Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Good morning, when i first install Red Hat Linux 6.2, i in the installation wizard there i choice the "Server" not a workstation, after finish i install, when start boot to this OS, there just only "command line interface" whatever i press CTRL+ALT+F6 also cannot go to GUI. than i see the process status command PS -A, there dont have X running. How to install GUI(Gnome,KDE)?i already try to install. Example: rpm X******.rpm to install but cannot?? what step to install Gnome and KDE,and how to configure when start Linux than i can choice for GUI or command interface. Please help me thank you.
You don't. It should be illegal to install a Linux distro that old, because it just makes things more difficult for everyone in the long run. Even a couple years is a long time in the Linux world, so seven is like eons. (Red Hat 6.2 was released on April 3, 2000)
You don't. It should be illegal to install a Linux distro that old, because it just makes things more difficult for everyone in the long run. Even a couple years is a long time in the Linux world, so seven is like eons. (Red Hat 6.2 was released on April 3, 2000)
Soooo....I guess I'm in a bit of trouble with my Apple-II and my copy of Windows 3.1.....
sure you can use RH 6.2--you just may need to work a bit harder...
I have a pentium 2 system with RH 7.2 installed. It used to have 6.2 on it until someone from the linux users group gave me a copy of 7.2 which I installed over the top of it. THe hardware is very old & not very fast. It is one of the first systems with the ext3 filesystem. The same pc has also got
windows 98 & beos & calera open linux.
P.s pixellany when I first started working in computers I remember fixing valve (vacuum tube) machines
card punches not ibm + E have soldered lots of things.
You don't. It should be illegal to install a Linux distro that old, because it just makes things more difficult for everyone in the long run. Even a couple years is a long time in the Linux world, so seven is like eons. (Red Hat 6.2 was released on April 3, 2000)
Without knowing how the system is used, you better recall that statement. I'm still running RH6.2 in a professional environment as I don't have the time to investigate of the dedicated hardware and software will work on newer versions. And I don't think that it makes your life difficult as you can not get to the machine.
Last edited by Wim Sturkenboom; 08-02-2007 at 01:53 PM.
Soooo....I guess I'm in a bit of trouble with my Apple-II and my copy of Windows 3.1.....
Yep, you're under arrest.
Quote:
Without knowing how the system is used, you better recall that statement.
Calm down there, it was meant playfully. In some production environments, older kernel versions may be needed for weird hardware and certain apps. This is, however, a very special case which I assume would have been mentioned earlier. Most people don't have to deal with legacy systems.
There also seems to be a rumor going around that hardware requirements are directly proportional to the age of the distro. Obviously, this isn't actually the case as there are brand spanking new lightweight distros, and older ones built like battle tanks.
For instance, really old releases haven't got up to date security fixes. Just a consideration. It's also very difficult to get help because almost nobody uses stuff that old and you can't get updated SW in a lot of cases.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.