make sure nordvpn is main route for ethernet and wlan0

LinuxNub1 · 12-12-2020, 08:34 PM

Lznznzznz

zylox89 · 12-13-2020, 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LinuxNub1

hello,

when using airdump-ng and airplay-ng

how do i know if kali linux is using nord vpn ip and making sure my real internet ip is safe? i know over ethernet when loading browser it shows nord ip

but when i use my ac realtek wifi usb in monitor mode.. and use airdump airplay how do i know its hidden behind nordvpn also whether enabled as managed or monitored?

here is what i get with traceroute and ifconfig.. is it already working correctly or no? If not how can i make sure no matter what Nord vpn will be default gateway or make it so my wifi usb isnt going to expose my real ip?

here ill paste my input below. im new to linux and this is just for fun ! It's practice. just being safe. trying to learn since im going into cyber sec field

nord vpn on kali linux with usb realtek wifi on m0nitor mode

└─$ route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
0.0.0.0 10.8.0.1 128.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 tun0
default 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 100 0 0 eth0
10.8.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 tun0
128.0.0.0 10.8.0.1 128.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 tun0
152.89.204.174 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 100 0 0 eth0

with nord vpn on and wlan0 realtek wifi usb off and put to"down"

└─$ route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
0.0.0.0 10.8.0.1 128.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 tun0
default 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 100 0 0 eth0
10.8.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 tun0
128.0.0.0 10.8.0.1 128.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 tun0
152.89.204.174 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 100 0 0 eth0

if config with wlan0 on up & monitor mode with nordvpn on

└─$ ifconfig
eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.158 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
ether d8:cb:8a:bf:de:97 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 38421 bytes 28114338 (26.8 MiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 30729 bytes 6050917 (5.7 MiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device interrupt 20 memory 0xfb300000-fb320000

lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
loop txqueuelen 1000 (Local Loopback)
RX packets 77 bytes 5321 (5.1 KiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 77 bytes 5321 (5.1 KiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0

tun0: flags=4305<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 10.8.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 destination 10.8.0.2
unspec 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 txqueuelen 100 (UNSPEC)
RX packets 36819 bytes 25332933 (24.1 MiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 30409 bytes 3862650 (3.6 MiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 495 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0

wlan0: flags=803<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,PROMISC,ALLMULTI> mtu 2312
unspec 4A-D3-2E-50-87-9F-00-8D-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 txqueuelen 1000 (UNSPEC)
RX packets 74543 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 70462 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0

thanks!

Well you have shared the right thing buddy, have tested it and all the config was done good, cheers to share

computersavvy · 12-13-2020, 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zylox89

Well you have shared the right thing buddy, have tested it and all the config was done good, cheers to share

link to myestub.online in message. advertising spam reported.

crts · 12-14-2020, 04:50 PM

And the original post was also deleted by OP. Probably a new tactic to avoid detection. Reported OP, too, since OP and the other zylox89 are probably working together.

EDIT: I just noticed zylox89 answered twice. The first answer had the quote with the spamlinks edited in, the second answer quoted the (probably) unaltered initial post. A further attempt to hide the spamlinks. They are getting more creative ...

TB0ne · 12-17-2020, 08:11 AM

Yep, and zylox89 also removed a spam link in his other post, probably thinking they're not going to get banned. This whole thread needs to be deleted.

LinuxNub1 · 12-18-2020, 05:30 AM

Please don’t delete. Just lock if any admins see this ... this was actually a bait test to see if my neighbor above me was trying or did infact tap my modem through drilling hole through his bedroom wall above me! Keep ! I just proved it ! Anyone here feel free ic3 gov him for me also !

I’m not trolling. Sadly fuckers my neighbor. But he’s my enemy. I knew he was hacking my line. And this proves it! Lock n archive. Don’t delete. You will see! And I deleted it because I was just trying to see if infact the neighbor tapped my line ! And tried to delete this thread after. He then replied and looks like he did put links in. Should I call police ? I talked to isp they said it’s impossible which I know is bs. So ic3 give zylox. His real name is Aaron don’t know last. He lives above me. I’m probably gonna have call our community security. If not I guess police

Thanks for proving it zylox. Aaron u big foot walking loser. I found out earlier yesterday morning same vincity as me another neighbor. We r in condos. Was ransomwared. So that’s even more evidence he is a sicko and will hack anyone. Including neighbors and friends ! !!!

Zylox88 = Aaron above neighbor. I think his moms 3rd boyfriend this last 6 months is involved too. His name only know first. = Grant

teckk · 12-18-2020, 08:10 AM

If you are serious.

Walk away from the computer, go outside and get some fresh air.

Quote:

infact tap my modem through drilling hole through his bedroom wall above me!

This is silly. You splice into an ethernet cable and you will ruin it, at least cause a severe slowdown in speed. And then, how is he authenticating against your ISP without the ISP hardware. Most all of them use some sort of digital certificate embedded in the device, to stay connected.

You are watching too many hacking movies.

If your neighbor cracks your wireless WEP setup then he could possibly use your wireless connection, if that is so then, change it.

Quote:

Should I call police

Call your doctor first. No shame in getting some medical help when one needs it.