LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-22-2019, 02:57 PM   #1
Mr. Macintosh
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2015
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 297

Rep: Reputation: 60
Most Cost-Effective Multi-Drive Storage Solution for SBC Server


I want to set up a server with an ARM-based SBC like the upcoming Odroid N2. Among other things I'd like to have it function as a media server, particularly for large HD video files. Currently, my videos only take up 2 TB, but I'd like to have a good amount of room to expand.


What would be the most cost-effective way to go about this? External hard drives? A multi-bay enclosure? A case like this (https://www.hardkernel.com/shop/clou...4-smokyblue/)? Or would it be alright (in terms of cooling) to go with a multi-bay dock? If a multi-bay enclosure would be best, which one? I don't really want to go spending more than $100-$120 on the enclosure, and I've been having a hard time finding a good one in that price range.
 
Old 03-24-2019, 05:25 AM   #2
fatmac
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Upper Hale, Surrey/Hants Border, UK
Distribution: Mainly Devuan, antiX, & Void, with Tiny Core, Fatdog, & BSD thrown in.
Posts: 5,504

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
To my mind, likely cheapest way would be external disks on a powered USB hub.
 
Old 03-24-2019, 03:28 PM   #3
Mr. Macintosh
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2015
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 297

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 60
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatmac View Post
To my mind, likely cheapest way would be external disks on a powered USB hub.
Okay, cool. My next concern is reliability. I've seen some reviews of some Western Digital Elements external hard drives not lasting too long, though I realize it's possible that a very small number of these drives failed and most of the folks who wrote reviews are ones who received the faulty units.



For a NAS, would an external drive be particularly reliable, considering that they seem to usually contain drives that are more intended for traditional desktop use (i.e. WD Blue) as opposed to possibly being frequently accessed in a NAS (i.e. frequently spinning up & down)? Or would you say that for a small number of users (i.e. 1-4), it doesn't really matter?
 
Old 03-25-2019, 03:05 PM   #4
Germany_chris
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: NOVA
Distribution: Debian 12
Posts: 1,071

Rep: Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497
I'd probably run 3 4tb WD Reds in RAID 5 through USB 3 enclosure
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is effective user ID and effective group Id Anoop Madhusoodhanan P Linux - Kernel 1 01-11-2010 03:29 PM
Cost-effective way to deal with the BSOD..... Megamieuwsel General 2 02-28-2004 06:54 PM
Linux Drivers - Cost Effective yet? Skyline General 3 06-30-2003 10:37 AM
Most efficient cost effective way??? nor General 3 06-26-2003 11:39 AM
cost effective box to run Linux MacGuy Linux - Newbie 5 05-25-2001 02:38 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration