Is there a distribution that has qla2xxx fc drivers already compiled?
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Is there a distribution that has qla2xxx fc drivers already compiled?
Looking for a distribution that has qla2xxx already compiled into the kernel. I've read over procedures for creating a custom kernel with the driver installed and I don't think that I am ready to tackle that just yet. Maybe I'm wrong here, but most how to's appear to assume a level of competency that I have yet to achieve. Of course, you may argue that I'll not get there unless I try, but I gotta get this project rolling. I can't be in the lab forever while I learn.
Well, Tinkster, that's the thing, I don't know what distro to use. I'm most familiar with Ubuntu (Gnome gui), and maybe, that's where I should stay. Then again, I don't know the pros/cons of any distro. I do know that currently I want a comprehensive os able to work right out of the box, but I can also see that being able to tailor the code to my needs, some time in the future, is a very good possibility. This fiber channel stuff is a good example. Never used fiber before, have untested hardware (that's always a treat:Ebay, (I'm on a budget!)). Using forums have uncovered minimal amount of useful data, though I admit, some. What I have read has caused more confusion than clarity. That's seems to be true for most any topic, not just computer os's. So, being frustrated, I think to myself, "how about using a distro that is known to work well?", this would help me narrow down the unknowns. Thus, my post.
Couldn't you have saved yourself the initial post by
simply searching your /lib/modules directory for
qla2xxx? Or /lib64/modules if you're running x86_64?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.