Linux - ServerThis forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi
TESTDB1 has DB storage and backup storage.
I add backup disk to backup filesystem.
I don't know why, but server want to e2fsck.
OS version is Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.4 (Santiago).
After resizing filesystem, CPU wait I/O is 30% increasing and sda5(swap) busy % keep 100% utilization during 12 hours
(Before those utilization are lower than 10%)
After was instance restart,strangely... I/O and swap busy(%) are 0%
Is the new disk you added to Volume Group, SIMPANA_VG, the same kind as the existing ones? e.g. If the existing ones are SAN disks is the new one from the same SAN disk array and presented via the same SAN switches? Dissimilar disks could cause issues as the entire VG may only run at the speed of its slowest disk.
What is your entry for simpana_bk in /etc/fstab? Is this an ext2, ext3 or ext4 disk there? ext2 is not journaled so shouldn't really be used. ext3 had odd performance issues in some situations (such as deleting all files or running fsck). Ideally you'd want to run ext4 as it performs very well on RHEL6/RHEL7.
Are any (or all of the disks) in the VG under multipath control (e.g. native Linux multipathd, EMC PowerPath)?
After was instance restart,strangely... I/O and swap busy(%) are 0%
So ... what is your problem?
Quote:
e2fsck has bug or not???
I am sure it has many bugs, but since it didn't change anything on your filesystem, I have strong doubts that the temporary increase in CPU wait time was related.
Let me speculate: Since the volume size has increased, filesystem or LVM code (is this a RAID volume?) saw an opportunity to rebalance some data, which caused a temporary increase in disk access.
Of course, this is just guessing. Since your system looks good now, it's impossible to investigate what happened before the reboot.
Next time you post something, please put commands and their input and output between code tags for better readability.
Last edited by berndbausch; 01-11-2019 at 09:37 PM.
Reason: added much needed lecture about code tags
Sounds like it might have been the ext4 lazy init proceeding in the background when the expanded filesystem was first mounted. I'm not certain this happens for a resize (as opposed to creating a new filesystem), but it sounds likely. Examining the filesystem flags while the unusual activity was happening would be the only way to be sure.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.