LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security
User Name
Password
Linux - Security This forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-16-2021, 02:46 AM   #1
dogmaiamgod
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2021
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
how concerning should this be ?new strange boot and shut down messages showed up suddenly


recently my system (Fedora workstation 34) during boot , boot messages changed, also what appears to be the same code executes at shutdown as well. what specifically is the system doing here? how do I determine what the hex code is executing? or is this normal and I an idiot. output for dmesg:

Mon Nov 15 17:17:46 2021] proc: Bad value for 'hidepid'
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:46 2021] [drm] enabling PCIE gen 3 link speeds, disable with radeon.pcie_gen2=0
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:47 2021] [drm] PCIE GART of 2048M enabled (table at 0x00000000001D6000).
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:47 2021] radeon 0000:01:00.0: WB enabled
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:47 2021] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 0 use gpu addr 0x0000000040000c00 and cpu addr 0x00000000e758f45e
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:47 2021] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 1 use gpu addr 0x0000000040000c04 and cpu addr 0x00000000ce8bc762
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:47 2021] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 2 use gpu addr 0x0000000040000c08 and cpu addr 0x000000008ec3fc35
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:47 2021] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 3 use gpu addr 0x0000000040000c0c and cpu addr 0x00000000a974746e
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:47 2021] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 4 use gpu addr 0x0000000040000c10 and cpu addr 0x000000005d9a4105
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:47 2021] radeon 0000:01:00.0: fence driver on ring 5 use gpu addr 0x0000000000075a18 and cpu addr 0x000000004b47c483
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:47 2021] radeon 0000:01:00.0: failed VCE resume (-110).
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:48 2021] [drm] ring test on 0 succeeded in 1 usecs
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:48 2021] [drm] ring test on 1 succeeded in 1 usecs
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:48 2021] [drm] ring test on 2 succeeded in 1 usecs
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:48 2021] [drm] ring test on 3 succeeded in 3 usecs
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:48 2021] [drm] ring test on 4 succeeded in 3 usecs
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:48 2021] [drm] ring test on 5 succeeded in 2 usecs
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:48 2021] [drm] UVD initialized successfully.
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:48 2021] [drm] ib test on ring 0 succeeded in 0 usecs
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:48 2021] [drm] ib test on ring 1 succeeded in 0 usecs
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:48 2021] [drm] ib test on ring 2 succeeded in 0 usecs
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:48 2021] [drm] ib test on ring 3 succeeded in 0 usecs
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:48 2021] [drm] ib test on ring 4 succeeded in 0 usecs
[Mon Nov 15 17:17:48 2021] [drm] ib test on ring 5 succeeded
[Mon Nov 15 17:18:45 2021] proc: Bad value for 'hidepid'
[Mon Nov 15 17:21:02 2021] proc: Bad value for 'hidepid'
[Mon Nov 15 17:21:25 2021] proc: Bad value for 'hidepid'
[Mon Nov 15 17:25:52 2021] EXT4-fs (sda2): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
[Mon Nov 15 17:25:52 2021] packagekitd[1485]: segfault at ffffffffffffff88 ip 00007f65fc0cbbd4 sp 00007ffc0493dba0 error 7 in libdnf.so.2[7f65fc08a000+ed000]
[Mon Nov 15 17:25:52 2021] Code: 8d 3d 50 b4 0a 00 53 89 d3 48 8d 15 43 d0 0a 00 48 83 ec 08 4c 63 2d 43 ef 0f 00 e8 16 8c fc ff f6 c3 01 75 21 83 e3 02 74 0c <42> c7 84 2d b8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 48 83 c4 08 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d
[Mon Nov 15 17:25:52 2021] proc: Bad value for 'hidepid'
[Mon Nov 15 17:34:23 2021] proc: Bad value for 'hidepid'
[Mon Nov 15 17:43:59 2021] SELinux: Converting 716 SID table entries...
[Mon Nov 15 17:43:59 2021] SELinux: policy capability network_peer_controls=1
[Mon Nov 15 17:43:59 2021] SELinux: policy capability open_perms=1
[Mon Nov 15 17:43:59 2021] SELinux: policy capability extended_socket_class=1
[Mon Nov 15 17:43:59 2021] SELinux: policy capability always_check_network=0
[Mon Nov 15 17:43:59 2021] SELinux: policy capability cgroup_seclabel=1
[Mon Nov 15 17:43:59 2021] SELinux: policy capability nnp_nosuid_transition=1
[Mon Nov 15 17:47:49 2021] systemd-sysv-generator[20943]: SysV service '/etc/rc.d/init.d/livesys-late' lacks a native systemd unit file. Automatically generating a unit file for compatibility. Please update package to include a native sy>
[Mon Nov 15 17:47:49 2021] systemd-sysv-generator[20943]: SysV service '/etc/rc.d/init.d/livesys' lacks a native systemd unit file. Automatically generating a unit file for compatibility. Please update package to include a native systemd>
[Mon Nov 15 17:47:50 2021] systemd-sysv-generator[21926]: SysV service '/etc/rc.d/init.d/livesys-late' lacks a native systemd unit file. Automatically generating a unit file for compatibility. Please update package to include a native sy>
[Mon Nov 15 17:47:50 2021] systemd-sysv-generator[21926]: SysV service '/etc/rc.d/init.d/livesys' lacks a native systemd unit file. Automatically generating a unit file for compatibility. Please update package to include a native systemd>
 
Old 11-22-2021, 01:16 PM   #2
smallpond
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 4,143

Rep: Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264
PackageKit provides a common interface to various update software, in your case dnf. The error suggests there is a bug in either packagekitd or libdnf.so. I suppose the code is what it was executing at the time, but it doesn't seem to be particularly helpful, does it? error 7 usually means "Argument list too long", which might be some kind of clue. Current on my Fedora 34 system is:
Code:
rpm -qa PackageKit
PackageKit-1.2.4-2.fc34.x86_64
 
Old 11-23-2021, 02:52 AM   #3
ondoho
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 19,872
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053Reputation: 6053
"radeon" has something to do with AMD graphics. "drm" too, indirectly.
"systemd-sysv-generator" clearly tells you what the matter is - it's more of a notice/warning anyhow.

Not so familiar with SELinux.

Nothing here looks worrisome to me.
 
Old 11-23-2021, 02:49 PM   #4
smallpond
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 4,143

Rep: Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264Reputation: 1264
The warnings about livesys are unrelated to PackageKit. Those are leftovers caused by installing from live media.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
shut down problem - wont shut down.. UbrInKid Linux - Newbie 4 12-10-2009 06:20 AM
Xubuntu won't shut down - black screen after trying to shut down Snickar-Lasse Ubuntu 2 11-30-2009 04:33 PM
Strange message showed up in gnome-terminal fakie_flip Linux - Security 1 05-21-2007 05:32 AM
strange messages on shut down or reboot dr0n3 Fedora 0 09-26-2005 12:32 AM
shut down won't shut system down taoweijia Linux - General 3 03-03-2004 06:05 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration