GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Well, actually, that is kind of true. Many of the Athlons use the same (or a similar) processor core, with increased clock speed and better heat dissapation being the main difference between lower/higher clock speeds. In the end, I think your pretty safe picking any of the Athlon chips, as long as it meets your needs speed wise.
Distribution: Slackware, (Non-Linux: Solaris 7,8,9; OSX; BeOS)
It's not, exactly, a rip-off (in that everyone does it). There is a price-"speed" curve, and at some point that curve turns up so things are much more expensive per "speed unit". I usually buy a processor that is on the curve just before it turns up. The use of the same core is nothing new either. Many processors fail the tests for higher clock speeds but work fine at lower ones, so they fall into the lower clock speed bin. AMD was, in the past-not now, really notorious with overclockers because their chips weren't very good at overclocking. That's because AMD used a chip's highest stable speed as its clock speed when it was sold -- doesn't overclock well when you do that. They've overcome that liability and are the best x86 CPU manufacturer out there. (IMHO)