LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-24-2007, 12:39 PM   #1
jacksmash
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 269

Rep: Reputation: 30
which wireless card to use?


hey all,

i'm going to pick up a wireless card (PCI) for my PC, and I'm wondering what I should get that will install the easiest and work well. The reason I ask is because I've never been successful with wrapping the windows drivers on my laptop, and so I want to get something that will give me few headaches.

I appreciate any opinions on this.

Cheers.
 
Old 02-24-2007, 12:48 PM   #2
reddazz
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 77
You could get something with a ralink chipset. The drivers are available at serialmonkey.com. The GNU site has a list of cards that have the ralink chipsets.
 
Old 02-24-2007, 12:52 PM   #3
jacksmash
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 269

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. I'll read all of those links thoroughly and see how I make out.

Thanks again!
 
Old 02-24-2007, 12:54 PM   #4
Quakeboy02
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Distribution: Debian Linux 11 (Bullseye)
Posts: 3,407

Rep: Reputation: 141Reputation: 141
Atheros, Atheros, Atheros. Madwifi rules!
 
Old 02-24-2007, 01:45 PM   #5
GamerX
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 102

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I have an atheros card as well, and no complaints about it or the drivers.

Make sure you have a look at the HCL (http://www.linuxquestions.org/hcl/)
 
Old 02-24-2007, 05:02 PM   #6
Electro
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,042

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I suggest any PCMCIA (aka PC Card) wireless NIC that is Atheros based. Internal mini-PCI wireless NIC do not have the same sensitivity as external devices.

IMHO, people are idiots when they are considering of buying a wireless NIC for the desktop. Use a wired NIC because they are reliable, stable, easy to setup, faster, secure, and majority of the models work with out any problems.
 
Old 02-24-2007, 05:27 PM   #7
Quakeboy02
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Distribution: Debian Linux 11 (Bullseye)
Posts: 3,407

Rep: Reputation: 141Reputation: 141
"IMHO, people are idiots when they are considering of buying a wireless NIC for the desktop."

I think you overstate your case. My router is in the other room, down the hallway, next to the TV. I have two linux boxes in my computer room. I am not going to drill holes in the floor or in the wall to install a CAT-5 to reach the router, nor am I going to lay a wire down the hallway. A wireless card in both my boxes makes an optimal solution for me. For high-speed file sharing I do have my two linux boxes wired together, as well. OTOH, I do highly recommend wireless bridges for the newbie, due to their simplicity of connection.
 
Old 02-24-2007, 06:15 PM   #8
jacksmash
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 269

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by Electro
IMHO, people are idiots when they are considering of buying a wireless NIC for the desktop.
I appreciate that compliment.

I'm simply in a situation where a wired NIC is not possible.
 
Old 02-24-2007, 06:26 PM   #9
Electro
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,042

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I drilled holes through the closet to fish CAT-5e cable through rooms and the attic. It is a lot of work, but it is a lot safer than wireless networks. The only time I see the cable is from the closet. Few rooms have an Ethernet outlet box.
 
Old 02-24-2007, 07:43 PM   #10
Emerson
LQ Sage
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Saint Amant, Acadiana
Distribution: Gentoo ~amd64
Posts: 7,661

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
It's safer indeed. But also more reliable. Go wireless only if you must - i. e. for mobile devices. I agree with Electro, people are idiots, they do not know how radio works. It's an engineering nightmare to have multiple wireless devices working in proximity. Interference, congestion, etc. Wireless will never replace wires.

Last edited by Emerson; 02-24-2007 at 07:45 PM.
 
Old 02-24-2007, 08:40 PM   #11
jacksmash
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 269

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I'm still not sure what the purpose is of labeling people as 'idiots'? Knowledge is relative anyways.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Linux supported wireless card driver for Linksys wireless-g adaptor? northcoastrat Linux - Desktop 4 07-18-2008 06:33 PM
netgear ma311 wireless card will not talk to actiontec wired/wireless router tzonga1 Linux - Wireless Networking 2 02-10-2007 05:52 PM
intel wireless pro 2200 detected as atheros wireless card? whf SUSE / openSUSE 5 08-29-2005 06:04 PM
FC2 not recognizing the Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG wireless card mdslf Linux - Laptop and Netbook 2 08-24-2004 02:25 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration