Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!


  Search this Thread
Old 06-27-2004, 05:36 PM   #16
Registered: Apr 2004
Posts: 87

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15

You are right about debian. I came to it with installing knoppix, which was pretty easy.

Started out with suse 8.2. After trying to get some things working (ethernet card and video) I, as newbie, got stuck in the command line.

So I tried out, hold on, lycoris 3. Got stuck in a 16 bit desktop. Not nice.

Decided to try the new debian installer: didn't install.

Tried knoppix 3.3: finaly could connect to the internet (vpn setup not that easy, days reading manuals). Not being able to have 3d I took with it, no problem. After first apt-get everything went nuts. Over and over because I liked it I tried to get it right.

Today I downloaded suse 9.1: won't install.

I'm not giving up. But so far I even haven't had the chance to be productive with linux. I have had more time, and used it too, to read docs than most people. So I can understand when someone cries 'make linux easier for the general population'. I don't think I ask too much when I would like some up to date packages (I can wait a month or so) without having to spend days fixing my system.

But I saw someone mentioning gentoo. I'm looking into it right now.
Old 06-27-2004, 05:59 PM   #17
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: hopefully not here
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 2,038

Rep: Reputation: 51
yes, Gentoo's portage makes installs easy (and a bit limiting, you really have no choice about how things are installed, but it does apply a lot of patches to all sorts of software, and is easy, so once you get used to it (like the apt-get and rpm system i think) you will probably love it)

plus theres some good documentation on there web site for just about anything to get people started

(the only drawback (besides the fact you don't get much choice unless you edit the .ebuild files, as to what things are configured with, and what patch's are made,, are unless you skip the "emerge" program completely and use "ebuild" program directly) is that theres not that many ebuilds in the emerge system (growing daily, but you might find some things you want are not there.. theres still enough in there to keep most people well happy tho)

Last edited by SciYro; 06-27-2004 at 06:00 PM.
Old 06-27-2004, 06:27 PM   #18
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: in a fallen world
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 23,067
Blog Entries: 11

Rep: Reputation: 911Reputation: 911Reputation: 911Reputation: 911Reputation: 911Reputation: 911Reputation: 911Reputation: 911
Personally I'd always go with Slackware ;}
Old 06-27-2004, 06:46 PM   #19
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Somerset, England
Distribution: Slackware 10.2, Slackware 10.0, Ubuntu 9.10
Posts: 1,938

Rep: Reputation: 55
Originally posted by Tinkster
Personally I'd always go with Slackware ;}
I second that

Installation was flawless; many common libraries are included and up to date; you really learn linux when you don't have GUI tools to do every job for you - it gives a great sense of achievement.

Plus installation from source means more things are more likely to work and installing one thing doesn't *&#! up another part!
Old 06-28-2004, 05:20 PM   #20
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: hopefully not here
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 2,038

Rep: Reputation: 51
Komakino: Gentoo can install source or binary, portage solves all (and usually all, i mean even the ones that aren't required are included....but you can modify the ebuilds if all else fails)

Gentoo can also do no X (but need to modify some ebuilds as they want X, but don't require it) from what i can tell, Gentoo and Slackware are pretty similar (but installs are easier in Gentoo if you have the ebuilds, just enter 1 command and sit back and wait)
Old 06-28-2004, 05:41 PM   #21
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Distribution: Debian 9 Stretch
Posts: 2,349
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 383Reputation: 383Reputation: 383Reputation: 383
Actually, Windows dependencies are a lot worse than Linux dependencies--or I should say they WERE at lot worse. Look up the term "dll hell", which refers to Windows .dll files (basically shared libraries). Dll hell was a problem because different applications would only work with certain versions of dlls, and thus making applications incompatible in annoying ways.

The solution? More or less, the solution has been for Windows apps to stop using dlls except where absolutely necessary. This means extra software bloat, but hey--at least the software actually works. But if you do things with ODBC or any sort of legacy business apps, you have to deal with dll hell even today.

My first experiences with "dll hell" were way before Windows 95. Back in the '80s the Amiga OS had many advanced features including shared software libraries. They were basically dlls, a decade earlier. They were great for conserving RAM, but absolute hell when different programs needed different versions of the same shared library.


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Solution Dual Boot Windows & Linux [ALL DONE IN WINDOWS] No Linux terminology DSargeant Linux - Newbie 4 11-10-2005 12:37 PM
Httrack for linux with dependencies aureex Linux - Software 0 07-29-2004 02:29 PM
Error: failed dependencies installing php-4.3.5 on redhat linux 9 lynsue Linux - Software 3 04-30-2004 05:50 AM
problem while running linux 9,it always stops at checking modular dependencies sooraj_menon Linux - Hardware 1 03-02-2004 07:06 AM
I recieve a failed dependencies error, but I have all required dependencies Laptop2250 Linux - Software 15 02-03-2004 08:58 PM > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration