LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking
User Name
Password
Linux - Networking This forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-28-2005, 11:57 PM   #1
Devbmx
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 35

Rep: Reputation: 15
Hooking two computers up to each other possible?


allright heres my question, i have two computers. i want to connect them to each other with as fast of a data tansfer between them as i can possibly get, without putting an OS on computer2's HD, or using any of its space. both computers have slow processors, and very small HD's. the reason for doing this is i want to use them combined as a server. so is it possible to do so without using an ethernet connect. maybe use of a USB, or COM or printer port. or even connecting the ide from computer2 to computer1? any suggestions would be much appreciated thanks
 
Old 03-01-2005, 12:54 AM   #2
Quis
Member
 
Registered: May 2001
Location: Germany, Süd-Baden
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 139

Rep: Reputation: 15
Re: Hooking two computers up to each other possible?

This is impossible. The 2th machine don't know how to write stuff on his HD.
Why don't you put both HDs in one Machine and use "one" Server.
 
Old 03-01-2005, 01:26 AM   #3
Artanicus
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Finland
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, Gentoo, Slackware
Posts: 827

Rep: Reputation: 31
the best choise that comes to my mind, is installing a very small linux distro on the 2nd comp with just basic networking && portmapper && nfsd and then using the partitions over NFS in a LAN environment.. But I guess thats not an option based on your conditions..

As the previous poster said, easier to just hook em up in a single machine..
 
Old 03-01-2005, 01:45 AM   #4
pevelius
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Tampere, Finland
Distribution: Debian, Familiar, OS X
Posts: 145

Rep: Reputation: 16
you can boot both machines from a live cd to save hd space, then enable usb networking.that way you can use all the capasity from your hd:s.
 
Old 03-01-2005, 01:48 AM   #5
Artanicus
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Finland
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, Gentoo, Slackware
Posts: 827

Rep: Reputation: 31
Quote:
Originally posted by pevelius
you can boot both machines from a live cd to save hd space, then enable usb networking.that way you can use all the capasity from your hd:s.
Yeah, this could work, but youd need a decent amout of ram to get it fast enough.. Atleast 32mb.. 64 better.. relevance depends on how you define "slow computer with small hdd"
 
Old 03-01-2005, 01:50 AM   #6
Devbmx
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 35

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
the 1st computer has a distro on it, the second i wana keep free and use the HD for swap (because its on a 200mhz processor) and still use the 2nd computers processor =/ so you think about the only way possible is by using a live cd to enable soemthing such as distcc on the second computer?
 
Old 03-01-2005, 01:53 AM   #7
Artanicus
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Finland
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, Gentoo, Slackware
Posts: 827

Rep: Reputation: 31
excuse me, but if you use comp2:s hdd2 for swap for comp1, what have you got left to use cpu2 for? d:
 
Old 03-01-2005, 07:12 AM   #8
Devbmx
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 35

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
i just wana ink as much speed as i possibly can from both computers

**EDIT
also the s3econd computer has about 64mb of ram, im not exactly sure what processor it is, it just claims its a pentium at boot.

Last edited by Devbmx; 03-01-2005 at 07:31 AM.
 
Old 03-01-2005, 08:54 AM   #9
frieza
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: harvard, il
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.4,DD-WRT micro plus ssh,lfs-6.6,Fedora 15,Fedora 16
Posts: 3,233

Rep: Reputation: 406Reputation: 406Reputation: 406Reputation: 406Reputation: 406
you seem to be forgetting something.. even gigabit ethernet isn't anywhere near fast enough for a reliable swap... and 200Mhz machines probably have 10, or 100 megabit ethernet....
there are some network cards that have a bootable bios
look up pxe complient NICs
then you'd have to set up a bootp/dhcp/nfs server. i've never actually succeded yet, because i don't have any pxe nics, but it's a thought... then you could setup a diskless machine
 
Old 03-01-2005, 09:49 AM   #10
Darin
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Portland, OR USA
Distribution: Slackware, SLAX, Gentoo, RH/Fedora
Posts: 1,024

Rep: Reputation: 45
frieza is right, a 100M or 1G ethernet connection won't even have the speed for a network mounted swap and other viable options (USB, Parallel, Serial) are slower still not to mention usually trickier to set up.

The PXE setup might be a good way to get connected (over ethernet) but that would have to be set up to boot some kind of networkable OS over the network. Although mounting a swap partition over the network isn't going to add performance there are distributed computing/clustering options available. Unfortunatly, unless you already have PXE and clustering down it's probably more hassle than it's worth to get a 200Mhz machine hooked into another computer to use it's speed or disks.
 
Old 03-01-2005, 11:27 AM   #11
frieza
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: harvard, il
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.4,DD-WRT micro plus ssh,lfs-6.6,Fedora 15,Fedora 16
Posts: 3,233

Rep: Reputation: 406Reputation: 406Reputation: 406Reputation: 406Reputation: 406
i somewhat agree with darin on that... although I personally would try getting those machines setup with pxe or clustering as a learning tool, simply because it would be preferable to expend a 200MHZ machine than a brand new amd64
 
Old 03-01-2005, 11:31 AM   #12
Devbmx
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 35

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
you're right, i was so tired las tnight i didnt think about the fact that swap over network isnt gonna really do anything. so im gonna put it in the first box...so basically theres no way for me to utilize the second computers processor? also on the case of using a livecd to maybe set the other box as networkable, would knoppix come with everything i would need to do this?

Last edited by Devbmx; 03-01-2005 at 11:35 AM.
 
Old 03-01-2005, 11:49 AM   #13
IsaacKuo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Distribution: Debian Stable
Posts: 2,546
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465
Take a look at ClusterKnoppix and Quantian. These are two Knoppix variants which feature OpenMosix. These have the ability to migrate running programs from one system to another (within the same cluster). You can run your better computer as a graphical workstation, while the second computer runs in plain text mode to conserve memory.
 
Old 03-01-2005, 01:34 PM   #14
frieza
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: harvard, il
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.4,DD-WRT micro plus ssh,lfs-6.6,Fedora 15,Fedora 16
Posts: 3,233

Rep: Reputation: 406Reputation: 406Reputation: 406Reputation: 406Reputation: 406
anohter solution, if you have money to sink into anew hard drive is use the less powerfull computer as a file server, i do that with an old 100MHZ pentium computer
 
Old 03-01-2005, 05:45 PM   #15
thorn168
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Vector Linux 5.1 Std., Vector Linux 5.8 Std., Win2k, XP, OS X (10.4 & 10.5)
Posts: 344

Rep: Reputation: 42
Sounds like you want to create a virtual server out of two older and slower computers.

Old hard is not sufficient for this purpose. Virtual servers and cluster servers require more then what hand me down PCs have inside.

I am in agreement with the other posters here about the intended hard disk usage you wish to use.

My suggestion is that you set up the slower PC as a router, firewall or dare I suggest this...a Tarpit.

Then you should think about purchasing a new or even used HD which is larger then the ones currently installed.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
interrupt hooking in linux fuzzyBuzz Programming 1 09-21-2005 06:20 PM
Hooking a TV as a monitor SimpleLinuxuser Linux - Hardware 2 02-05-2005 04:16 PM
Hooking up Linux to Cable Surfin'Gumby Linux - Networking 10 05-25-2004 07:32 AM
hooking up to internet w/ LAN studpenguin Linux - Newbie 6 12-18-2003 03:25 AM
Hooking a modem to two computers via a broadband router Travis86 Linux - Networking 5 01-18-2003 10:21 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration