[SOLVED] ACPI error at the end of boot; how to delete that error?

floppy_stuttgart · 04-26-2015, 12:00 PM

Hello,
know anybody how to delete that error at the end of dmesg?
If was not here before I installed the fglrx instead of the radeon driver.

Dmesg:

Code:

...
[    1.596047] Switching to clocksource tsc
[    1.631859] EXT4-fs (sda2): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
[    3.546830] udevd[345]: starting version 175
[    4.065641] microcode: CPU0 sig=0xf43, pf=0x10, revision=0x4
[    4.176993] input: Power Button as /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0C0C:00/input/input2
[    4.177008] ACPI: Power Button [PBTN]
[    4.177320] input: Power Button as /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXPWRBN:00/input/input3
[    4.177330] ACPI: Power Button [PWRF]
[    4.613393] Linux agpgart interface v0.103
[    4.626342] microcode: CPU1 sig=0xf43, pf=0x10, revision=0x4
[    4.631009] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>, Peter Oruba
[    4.638056] intel_rng: Firmware space is locked read-only. If you can't or
[    4.638056] intel_rng: don't want to disable this in firmware setup, and if
[    4.638056] intel_rng: you are certain that your system has a functional
[    4.638056] intel_rng: RNG, try using the 'no_fwh_detect' option.
[    4.681411] pci_hotplug: PCI Hot Plug PCI Core version: 0.5
[    4.690751] input: PC Speaker as /devices/platform/pcspkr/input/input4
[    4.696106] shpchp: Standard Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.4
[    4.709723] wmi: Mapper loaded
[    5.049796] iTCO_vendor_support: vendor-support=0
[    5.061788] iTCO_wdt: Intel TCO WatchDog Timer Driver v1.10
[    5.061833] iTCO_wdt: Found a ICH6 or ICH6R TCO device (Version=2, TCOBASE=0xf860)
[    5.062003] iTCO_wdt: initialized. heartbeat=30 sec (nowayout=0)
[    5.086318] snd_intel8x0 0000:00:1e.2: setting latency timer to 64
[    5.508031] intel8x0_measure_ac97_clock: measured 54792 usecs (2640 samples)
[    5.508037] intel8x0: clocking to 48000
[    6.353849] fglrx: module license 'Proprietary. (C) 2002 - ATI Technologies, Starnberg, GERMANY' taints kernel.
[    6.353855] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
[    6.387515] <6>[fglrx] Maximum main memory to use for locked dma buffers: 2894 MBytes.
[    6.387775] <6>[fglrx]   vendor: 1002 device: 68f9 revision: 0 count: 1
[    6.388429] <6>[fglrx] ioport: bar 4, base 0x1000, size: 0x100
[    6.388842] <6>[fglrx] Kernel PAT support is enabled
[    6.388877] <6>[fglrx] module loaded - fglrx 14.50.2 [Nov 20 2014] with 1 minors
[    7.410180] EXT4-fs (sda2): re-mounted. Opts: (null)
[    7.710355] EXT4-fs (sda2): re-mounted. Opts: (null)
[    9.227365] EXT4-fs (sda1): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
[   10.685717] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
[   10.789404] RPC: Registered named UNIX socket transport module.
[   10.789411] RPC: Registered udp transport module.
[   10.789415] RPC: Registered tcp transport module.
[   10.789419] RPC: Registered tcp NFSv4.1 backchannel transport module.
[   10.802294] NET: Registered protocol family 17
[   10.832966] FS-Cache: Loaded
[   10.886960] FS-Cache: Netfs 'nfs' registered for caching
[   10.951772] Installing knfsd (copyright (C) 1996 okir@monad.swb.de).
[   12.242071] tg3 0000:40:00.0 eth0: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex
[   12.242078] tg3 0000:40:00.0 eth0: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX
[   12.242097] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
[   12.919842] lp: driver loaded but no devices found
[   13.211684] ppdev: user-space parallel port driver
[   20.378549] fglrx_pci 0000:06:00.0: irq 42 for MSI/MSI-X
[   20.380599] <6>[fglrx] Firegl kernel thread PID: 2736
[   20.380738] <6>[fglrx] Firegl kernel thread PID: 2737
[   20.380875] <6>[fglrx] Firegl kernel thread PID: 2738
[   20.381103] <6>[fglrx] IRQ 42 Enabled
[   20.406460] <6>[fglrx] Reserved FB block: Shared offset:0, size:1000000 
[   20.406465] <6>[fglrx] Reserved FB block: Unshared offset:f8ff000, size:3000 
[   20.406468] <6>[fglrx] Reserved FB block: Unshared offset:f902000, size:3fe000 
[   20.406472] <6>[fglrx] Reserved FB block: Unshared offset:1fff3000, size:d000 
[   20.479905] ACPI Error: [ATPX] Evaluation of object type [Mutex] is not supported (20120913/nseval-201)

veerain · 04-26-2015, 12:24 PM

You don't have to delete that error and in fact you can't.

