Linux - ServerThis forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi! I've been the admin of a Qmail/Vpopmail mail server for a few years now and I'm looking to move the mail server to a new box. I'm building the box now and am looking to install a more current and feature rich version of Qmail. I've used some part of QmailToaster in the past but couldn't get it working as I wanted. Maybe going with QmailToaster from start to finish might result in greater success.
My question is this: Which Qmail install procedure/method is better, QmailToaster or QmailRocks? I've had no experience with QmailRocks.
I've used qmailrocks in several different installs, and like the name says, it rocks! It is obscenely easy, to the point where somebody with no linux experience can get it going. The pages and built in scripts basically build it for you. You get a fully functional pop3/smtp/imap server that requires authentication to send, with separate webpages that allow you to control individual users within a domain, or make domain wide changes. Also, you get anti-virus and anti-spam built in, with the whole thing auto-updating.
The only additional things you need to do are to check the qmailrocks forums, specifically to see how to enable rbl checking for better anti-spam, and also if there is some error in your install. I caught an error in the debian install, where the script called for one directory, but the file it was looking for was in another.
In all it is super easy, well documented, and works like a charm. Obviously I recommend it very highly.
i have a mail server with qmailrocks-way also, but i failed to upgrade the spamassassin into version 3.1X.
it will be glad if u can share on how you did that?
No problem:
For spamassassin, I actually just update it via cspan:
perl -MCPAN -e shell
install Mail::SpamAssassin
Then restart spamassassin.
As for Clamav, up to 0.90:
stop qmail with 'qmailctl stop'
then I just downloaded the latest version and compiled it as per the qmr instructions.
As of 0.9.0, it seems a few things have changed. Here is what I had to do:
Follow qmr instructions.
in /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl, find the qmail-scanner options line that contains "--mbox" and remove that line.
Then restart qmail with 'qmailctl start'
I've seen a lot of posts about people having problems with the 0.9 releases of clamav on qmr,
so I would strongly recommend that you test it on a backup system first. If it fails,
roll back to an older version, just make clean in the clamav src directory, then roll back to an 0.8x release following the qmr instructions.
do we need to upgrade the spamassassin-tools as well?
if i remember correctly, there is a spamassassin-tools on QMR installation.
thanks.
If I'm not mistaken, you may be thinking of the perl modules required.
They should be automatically updated if your CPAN settings are configured to follow requirements when building packages.
If not, you can go through the list of requirements on qmr. If they are up to date, you will be informed, otherwise they should build.
Also, the spamassassin gave me a list of optional packages that were not installed. I added most of those also as they offer additional functionality that may be of use.
Me !
Actually i have both qmr and qmt.. nowadays i prefer qmt (qmailtoaster). it is so easy to intall, can install itself by scritps. plus it has more feature than qmr (for example chkuser). this helps to fight with spams. easy to upgrade because of rpm based install.
last words: both of them are so beautiful but i prefer qmt.
Me !
Actually i have both qmr and qmt.. nowadays i prefer qmt (qmailtoaster). it is so easy to intall, can install itself by scritps. plus it has more feature than qmr (for example chkuser). this helps to fight with spams. easy to upgrade because of rpm based install.
last words: both of them are so beautiful but i prefer qmt.
Thanks Maxut!
Now the server is running fedora 7 with QmailRocks. But the next time I try Qmailtoaster.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.