find depedencies of e.g. wireshark-2.2.3 by command
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
For those that might be able to answer this question, which distribution and version of Linux are you running
Hi chtsalid and welcome to LQ. I have provided links below in my first paragraph below, please consider reviewing those to help you with your question. The remainder is more of a discussion relevant to advice givers.
Hi ardvark71 , it would be more effective an additive to the question if you were to offer links towards how best to ask a question, such as the Welcome to LQ link or the link on what constitutes a good question.
In the future please remember that while the good intentions are noted and partially helpful, it would be much more helpful to consider the intentions discussed in this thread regarding properly assisting new LQ members. A suggestion would be to review the thread, the cited reference in that thread, and contacting Jeremy if you wish to be part of the team which Jeremy has suggested for helping new members.
In the future please remember that while the good intentions are noted and partially helpful, it would be much more helpful to consider the intentions discussed in this thread regarding properly assisting new LQ members. A suggestion would be to review the thread, the cited reference in that thread, and contacting Jeremy if you wish to be part of the team which Jeremy has suggested for helping new members.
Hi...
Thank you for your thoughts. While I see nothing particularly wrong with my post, I understand your suggestion concerning the "Welcome to LQ" link. At the same time, The OP is not exactly a new member and while I did see the thread you mentioned before, I chose not to become a volunteer.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.