And whether the produced error has to be worried about that I don't know. If everything is working nice then it may be ignored.

Or wait for other wise guys to post something.

VerticalSpin · 03-11-2019, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by veerain

You don't have to delete that error and in fact you can't.

And whether the produced error has to be worried about that I don't know. If everything is working nice then it may be ignored.

Or wait for other wise guys to post something.

You can mitigate this error. The kernel allows to upgrade ACPI tables from outside. So, basically the following has to be done in order to fix:
- dump the table from where this ID (ATPX) comes from (acpidump -o tables.dat)
- disassemble it (iasl -da ...)
- find the piece where it happen
- fix it accordingly
- assemble table back (iasl ...)
- create initrd with this new table attached (see Documentation/acpi/initrd_table_override.txt for the details)
- boot with new initrd

jsbjsb001 · 03-11-2019, 10:27 AM

Based on your error message, it seems like it's just an informational message rather than what I'd call an actual error message. So I wouldn't worry about it, unless, and as said, something isn't working properly/at all.

floppy_stuttgart · 03-23-2019, 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VerticalSpin

You can mitigate this error. The kernel allows to upgrade ACPI tables from outside. So, basically the following has to be done in order to fix:
- dump the table from where this ID (ATPX) comes from (acpidump -o tables.dat)
- disassemble it (iasl -da ...)
- find the piece where it happen
- fix it accordingly
- assemble table back (iasl ...)
- create initrd with this new table attached (see Documentation/acpi/initrd_table_override.txt for the details)
- boot with new initrd

After few time, I see new issues in dmesg with Debian 4.9.0-8-686-pae

Code:

[    0.146881] acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC: OS supports [ExtendedConfig ASPM ClockPM Segments MSI]
[    0.146890] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): \_SB.PCI0._OSC: Excess arguments - ASL declared 5, ACPI requires 4 (20160831/nsarguments-189)
[    0.147219] ACPI Error: [CAPD] Namespace lookup failure, AE_ALREADY_EXISTS (20160831/dsfield-211)
[    0.147513] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.PCI0._OSC] (Node f748c348), AE_ALREADY_EXISTS (20160831/psparse-543)
[    0.147886] acpi PNP0A08:00: _OSC failed (AE_ALREADY_EXISTS); disabling ASPM

Then according the recommendation, I look at https://lwn.net/Articles/237085/ and try to make that message going away.

acpidump >acpidump
acpixtract -a acpidump

Intel ACPI Component Architecture
ACPI Binary Table Extraction Utility version 20160831-32
Copyright (c) 2000 - 2016 Intel Corporation

Acpi table [SSDT] - 13390 bytes written to ssdt1.dat
Acpi table [MCFG] - 60 bytes written to mcfg.dat
Acpi table [ASF!] - 99 bytes written to asf!.dat
Acpi table [APIC] - 104 bytes written to apic.dat
Acpi table [DSDT] - 5107 bytes written to dsdt.dat
Acpi table [FACP] - 116 bytes written to facp.dat
Acpi table [FACS] - 64 bytes written to facs.dat
Acpi table [SSDT] - 1107 bytes written to ssdt2.dat

8 binary ACPI tables extracted

what "TABLE" should I look at? for iasl -d TABLE.dat
Any advice is welcome.
For the reason the PC dont have sound anymore, I am looking close at it again. Thanks!

mrmazda · 03-24-2019, 12:01 AM

It's not unusual to get ACPI errors from an old PC or one that has a flawed BIOS. Your GX280 is old. Did you ever update its BIOS? Mine has installed A08.

floppy_stuttgart · 03-24-2019, 06:14 AM

This is a Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq dc7100 USDT(DX877AV)/0980h, BIOS 786C1 v02.15 08/07/2008
Perhaps it makes no sense to try to further dig?
It works all fine; just no sound; perhaps due to another issue than ACPI.

floppy_stuttgart · 08-22-2021, 03:16 PM

I sold that PC to a guy who was happy to install Win XP on it ;-)
(I bought a replacement HP 600G4).
I did not ask for much money.