LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-03-2004, 04:36 PM   #1
suse_linux9.1
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question lame nameservers in redhat 7.3


Hi there,

I'm trying to get my name servers working in redhat 7.3 using bind 9.2.0.

I have everything working well in Suse Linux 9.1, so basically I just copied the zone file for my domain over, but I'm now getting lame nameservers.

(Please bare with me I'm a newbie

(DNSreport.com/tools/dnsreport.c...phil-keaggy.com)

Here is what my zone file looks like:

(it is in var/named and is called (phil-keaggy.com.zone), note: I tried renaming it to just phil-keaggy.com and didn't have any luck)

$TTL 2D
@ IN SOA ns1.phil-keaggy.com. webmaster.mediareaction.com. (
2004053111 ; serial
1H ; refresh
1H ; retry
1W ; expiry
1D ) ; minimum

@ IN NS ns1.phil-keaggy.com.
@ IN NS ns2.phil-keaggy.com.
@ IN A 24.80.196.197
@ IN MX 10 phil-keaggy.com.
ns1 IN A 24.80.196.197
ns2 IN A 24.80.196.197
www IN CNAME phil-keaggy.com.
ftp IN CNAME phil-keaggy.com.

Here is my named.conf file, it seems very similar to the one in Suse Linux.

## named.conf - configuration for bind
#
# Generated automatically by bindconf, alchemist et al.
controls {
inet 127.0.0.1 allow { localhost; } keys { rndckey; };
};

include "/etc/rndc.key";

options {
directory "/var/named/";
};


zone "." {
type hint;
file "named.ca";
};


zone "0.0.127.in-addr.arpa" {
type master;
file "0.0.127.in-addr.arpa.zone";
};


zone "localhost" {
type master;
file "localhost.zone";
};
zone "phil-keaggy.com" {
type master;
file "phil-keaggy.com";
};

Basically my question is, what is the difference? How come I'm now getting lame nameservers, now that I switched to redhat 7.3?

Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks
 
Old 06-03-2004, 05:17 PM   #2
MS3FGX
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: NJ, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 5,852

Rep: Reputation: 361Reputation: 361Reputation: 361Reputation: 361
Oh, the topic title is priceless. And so true.
 
Old 06-03-2004, 05:45 PM   #3
suse_linux9.1
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 5

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Question

Well they are definately lame. heh.

Is there any solution to this?

Or Should I just go back to Suse?
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nameservers and registering them Q mpower Linux - Networking 2 03-30-2005 07:13 PM
Nameservers -- must I use my ISP's? Apollo77 Linux - Networking 5 03-09-2004 12:45 PM
Registering nameservers Polaris2203 Linux - Networking 7 09-15-2003 08:13 PM
The frustration of nameservers being down jobokoth Linux - General 3 08-20-2003 04:22 AM
nameservers.... Config Linux - Networking 2 01-19-2003 06:26 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration