LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security
User Name
Password
Linux - Security This forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-13-2015, 04:00 AM   #1
General
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Distribution: Debian 7
Posts: 526

Rep: Reputation: 31
Is it more secure to leave a system disconnected or upgraded?


I have a computer with Debian installed setup very minimally to run a few tools and manage a database. The only time it needs to connect to the internet is for security updates.

Is it more secure to leave a computer disconnected, but never updated? Or are there sometimes security updates are useful even to a system that is not connected to the internet?
 
Old 03-13-2015, 06:18 AM   #2
TenTenths
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2011
Location: Dublin
Distribution: Centos 5 / 6 / 7
Posts: 3,475

Rep: Reputation: 1553Reputation: 1553Reputation: 1553Reputation: 1553Reputation: 1553Reputation: 1553Reputation: 1553Reputation: 1553Reputation: 1553Reputation: 1553Reputation: 1553
Any system that anyone accesses in any way may benefit from security updates as not all vulnerabilities "come from the internet". There are many security vulnerabilities that have "local" attack vectors.

You have to take a look at what the updates are and then decide if there are any mitigating factors. For an incredibly simplistic example, a security update for a specific apache vulnerability may be mitigated by the fact that you aren't running apache on that server.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-13-2015, 10:07 AM   #3
veerain
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Earth bound to Helios
Distribution: Custom
Posts: 2,524

Rep: Reputation: 319Reputation: 319Reputation: 319Reputation: 319
Some bugs which may corrupt valuable data may be thought as a security issue. And updating helps to fix such bugs. Again checking a update if it's actually needed is a basic protocol.
 
Old 03-13-2015, 11:16 AM   #4
Habitual
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Abingdon, VA
Distribution: Catalina
Posts: 9,374
Blog Entries: 37

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
to answer the Question

Disconnected.
 
Old 03-13-2015, 12:01 PM   #5
metaschima
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,982

Rep: Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492
Updated. There are plenty of local privilege escalation exploits that get fixed. As these can be exploited locally, staying updated is the best way to keep the system secure.

You are also assuming that a disconnected system is more secure than a connected system. Recent malware suggests otherwise. Although the malware is rare and highly targeted, it is a proof of concept that air-gapped machines are not safe from malware.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-13-2015, 11:19 PM   #6
unSpawn
Moderator
 
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 29,415
Blog Entries: 55

Rep: Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600
Indeed updated for the reasons stated above. Even if you run the machine attached to a LAN that may still be considered a hostile environment (unless the only user is you and you trust yourself, heh). To filter out security updates (here: example CVE-2015-0239) it's always good to check your distros take on things (or Mitre.org or the NVD), the latter also provides CVSS metrics to help you determine if you must upgrade immediately (or not). *Also note these days systems aren't really static anymore: requirements, location and even the state of networks change more easily, so leaving out updates may bite you when you try to modify, move or migrate it.
 
Old 03-14-2015, 04:07 AM   #7
pan64
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Hungary
Distribution: debian/ubuntu/suse ...
Posts: 21,849

Rep: Reputation: 7309Reputation: 7309Reputation: 7309Reputation: 7309Reputation: 7309Reputation: 7309Reputation: 7309Reputation: 7309Reputation: 7309Reputation: 7309Reputation: 7309
Ok, there is one, single exception: if you never want/will connect it to any network, never plug in usb (or other) devices, never mounts any kind of removable media (like cd, dvd), never installs anything, just use as a standalone machine - or never switches it on.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Webmin, secure enough or leave it off? abefroman Linux - Security 6 12-20-2009 02:39 AM
leave management system in linux karthi26 Linux - Enterprise 1 03-04-2008 02:08 PM
LXer: University of Michigan Selects SSH Tectia for Secure System Administration and Secure File Transfers LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-25-2006 12:54 AM
Need a custom tagfile set that won;t leave a broken system kittani Slackware 4 06-18-2004 12:00 PM
How to boot up from hdc1? Don't write lilo to mbr. Just leave minimum system files. bxxxr Linux - General 2 08-28-2003 05:22 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:37 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration