LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-14-2012, 01:11 AM   #1
Piyush M
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Maharashtra,India
Distribution: mint 18.2
Posts: 125

Rep: Reputation: 6
dual boot or virtual box...


I am currently having windows 7 installed on my laptop.
320 G HDD, 2 G ram, 2.2 Ghz, ddr3, core 2 duo.
I have downloaded 3 iso cds of debian 6, now the problem is that I am very confused about installing debian.

Either install debian in windows or windows in debian ?

Either dual boot them or use virtual box ?

If virtual box should be better then Should I format my laptop and install debian 6 using entire disk and then install virtual box in it and then install windows 7 in virtual box?

or

I should keep my current windows as it is and directly install debian in virtual box..?

I didn't ever used virtual box so I am new bee in this field.
 
Old 06-14-2012, 01:57 AM   #2
Doc CPU
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Distribution: Mint, Debian, Gentoo, Win 2k/XP
Posts: 1,099

Rep: Reputation: 344Reputation: 344Reputation: 344Reputation: 344
Hi there,

Quote:
Originally Posted by Piyush M View Post
Either install debian in windows or windows in debian ?
Either dual boot them or use virtual box ?
that's entirely up to you. You should ask yourself the questions:
  1. Do you need both systems (Debian/Win7) running at the same time, so they can communicate with each other?
    If yes, that rules a dual-boot configuration out and calls for using a VM instead.
    If no, I'd rather recommend a dual-boot setup where each system can use the full system resources (memory, CPU).
  2. If the answer to the previous question was "yes":
    Which of the two systems (Debian/Win7) will you be using most of the time?
    Choose that as the primary system, and put the other one in a VM.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Piyush M View Post
I should keep my current windows as it is and directly install debian in virtual box..?
That's a different aspect: If you have a fully functional Windows installation, why knock it over? That might be another point for keeping the Windows installation intact, install VirtualBox on Windows, and then Debian in the VM.

[X] Doc CPU
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-14-2012, 04:08 AM   #3
EDDY1
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Location: Oakland,Ca
Distribution: wins7, Debian wheezy
Posts: 6,841

Rep: Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649
I'd say with only 2gigs ram to dual-boot, as a vm will require atleast 512mb ram slowing the machine down.

Last edited by EDDY1; 06-14-2012 at 04:10 AM.
 
Old 06-14-2012, 05:52 AM   #4
Piyush M
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Maharashtra,India
Distribution: mint 18.2
Posts: 125

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 6
I didnt undertood you answer.
 
Old 06-14-2012, 01:33 PM   #5
deathsfriend99
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Distribution: CentOS 6
Posts: 200

Rep: Reputation: 22
My 2 cents. I prefer the VBox solution for a couple reasons.
1) I find that I want/need to interact with both OS's at the same time quite often.
2) I feel that it is slightly harder on the wear and tear of hardware to constantly reboot. (although this may be in my head)

A lean Linux install should run fine with that config, but I would be more concerned with attempting to run Win7 with 2GB of RAM. Even without the virtual environment, that's pushing the capabilities of the laptop.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-14-2012, 01:45 PM   #6
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware64 15; SlackwareARM-current (aarch64); Debian 12
Posts: 8,299
Blog Entries: 61

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
If you can afford it, and your motherboard can take it, add more RAM.
 
Old 06-14-2012, 02:30 PM   #7
EDDY1
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Location: Oakland,Ca
Distribution: wins7, Debian wheezy
Posts: 6,841

Rep: Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDDY1 View Post
I'd say with only 2gigs ram to dual-boot, as a vm will require atleast 512mb ram slowing the machine down.
2Gigs of memory is kind of low most os"es installed to vb. Vb will takeup atleast 25% of your memory & run quite slow.

Last edited by EDDY1; 06-14-2012 at 02:32 PM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] virtual box failed to boot after kernel update digsecurity Linux - Virtualization and Cloud 2 06-24-2010 05:23 AM
Is dual boot still possible with Sun Virtual Box? beckettisdogg Linux - Newbie 19 12-03-2009 11:27 PM
Running virtual pc files in a virtual machine in linux ... preferably virtual box biharibong Linux - Software 4 01-21-2009 01:04 PM
Converting a Dual Boot Box and Network Into Virtual Machines Woodsman Slackware 2 04-18-2008 10:28 PM
Is it better on dual boot,trible boot,quad boot rather than virtual machines? pleasehelpme Linux - Newbie 3 12-15-2007 12:04 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration