Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux? |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
04-09-2005, 08:33 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 7
Rep:
|
Mounting NTFS in Fedora core 3
I have recently moved two 200gig maxtor drives into my fedora core 3 server. The first one is on the primary ide secondary and i plugged it in and i mounted hdb1 which was successful.
However after putting the second one in, on the boot screen linux recognises it is there and is drive hdc, however it does not appear in the /dev folder like all my other drives.
And when i try to mount it it says it cannot find hdc1
I have install the ntfs support and it works on the other drive, if anyone could help would be appreciated!
|
|
|
04-09-2005, 11:41 AM
|
#2
|
LQ Guru
Registered: May 2003
Location: INDIA
Distribution: Ubuntu, Solaris,CentOS
Posts: 5,522
Rep:
|
hi there
run
fdisk -l
to check what partitons are there
and then try mounting
regards
|
|
|
04-09-2005, 12:43 PM
|
#3
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 7
Original Poster
Rep:
|
ah thanks for the reply, should have already mentioned
I have tried this but it the new drive (hdc) doesn't appear in this,
Disk /dev/hda: 81.9 GB, 81964302336 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 9964 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 * 1 13 104391 83 Linux
/dev/hda2 14 9899 79409295 83 Linux
/dev/hda3 9900 9964 522112+ 82 Linux swap
Disk /dev/hdb: 203.9 GB, 203928109056 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 24792 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hdb1 * 1 24792 199141708+ 7 HPFS/NTFS
any more ideas?
cheers
|
|
|
04-09-2005, 01:33 PM
|
#4
|
LQ Guru
Registered: May 2003
Location: INDIA
Distribution: Ubuntu, Solaris,CentOS
Posts: 5,522
Rep:
|
what do u get on
fdisk /dev/hdc
regards
|
|
|
04-09-2005, 01:56 PM
|
#5
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 7
Original Poster
Rep:
|
sorry....
Unable to open /dev/hdc
|
|
|
04-09-2005, 02:22 PM
|
#6
|
LQ Guru
Registered: May 2003
Location: INDIA
Distribution: Ubuntu, Solaris,CentOS
Posts: 5,522
Rep:
|
is that a new hard disk??
|
|
|
04-09-2005, 02:27 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Suse 8.1
Posts: 102
Rep:
|
Check the jumpering on the disk - and see if the BIOS actually sees the disk.
Another "issues"
Make sure it's got powere, and the plug is tightly inserted
Same for IDE cable.
Make sure you only have two IDE devices on each IDE chain......
If fdisk can't see it, then it's most likely not getting power....or it's conflicting with another device.
Niall.
|
|
|
04-09-2005, 02:28 PM
|
#8
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 7
Original Poster
Rep:
|
well its a bout a week old.
I formatted it in windows..silly me and filled it with tv programs but i dont have a spare 200 gigs to move the stuff too to reformat.
Then i set up my server and decided to move them to it
|
|
|
04-09-2005, 02:31 PM
|
#9
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 7
Original Poster
Rep:
|
bios see's it, hard disk is set up as a master, dvd drive is a slave.
in the boot up screen it shows hdc as a maxtor...bla bla bla
it just doesnt see it in fdisk.
have tried restarting but no luck still...
|
|
|
04-09-2005, 02:33 PM
|
#10
|
LQ Guru
Registered: May 2003
Location: INDIA
Distribution: Ubuntu, Solaris,CentOS
Posts: 5,522
Rep:
|
hi there
can u still access that in windows
also have u made that as a basic disk or dynamic disk??if u have formated that from winXP/200
regards
|
|
|
04-09-2005, 02:45 PM
|
#11
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 7
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I think its a basic disk, the same format as the other one.
I havn't tried using it windows since but i hope it does! becos i'd b pretty upset loosing 200 gigs of tv !
|
|
|
04-09-2005, 02:52 PM
|
#12
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Suse 8.1
Posts: 102
Rep:
|
formatting shouldn't matter.
Try moving it to a different IDE chain. Or, if you have a firewire/USB enclosure...put it in there.....
And you definitely want it jumpered as slave if it's not the only drive in the machine which from your other post, it's not.
Jumper it as slave....not CS.
|
|
|
04-09-2005, 03:26 PM
|
#13
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Seymour, Indiana
Distribution: Distribution: RHEL 5 with Pieces of this and that.
Kernel 2.6.23.1, KDE 3.5.8 and KDE 4.0 beta, Plu
Posts: 5,700
Rep:
|
What is in your current /etc/fstab. Make sure /dev/hdc is not being used by something else.
Brian1
" Google the Linux way @ http://www.google.com/linux "
|
|
|
04-09-2005, 03:36 PM
|
#14
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 7
Original Poster
Rep:
|
# This file is edited by fstab-sync - see 'man fstab-sync' for details
LABEL=/ / ext3 defaults 1 1
LABEL=/boot /boot ext3 defaults 1 2
none /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0
none /proc proc defaults 0 0
none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
/dev/hda3 swap swap defaults 0 0
:/dev/hdc1 /mnt/drive2 ntfs ro,defaults,umask=0222 0 0
/dev/hdb1 /mnt/drive1 ntfs ro,defaults,umask=0222 0 0
/dev/hdd /media/cdrom auto pamconsole,exec,noauto,managed 0 0
the line /dev/hdb1 is one i created for my other drive which works fine, and the line which is commented out /dev/hdc1 is the one i made for my next drive, however it just displays an error at boot if the comment is removed.
Cheers everyone for your help, much appreicated !!
i will try taking the dvd drive off the ide cable later, but ftp'ing a load of files for a couple of hours so can't turn it off!
|
|
|
04-09-2005, 03:38 PM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Olympia, WA, USA
Distribution: Fedora, (K)Ubuntu
Posts: 4,187
|
Quote:
Originally posted by alexsmith2k
bios see's it, hard disk is set up as a master, dvd drive is a slave.
in the boot up screen it shows hdc as a maxtor...bla bla bla
it just doesnt see it in fdisk.
have tried restarting but no luck still...
|
Could you give a few more details rather than "bla bla bla?" Are you referring to a Fedora Core 3 boot screen or to your BIOS screen? (I suspect the latter, since FC3 does not normally list disk devices.)
Some suggestions:
First, can FC3 access the DVD drive? (If not, perhaps you have a real hardware [read "IDE controler"] problem.) If it can, create a XP boot floppy (On an XP system, it's one of the format options.), boot your server from that, and see if the drive is available from the DOS prompt. (Again, if not, I'd worry about the controler.) Another check: switch the two IDE cables at the controler, and see what happens. [I think FC3 will still find the boot device, but I'm not sure.]
Second, does your BIOS support S.M.A.R.T., and do you have it enabled for your IDE drives?
Third, if you boot from the Linux rescue CD (or DVD), is the drive visable there.
Fourth, the Linux NTFS drivers (unless you bought a commercial one) should only be used in "read-only" mode, so the "Logical Volume" (partition type 43, I think), is not usually relevant, and certainly not if the device is not yet recognized. In any case, the device should be recognized regardless what the partition type is set to.
Fifth. No, forget it: I was going to suggest looking at "parted," but that's only useful after the device is recognized.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|