Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Main place I look when I have a question about some software where the information about it seems to be sparse.
Ask the author(s)
Download the source and read it
Seems as if the information you are looking for is rare knowledge.
Please update the forum if you happen to reach a conclusion after reviewing the code. Note that the download link from that webpage contains different architecture based versions of aptitude, arm hard float is included in that list.
I believe just leaving off the "=" sign may work..nothing more 'complex' than a syntax error, but the OP can't seem to grasp that.
Add to that the fact that (if the OP actually added in the repos for ARM), they don't HAVE to specify architecture, just "apt-get install bluez". That was suggested in some of the other (several) threads they have open about this.
I wholeheartedly agree that the OP has been given full answers as to what exactly they should try.
Meanwhile they seem to be repeatedly asking for more expert level knowledge about how aptitude works.
My best recommendation is therefore to follow the recommendations I've outlined, however really my "go to" variation on that would be to read the source code. I feel one cannot countermand what actual source code says, and in fact you can build it yourself and test it out, or add debug/features to it to customize it.
They claim very much to know how to read and seem to imply greatly that LQ members are unable to provide sufficient answers. Therefore the links provide contain a great deal of information for them to read, which will clearly answer any and all questions they have about the aptitude package.
Distribution: Currently: OpenMandriva. Previously: openSUSE, PCLinuxOS, CentOS, among others over the years.
Posts: 3,881
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TB0ne
Obviously not, since not only the error message but many others have told you very plainly that you are not specifying things correctly. It is telling you it fails because you're not putting the command in correctly. Many examples covered in many how-to guides: https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/HOWTO
Did you try "-a armhf", without the "="???
Which was exactly what they have already been told.
Quote:
Your post is far from complex, but the answers you've received (here and in the numerous other bluez threads you've started) seem to be too complex. I put "linux apt specify architecture", and found the link posted above. Very first hit, for 681,000 others.
Aman to that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TB0ne
...nothing more 'complex' than a syntax error, but the OP can't seem to grasp that.
Add to that the fact that (if the OP actually added in the repos for ARM), they don't HAVE to specify architecture, just "apt-get install bluez". That was suggested in some of the other (several) threads they have open about this.
Once again, exactly what they've been told.
In any case, this OP is the latest addition to my Ignore List.
root@host:~# apt -a=amd64 install zsh
E: Command line option 'a' [from -a=amd64] is not understood in combination with the other options.
root@host:~# apt -a amd64 install zsh
E: Command line option 'a' [from -a] is not understood in combination with the other options.
root@host:~#
root@host:~# apt -a=amd64 install zsh
E: Command line option 'a' [from -a=amd64] is not understood in combination with the other options.
root@host:~# apt -a amd64 install zsh
E: Command line option 'a' [from -a] is not understood in combination with the other options.
root@host:~#
I tested it on amd64. but here it is on RPi3, raspbian stretch:
Code:
root@host:~# apt -a=armhf install zsh
E: Command line option 'a' [from -a=armhf] is not understood in combination with the other options.
root@host:~# apt -a armhf install zsh
E: Command line option 'a' [from -a] is not understood in combination with the other options.
root@host:~# apt -a=world install zsh
E: Command line option 'a' [from -a=world] is not understood in combination with the other options.
root@host:~# apt -asomething install zsh
E: Command line option 'a' [from -asomething] is not understood in combination with the other options.
root@host:~# apt -a surprise install zsh
E: Command line option 'a' [from -a] is not understood in combination with the other options.
root@host:~#
The "apt-get" option -a description / doc is indirectly saying -a is to be used in compile and not in install.
Of course the bluez I am trying to work with is complied.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.