LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-28-2003, 11:17 AM   #1
odious1
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 252

Rep: Reputation: 30
Please help with collisions


I have set up a RH7.2 machine as a file server on a network where all the client hosts are either Win98 or XPpro. I have gotten samba working to the point that all the shares are available. The prolbem is that the network is much more sluggish than it used to be. When if ifconfig it shows 135613 collisions. I have never seen this many before. What could be wrong? Is this an obnormal amount for a network of 10 machines connected with an active hub? If this isn't abnormal what else could be causing poor performance

Thanks
Tom

eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0C:76:18:77E
inet addr:192.168.0.29 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:793695 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:1
TX packets:893519 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:139041 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:95402990 (90.9 Mb) TX bytes:679907443 (648.4 Mb)
Interrupt:11 Base address:0xcc00
 
Old 07-28-2003, 01:51 PM   #2
chort
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Silicon Valley, USA
Distribution: OpenBSD 4.6, OS X 10.6.2, CentOS 4 & 5
Posts: 3,660

Rep: Reputation: 76
Is it a 10BaseT hub, or 100BaseT hub? That will make a difference. If you force set the media type on any cards, remember they should be half-duplex when connecting to a hub.

I would suggest running Ethereal or tcpdump and check for multicast and broadcast traffic. Too much of either will cause a ton of collisions.
 
Old 07-28-2003, 02:45 PM   #3
odious1
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 252

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Chort,

Thanks for the help. All my cable is cat5. One hub is 100T and one is 10T. Some of the nics are 10/100 and some are 10. I did not see many broadcast packets when I looked at tcpdmp; unless I do not know what I am looking for? I do not think I am doing anything to cause full duplex; am I?

Thanks
Tom

AcerWarehouse.mshome.net.1025: . 170499:171959(1460) ack 11141 win 5840NBT Packet (DF)
15:18:00.158423 192.168.0.29.netbios-ssn > AcerWarehouse.mshome.net.1025: P 171959:172551(592) ack 11141 win 5840NBT Packet (DF)
15:18:00.168423 AcerWarehouse.mshome.net.1025 > 192.168.0.29.netbios-ssn: . ack 172551 win 5840 (DF)
15:18:00.218423 AcerWarehouse.mshome.net.1025 > 192.168.0.29.netbios-ssn: P 11141:11196(55) ack 172551 win 5840NBT Packet (DF)
15:18:00.218423 192.168.0.29.netbios-ssn > AcerWarehouse.mshome.net.1025: . 172551:174011(1460) ack 11196 win 5840NBT Packet (DF)
15:18:00.218423 192.168.0.29.netbios-ssn > AcerWarehouse.mshome.net.1025: P 174011:174603(592) ack 11196 win 5840NBT Packet (DF)
15:18:00.218423 AcerWarehouse.mshome.net.1025 > 192.168.0.29.netbios-ssn: . ack 174603 win 5840 (DF)
15:18:00.218423 AcerWarehouse.mshome.net.1025 > 192.168.0.29.netbios-ssn: P 11196:11290(94) ack 174603 win 5840NBT Packet (DF)
15:18:00.218423 192.168.0.29.netbios-ssn > AcerWarehouse.mshome.net.1025: P 174603:174654(51) ack 11290 win 5840NBT Packet (DF)
15:18:00.218423 AcerWarehouse.mshome.net.1025 > 192.168.0.29.netbios-ssn: P 11290:11345(55) ack 174654 win 5789NBT Packet (DF)
15:18:00.218423 192.168.0.29.netbios-ssn > AcerWarehouse.mshome.net.1025: . 174654:176114(1460) ack 11345 win 5840NBT Packet (DF)
15:18:00.218423 192.168.0.29.netbios-ssn > AcerWarehouse.mshome.net.1025: P 176114:176706(592) ack 11345 win 5840NBT Packet (DF)
15:18:00.218423 msi-office.mshome.net.1053 > SERVER.mshome.net.2869: . ack 29475 win 16341 (DF)
15:18:00.228423 AcerWarehouse.mshome.net.1025 > 192.168.0.29.netbios-ssn: . ack 176706 win 5840 (DF)
 
Old 07-28-2003, 03:09 PM   #4
Corin
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Jette, Brussels Hoofstedelijk Gewest
Distribution: Debian sid, RedHat 9, Suse 8.2
Posts: 446

Rep: Reputation: 31
Do the sensible thing and update your network to 100 MB/s only, and it is always better to use switches rather than hubs.

The price of these things are not prohibitive unlike a few years ago.

The collisions arise from the traffic on your network exceeding the capacity (bandwidth) of your network.

Last edited by Corin; 07-28-2003 at 03:11 PM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
collisions and samba.... Basslord1124 Linux - Networking 5 03-20-2005 09:52 PM
Collisions on hub Jestrik Linux - Networking 2 04-01-2004 12:07 PM
what causes collisions red118a Linux - Networking 3 02-19-2004 07:22 PM
collisions frostmagic Programming 4 02-06-2004 03:03 PM
what are resource collisions? quantumechanix Linux - Newbie 2 01-18-2003 09:13 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration