slack - you know it makes sense.
To you maybe.....
Seriously, I'm having trouble seeing how the Arch version could screw up something so fundamental as import of settings. In the Arch forums, they make reference to 3.6 having issues.
Anyhow, all is working now, and getting to the bottom of this one is going to have to wait for income tax and other 2009 closeout chores (groan)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.