LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-14-2006, 02:36 PM   #1
SteveT
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: South East UK
Distribution: Fedora Core 16
Posts: 69

Rep: Reputation: 15
Wlan0 is DHCP, eth1 fixed IP


FC4 Gnome.
This is my fault.
I upgraded an old laptop with yum update. Fine.
I had forgotten that my network card (pcmcia USR 5410 using the acx100 drivers) had the drivers built separately and installed separately.
I was 'playing' with the laptop, trying to get a pcmcia firewire card working with Kino and my DV camcorder. I was not having much luck with the firewire so wanted the network card back in to get on the web to find the answer. The network card didn't work ,as the drivers weren't installed for the new kernel. Not realising this I removed my cards settings via the Desktop-System Settings-Network. I played around for a while - still no joy. Then it clicked. So I recompiled the acx drivers and re made the installation. Then I went back into the Desktop-System Settings-Network to redefine the card as eth1 (as I recollected it was). The odd thing is that I couldn't activate the card from here - I got (and still get):

3c574_cs device eth1 does not seem to be present, delaying initialization.

The 3c574 is the card I chose from the network adapter list - there isn't an ACX entry - so when I set this up before I chose the first pcmcia card on the list. When I rebooted, it showed the device as the correct TI ACX device (as it does in the hardware manager).

I rebooted, and the card came up ok (the red light on the card showed) and I can connect to the net ok.
The problem is that the settings defined in Desktop-blah (ie /etc/sysconfig/networking/devices/ifcfg-eth1) are ignored (well the fixed IP is) and the card is coming up as DHCP. I have NetworkManager/Info running and that seems to be controlling(?) the card ok.

iwconfig shows wlan0 rather than eth1 - I could have sworn that when I first got this card running, iwconfig showed eth1 as being wireless.

Any ideas what the heck I've either missed or screwed up? Where are the settings for wlan0 stored?

The card is working, its just I'd like to have the option of DHCP and the flexibility of setting the 'other' parameters via the Desktop-blah gui.

Sorry about this reading like War and Peace...
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
change ipw220 interface name from eth1 to wlan0 zen0n Linux - Laptop and Netbook 3 08-23-2005 01:55 PM
wlan0 appears as eth1 and can't get an ip kovermours Linux - Wireless Networking 7 09-13-2004 04:55 PM
wireless eth1 to wlan0? ferreter Fedora 0 09-11-2004 02:19 PM
ethernet bridge (wlan0 eth1) - canīt ping magicien Linux - Wireless Networking 0 07-05-2004 03:59 AM
how do i rename wlan0 to eth1 laclac01 Linux - Networking 2 06-10-2004 05:31 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration