Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I want to separate my work traffic from my home traffic
using a Class B IP address something like 172.16.000.000/12.
Clearly my access points and router boxes will use Class-B configuration
for all of my work things.
Can someone help me sort out Route Table Entries or other
LAN configuration details so that this works reasonably well?
Some issues that I have no idea how to address:
there won't be any DMZ servers in Phase-I deployment
my primary access point/router will need to interact with the Class-C primary router.
my Class-B devices need to access some Class-C printers or resources
some Class-C resources need to access some Class-B printers or resources
mobile & hand-held devices need to work everywhere but do so securely
Will I need, or is it a preferred deployment, to have a configured DNS in either the Class-C or the Class-B LAN?
Thanks in advance,
~~~ 0;-Dan
Last edited by SaintDanBert; 08-28-2020 at 02:28 PM.
Reason: clarification
I don't know enough to proffer any suggestions, but I can point you to the best tutorial on subnetting I have ever seen. I hope it will give you some hints.
Don't be put off by the HTML 3.0 formatting. When I first encountered it, it was on a *.edu site. My best guess is that the author retired or left academia and put it up on his personal website.
Unless you're planning on deploying a large network with many hosts, then two small subnets is likely all you require for a typical SOHO network. For example, 192.168.2.0/25, and 192.168.2.128/25 would provide for 126 hosts each! The class you choose is unlikely to matter in the context of separating two networks for home and office use. You may need to clarify further if your requirements/reasons are different than speculated.
Many home routers would be very limited in what they could provide, so I'd recommend using a small business/enterprise grade router. No need for top-end (unless your budget allows it). For example, an Ubiquiti or Mikrotik device would probably suffice, or at least a router running DD-WRT or OpenWRT for configuration purposes.
Unless you're planning on deploying a large network with many hosts, then two small subnets is likely all you require for a typical SOHO network. For example, 192.168.2.0/25, and 192.168.2.128/25 would provide for 126 hosts each! The class you choose is unlikely to matter in the context of separating two networks for home and office use. You may need to clarify further if your requirements/reasons are different than speculated.
Many home routers would be very limited in what they could provide, so I'd recommend using a small business/enterprise grade router. No need for top-end (unless your budget allows it). For example, an Ubiquiti or Mikrotik device would probably suffice, or at least a router running DD-WRT or OpenWRT for configuration purposes.
Say that I have two subnets: 192.168.1.xxx for all of those out-of-box network gadgets and toys and 192.168.10.xxx for real work (mostly). Won't I need route table entries so that my wife 1.xxx iDevice can access my high-end 10.xxx printer and similar situations?
Yes, the router should be configured to route traffic between the two subnets.
Where do I find a good tutorial on creating the required route table entries?
I think that the internalroute table entries would enable SUB-A to talk with SUB-B and enable SUB-B to talk with SUB-A. I would expect that the gateway would enable both SUB-A and SUB-B to talk with the outside world with a suitable firewall. I worked with this stuff years {decades} ago but have forgotten most of what I knew then.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.