Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
allright heres my question, i have two computers. i want to connect them to each other with as fast of a data tansfer between them as i can possibly get, without putting an OS on computer2's HD, or using any of its space. both computers have slow processors, and very small HD's. the reason for doing this is i want to use them combined as a server. so is it possible to do so without using an ethernet connect. maybe use of a USB, or COM or printer port. or even connecting the ide from computer2 to computer1? any suggestions would be much appreciated thanks
the best choise that comes to my mind, is installing a very small linux distro on the 2nd comp with just basic networking && portmapper && nfsd and then using the partitions over NFS in a LAN environment.. But I guess thats not an option based on your conditions..
As the previous poster said, easier to just hook em up in a single machine..
Originally posted by pevelius you can boot both machines from a live cd to save hd space, then enable usb networking.that way you can use all the capasity from your hd:s.
Yeah, this could work, but youd need a decent amout of ram to get it fast enough.. Atleast 32mb.. 64 better.. relevance depends on how you define "slow computer with small hdd"
the 1st computer has a distro on it, the second i wana keep free and use the HD for swap (because its on a 200mhz processor) and still use the 2nd computers processor =/ so you think about the only way possible is by using a live cd to enable soemthing such as distcc on the second computer?
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.4,DD-WRT micro plus ssh,lfs-6.6,Fedora 15,Fedora 16
Posts: 3,233
Rep:
you seem to be forgetting something.. even gigabit ethernet isn't anywhere near fast enough for a reliable swap... and 200Mhz machines probably have 10, or 100 megabit ethernet....
there are some network cards that have a bootable bios
look up pxe complient NICs
then you'd have to set up a bootp/dhcp/nfs server. i've never actually succeded yet, because i don't have any pxe nics, but it's a thought... then you could setup a diskless machine
frieza is right, a 100M or 1G ethernet connection won't even have the speed for a network mounted swap and other viable options (USB, Parallel, Serial) are slower still not to mention usually trickier to set up.
The PXE setup might be a good way to get connected (over ethernet) but that would have to be set up to boot some kind of networkable OS over the network. Although mounting a swap partition over the network isn't going to add performance there are distributed computing/clustering options available. Unfortunatly, unless you already have PXE and clustering down it's probably more hassle than it's worth to get a 200Mhz machine hooked into another computer to use it's speed or disks.
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.4,DD-WRT micro plus ssh,lfs-6.6,Fedora 15,Fedora 16
Posts: 3,233
Rep:
i somewhat agree with darin on that... although I personally would try getting those machines setup with pxe or clustering as a learning tool, simply because it would be preferable to expend a 200MHZ machine than a brand new amd64
you're right, i was so tired las tnight i didnt think about the fact that swap over network isnt gonna really do anything. so im gonna put it in the first box...so basically theres no way for me to utilize the second computers processor? also on the case of using a livecd to maybe set the other box as networkable, would knoppix come with everything i would need to do this?
Take a look at ClusterKnoppix and Quantian. These are two Knoppix variants which feature OpenMosix. These have the ability to migrate running programs from one system to another (within the same cluster). You can run your better computer as a graphical workstation, while the second computer runs in plain text mode to conserve memory.
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.4,DD-WRT micro plus ssh,lfs-6.6,Fedora 15,Fedora 16
Posts: 3,233
Rep:
anohter solution, if you have money to sink into anew hard drive is use the less powerfull computer as a file server, i do that with an old 100MHZ pentium computer
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.