Thunderbird does not respect spaces -> do you know an easy solution?
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
45.8.0 - and "52.9.1-1~deb" is available. But the bug I originally pointed is still open... we must be doing something different (should it be the rich text you have?).
Hmmm. All I can say, again, is that I cannot duplicate the behavior of which you complain in version 5.9.1.
Hmmm. All I can say, again, is that I cannot duplicate the behavior of which you complain in version 5.9.1.
But the TB bug is still open. And you have HTML format checked in your test. This is the only big difference I noted in our tests.
I thank you very much for the repeated tests you did, and your attention here.
I just repeated the test steps I wrote in my #15 post (I did it and edited a few details there) - problem repeated, test text improved. Now I will change *only* the HTML default composing and see if the problem repeats or not...
Yes! And there are duplicates and other things. Further, I have seen people that got away from Mozilla dev'ing due their way to never fix some kind of things (I do not know clear examples to give).
Quote:
Originally Posted by scasey
And I don't see a way to turn off HTML formatting for composing a message...only to send it as plain text only, or HTML, or both.
I said it in the test steps. :d And that it not an option you have when composing messages. It is here:
- goto to one account's setting (which is *not* edit > prefs)
- goto "edit and address" (or something similar)
- there is a checkbox "use HTML formatting", which I have unchecked
OK! in 52.9.1
Account Settings
Composition and Addressing
Check or uncheck Compose message in HTML format.
Unchecked, repeated the create a template test. Spaces are NOT preserved!! Your case duplicated. (!)
Also noted that if the template is created with "compose in HTML" turned on, then turn it off, the spaces are still preserved, but the resulting email is back to being composed in HTML...so the compose setting is apparently saved with the template.
Maybe compose in HTML and also select the plain text delivery option before you save the template. I'm presuming that the delivery option will be saved with the template. Spaces will be preserved, but the message should be delivered as plain text (I haven't tested any of that, tho)
Please repeat my steps and confirm the problem repeats with you
Quote:
Originally Posted by dedec0
Maybe this is the key to reproduce the problem. I unchecked "[account] > settings > 'edit and address' > 'use formatting' ".
Test steps:
1. Save the following code to /dev/shm/slide.eml file, which is UTF-8 encoded. Type of line breaks should not matter (agree?). Note the file ends with two empty lines (so the file ends with two line breaks).
Code:
From: mi <a@s.ru>
Subject: Testando arrastar 1
To: mi <a@s.ru>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2019 19:54:36 -0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
2018.09.11 ~12.30
usuário:
habilidade:
país:
-*-*-*- Comentários meus -*-*-*-
-*-*-*-
Conversa pós jogo:
2018.09.
11 ~12.30
-*-*-*-
# EOF before "#" in this line. These lines are here simply
# because LQ eats the second newline when showing post to
# us -> LQ bug?
2. Have a Thunderbird window showing the message list of a draft folder for one IMAP account you have. Open a file manager window in the folder /dev/shm (or the folder where you saved the EML file in step 1).
3. Drag the EML file from the file manager to the message list part of the Thunderbird window. This should make the message be sent and shown as another draft in your IMAP folder (yes, saved remotely!).
4. *Single* click the new draft message to show it below the list (or open it for reading in another window, if you prefer) and select its text. The extra spaces on lines 2, 3, 4 should be seen.
5. Now, in the message list again, right click the message and choose "edit as new". This will open the message for editing... but the spaces ending lines 2, 3, 4 are not as they were! The lines 2, 3 and 4 are mixed together in a single line - but are kept separate from line one!
The result after step five is this text in the compose window:
It makes no sense. Wrap a line if it ends with spaces, but keep it otherwise... this is *not* what Thunderbird do with poetry (and similar) text!
Now, I will do these steps with HTML setting checked for that account. The result will be in another post.
The test steps I list above uses a text only message. Even after I change setting to "use HTML formatting", the problem repeats. The only "sub-situation" the spaces are preserved is when I reply the draft message (containing the spaces) in HTML mode. And there are 2 ways of doing that: 1) check "use HTML formatting" for the account; 2) hold the shift key to get the opposite choice of the account setting we go in step 1.
If others who use Thunderbird confirm the steps given in #21 are sufficient to repeat the problem, then (I think) it can be used as a good bug report. Please do that.
But the problem is not solved. At least for now, I will change the way I use some of my drafts: instead of *editing* it, I will *copy its contents* to keep the spaces as is. Not a good solution, but that is all I see now.
No. Not necessarily. What I thought is that I want to make this thread having all needed information, so a bug report can be easily made from it (myself or whoever wants to).
#20? I did read it, and repeated that now. I cannot understand it. And you say "check or uncheck HTML"... or? How to follow steps from that? Doing it two times? And from this "or" part to the rest of #20, I have a hard time understanding and following your thoughts. And it did not seem a solution to me, so I concluded (wrong, seems now) it was not a solution.
^ well i hope scasey will help you clarify this, but if that fails:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dedec0
I want to make this thread having all needed information, so a bug report can be easily made from it (myself or whoever wants to).
yes, it should be you.
i think it's ridiculous to ask for help with a problem that apparently only you perceive as a big problem, then go on dissecting it in a fairly technical manner, call it a bug (again, only you, at least for 8 years), and then say "now all the info is there, someone else can file a bug"...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.