LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 06-25-2003, 07:27 PM   #1
nor
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: S. CA
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
Most efficient cost effective way???


I am purchasing a new computer and am trying to get the most of the chip by upgrading the hardware.

I'm looking at an Atholoon XP w/ high L1 and L2 cache. But, I've heard you have to choose the right model b/c some of them are a rip off for the price increase and higher clock speed.

Thanks.
 
Old 06-26-2003, 07:01 AM   #2
slightcrazed
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Lisbon Falls, Maine
Distribution: RH 8.0, 9.0, FC2 - 4, Slack 9.0 - 10.2, Knoppix 3.4 - 4.0, LFS,
Posts: 789

Rep: Reputation: 30
Well, actually, that is kind of true. Many of the Athlons use the same (or a similar) processor core, with increased clock speed and better heat dissapation being the main difference between lower/higher clock speeds. In the end, I think your pretty safe picking any of the Athlon chips, as long as it meets your needs speed wise.

slight
 
Old 06-26-2003, 09:53 AM   #3
moses
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Arizona, US, Earth
Distribution: Slackware, (Non-Linux: Solaris 7,8,9; OSX; BeOS)
Posts: 1,152

Rep: Reputation: 46
It's not, exactly, a rip-off (in that everyone does it). There is a price-"speed" curve, and at some point that curve turns up so things are much more expensive per "speed unit". I usually buy a processor that is on the curve just before it turns up. The use of the same core is nothing new either. Many processors fail the tests for higher clock speeds but work fine at lower ones, so they fall into the lower clock speed bin. AMD was, in the past-not now, really notorious with overclockers because their chips weren't very good at overclocking. That's because AMD used a chip's highest stable speed as its clock speed when it was sold -- doesn't overclock well when you do that. They've overcome that liability and are the best x86 CPU manufacturer out there. (IMHO)
 
Old 06-26-2003, 11:39 AM   #4
nor
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: S. CA
Posts: 2

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Okay, if you suggest buying one right before the curve, would an Atholon XP 1700 w/ L1 128K and L2 256K cache be on the curve you mentioned? Especially at $68.43?
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How effective is a proxy? trj266 Linux - Security 3 10-26-2005 02:41 PM
how is an XLock effective? fibbi Linux - Software 3 10-13-2004 08:53 AM
Cost-effective way to deal with the BSOD..... Megamieuwsel General 2 02-28-2004 06:54 PM
Linux Drivers - Cost Effective yet? Skyline General 3 06-30-2003 10:37 AM
cost effective box to run Linux MacGuy Linux - Newbie 5 05-25-2001 02:38 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration