Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have SMTP and POP servers running on 2 different servers (machines), DNS Server runs on a third server. Now I need to bring down the SMTP server to make some hardware changes.
What I am doing is
bringing up the SMTP service on the POP server and change the DNS setting on the DNS Server to point to the POP server
then bring down the SMTP service and make the necessary changes
change the DNS setting again on the DNS Server to point to the orginal SMTP server
shut down the SMTP service on the POP server
Am I doing this right? And are there any better ways to do it?
Am I doing this right? And are there any better ways to do it?
Looks OK to me but I think it would be more efficient to add another MX record. This way when a remote MTA seeks your MX and can't connect to the first one it'll automagically use the next one.
Looks OK to me but I think it would be more efficient to add another MX record. This way when a remote MTA seeks your MX and can't connect to the first one it'll automagically use the next one.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.