Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have seen different versions of Gnome and KDE, but i am unsure as to which one is better to use. I know its all about preference, but which is more customizable, has alot of features, and will grow with the times? If there is anything better then the 2 mentioned, i am open to all suggestions. I just want a very customizable and good looking GUI.
Location: Rome, Italy ; Novi Sad, Srbija; Brisbane, Australia
Distribution: Ubuntu / ITOS2008
Posts: 1,207
Rep:
Enlightenment is very customizable, however the current stable release 0.16.5 i think is buggy and slow compared to fluxbox, but very cool nonetheless, and still faster than KDE/GNOME, but if you have the bandwith and tiome download the development CVS version that is really awesome, and when it is released as stable, im convinced it will enjoy a lot of popularity.
If you dont want to mess with development stuff, then fluxbox. It's small, lightweight, very fast, and customizable to a certain point. You can change themes and hack some things here and there in the ~/.fluxbox/init, but you can't change window frames, save sessions. have different wallpapers for each desktop, have virtual screens AND virtual desktops together, etc.. like in Enlightenment.
More info about Enlightenmnt 0.17 (AKA development version) can be found on their site www.enlightenmnt.org
HTH
-NSKL
I recently switched to OpenBox and I loved it (it's another branch of the original Blackbox project). Personally I thought Enlightenment was a bit of a pain to use, but it looks like .17 is supposed to change that.
I used fluxbox, GNOME, and KDE. I'm running Slack 8.1 and KDE 3 is awesome. It runs all of my favorites programs without a problem. Besides, if you have an Athlon XP or Pentium 4 machine paired up with a Radeon or GeForce video card, who cares how big and chunky the desktop environment is. Performance issues are a thing of the past with Linux and today's hardware.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.