Newbie with an old computer - runs Window 95 - is it worth converting to Linux OS
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Newbie with an old computer - runs Window 95 - is it worth converting to Linux OS
This is my first post, I just registered this morning.
I run an Architectural Office from my home office using AutoCAD on Windows systems. A client suggested some time ago that I should use a Linux OS. At this point I don't know if that is even an option for the business or even if my other software vendors support Linux, but that is not the point of this posting.
I have been reading about Linux OS for some time, but still do not know much about it. I am interest in investigating Linux to see if it can be useful to me personally or professionally.
So this gets me to the reason of this posting.
I have an old Dell XPS, PII 266, with a 4 gig scsi drive and scsi cd-rom, and it has 1 gig of ram. I stopped using it in the business years ago. I even gave it to my parents to use, and it has since come back to me. Right now my young daughter uses it to play around. This was my first computer purchase out of college, at the time it was for personal use, but was powerful enough to be used in my business when I ventured out on my own. The OS on it is Windows 95. Ancient, I know.
So, I have this old computer, and an interest in learning about Linux OS. I saw an article posted on Linux.org about new life for an old computer. Does anyone out there think this computer can be useful for investigating Linux? Or is it too much of a dinosaur? If there is still some life left for this old warrior, can anyone suggest a possible distro I might install? I downloaded the latest version of Ubuntu yesterday, but given the age of the computer, I doubt this would even run on it.
Does anyone have any suggestions? Or should this old Dell be retired to the recycling bin?
Last edited by digitalpreimage; 06-01-2008 at 10:36 AM.
It will be good for just about any version of linux out there.
I like Fedora myself.
I think that you will find even GUI versions of Linux will run super fast on that PC and that you will have none of the problems that you had with Windows 95/98
Yeah, most PCs from that age have too little ram to work properly with current distors using KDE or Gnome.
But that setup is perfect for experimenting; you have enough ram to run just about everything, but slow enough CPU to actually notice some differences resulting from the choices you make.
for GUI Red Hat will run on anything greater that 128mb.
I would try gnome but it that runs too slow then maybe do a reinstall and choose the xwindows (it is a ultra lite GUI for old PCs)
Definitely! I think it would make a great Linux learning/experimenting machine!
As to what you might install on it exactly, I will not try making suggestions, but instead point you to distrowatch.com where you can research MANY MANY Linuxes in an organized fashion, and use their search engine to narrow down the choices by various criteria.
If you decide to get rid of the computer instead-- I'll take it!
Probably the biggest pitfall to look out for is going to be the GUI environment you use. The full featured Linux environment, KDE and Gnome, may have trouble with that little RAM. However, XFCE, Fluxbox or a few others will likely work just fine with that amount of RAM. If you're in for a REAL adventure, that would be very excellent hardware for a console only machine.
A 4GB drive is going to hold most distros, provided you are reasonable with the software you install on it. Most distros come with a lot of server software that you simply aren't going to need. A good, fully functional web browsing, emailing, general office work machine should easily come in at under 2 GB.
You might want to give one of the Ubuntu offshoots a try. Xbuntu uses XFCE and Fluxbuntu uses Fluxbox. If you don't mind putting in some sweat, Slackware would run very nicely on that machine. It just has a steeper learning curve that the *buntus.
OP has 1 GB of RAM, this is certainly more than enough. I'm not sure if SCSI is probed by default, you may need to use doscsi boot option when booting to install.
I have an old Dell XPS, PII 266, with a 4 gig scsi drive and scsi cd-rom, and it has 1 gig of ram.
Most machines of this age have 128 or 256 of ram, which makes things a little tricky, but with 1 G of ram, you have a pretty good choice.
Of course, a 4 G hard disk is a bit limiting for some of the 'do anything' distros - you can deal with this by being selective about what you install (assuming that the install routine is sufficiently flexible to give you the choice and doesn't just install everything).
The other, and, I, would argue, better option would be to choose a 'small' distro. Something like DSL, Puppy, Frugalware would be an ideal thing to try (look at distrowatch for a disturbingly large list of distros).
Equally, as a first try, a live CD would be ideal. I assume that your CD drive is really just a CD and not a CD/DVD drive, which would have been more flexible (so you'll have to avoid live DVDs and install DVDs, unless you have an external device or a swappable device that you can use).
I'm not sure whether the point of this post goes on to CAD programs, but I'm pretty sure that Autocad doesn't have a native Linux version, so if that is the eventual point, you might need to investigate whether Autocad runs under Wine. Or, something else like QCad. Or, maybe ask your Linux-using client what he uses.
<...OP has 1 GB of RAM, this is certainly more than enough...>
Indeed, I don't see the RAM being of concern. 1GB is pretty good for a Linux, no matter which way one looks at it.
I ran KDE with no noticeable problem, with 512MB for a year or so, 'till I bought a bunch of RAM a little while ago.
With the OPs CPU speed, it will no doubt be slowish, but shouldn't have any OOM issues (Out Of Memory).
Last edited by GrapefruiTgirl; 06-01-2008 at 01:32 PM.
"So, I see you have many degrees, diplomas, and certificates.. That's good, very good! However, let us keep things in perspective: not a single one of them reads 'expert' anywhere."
lol I just looked;you are right. Now where is my sharpie????
Last edited by watcher69b; 06-01-2008 at 01:54 PM.
There is lot of linux distro that support your computer spect. Just for example, there are puppy linux, damn small linux, feather linux, etc. If you want more to know that distro, visit www.distrowatch.com. There are some kind of wizard that will guide you which distro that is suitable with you.
You might go back to Linux.org and check out their distributions page. You can search by category and 'minimalist' might be the ones to check for a hardrive that small. As others have said, 1GB of RAM is plenty but a 4GB hardrive won't do much with some of the bigger distros.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.