Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place! |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
11-15-2004, 07:05 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 10
Rep:
|
Can I install Linux on a machine that already has Win2K on it?
I am new to Linux. I have some familiarity with Unix on old Sun machines.
I would like to install Linux as an alternative OS on a machine which already has Win2K on it (and a large unused/unformatted disk partition).
I would have to download the Linux software using the Win2K machine.
I am not clear how to proceed... do I use the Win2K machine to download some binary images, burn them as CDs and then "boot" from one of these? Is there a tutorial to tell me exactly how?
Will the Win2K (currently on c) remain intact?
I guess the info I need is already on you site.. can you tell me where?
Regards,
Nick Toop
|
|
|
11-15-2004, 07:14 AM
|
#2
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 20
Rep:
|
Re
The method u suggested of downloading and burning will work fine. Tthe Win2K u have in ur C drive will remain intact. ok.  . Try not to install Linux in the secondary partition of Win2K, eventhough it might be free.  .
|
|
|
11-15-2004, 07:43 AM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: Slackware 10, Gentoo
Posts: 292
Rep:
|
woah. why the windows bootloader?
lilo or grub or others would do the job just fine/better.
|
|
|
11-15-2004, 07:53 AM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Vestfold, Norway
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 139
Rep:
|
I suggest using windows bootloader for persons new to Linux.
If something happens, and they don't want Linux anymore (I don't know why that would be..) they can edit the bootmanager and continue along the path they did, before installing Linux. This without having to re-install Windows completely...
Personally I use LILO, and find that to be just as good as Windows BM.
|
|
|
11-16-2004, 04:25 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: Slackware 10, Gentoo
Posts: 292
Rep:
|
I use both grub and lilo, and find them to be better/easier to configure. and, should something happen, you do not need to reinstall windows, all that is needed is a simple "fixmbr" from the recovery console on the windows cd.
|
|
|
11-16-2004, 06:09 PM
|
#7
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Eire
Distribution: SuSE9.1
Posts: 19
Rep:
|
Hi all,
Whether to use windows or linux bootloader depends, in my experience, on the distro. Use SuSE or Mandrake - no problem, lilo/grub recognises both OSs without any hassle. Use Debian (like I tried) and it might overwrite your MBR (master boot record) and there goes Win for ever (which may be a blessing...)
p_finn
|
|
|
11-16-2004, 06:23 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: New Zealand
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 1,046
Rep:
|
Quote:
Use Debian (like I tried) and it might overwrite your MBR (master boot record) and there goes Win for ever
|
...Well, you can always edit your /etc/lilo.conf or menu.lst to add in your old windows partition again. Usually it's just a matter of uncommenting out a few lines
But most distros these days, including the new Sarge installer, will autodetect a windows partition and add it to the boot menu anyway.
Cheers,
mj
|
|
|
11-17-2004, 03:35 PM
|
#9
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Eire
Distribution: SuSE9.1
Posts: 19
Rep:
|
Hi mj,
Absolutely true. But at the time of installing Debian (Sarge it was, and it did ask where it should set the bootloader and warned about installing it on mbr) I was a complete ignoramus (and overly enthusiastic, neglecting readmes) concerning Linux and I just went happily along pressing enter. (D'Oh)
So a tip for ye all Linux beginners: Always read the documentation.
Bless ya,
p_finn
|
|
|
11-18-2004, 07:04 AM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: Slackware 10, Gentoo
Posts: 292
Rep:
|
and a tip for you linux beginners.... if you install on mbr without an entry for windows just edit the config :/
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:51 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|