LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-16-2007, 09:26 PM   #1
elemings
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 7

Rep: Reputation: 0
Can't mount a disk. Need some ideas.


I just upgraded to Fedora 7. I have two hard disks in my machine. Here's what I get from 'fdisk -l':

Disk /dev/sda: 27.3 GB, 27373731840 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3328 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 13 104391 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 14 3328 26627737+ 8e Linux LVM

Disk /dev/sdb: 74.3 GB, 74355769344 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 9039 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 * 1 13 104391 83 Linux
/dev/sdb2 14 9039 72501345 8e Linux LVM


My previous OS is installed on the larger disk so when I went to upgrade, I just unplugged it and installed Fedora 7 on the smaller disk.

After installation, I plugged the disk back in and rebooted but now when I try to mount the disk with 'mount /dev/sdb2 /mnt', I get a 'mount: /dev/sdb2 already mounted or /mnt busy' error. It's not mounted or busy as far as I can tell.

I noticed others had problems with dm-mod/dm-mirror interferring so I tried uncommenting those lines from modules.dep but that didn't work. Also looked for locks in 'lsof' but nothing.

Could use some ideas.

Thanks,
Eric.
 
Old 06-16-2007, 09:38 PM   #2
syg00
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 21,140

Rep: Reputation: 4123Reputation: 4123Reputation: 4123Reputation: 4123Reputation: 4123Reputation: 4123Reputation: 4123Reputation: 4123Reputation: 4123Reputation: 4123Reputation: 4123
If you've got two Fedora systems installed, they probably have the same named VGs and LVs. Especially if the installer couldn't see the other disk - presumably would use the default names.
 
Old 06-16-2007, 09:39 PM   #3
elemings
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 7

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
I think I have some idea of what happened at least. At some point, LVM2 could not see the larger disk so it just overwrote the previous logical volume. I get the following from 'lvscan':

WARNING: Duplicate VG name VolGroup00: Existing 8u2SkJ-28V0-iXPD-BSt3-o6KD-y6dx-rjLCVw (created here) takes precedence over 2NwURw-UN8n-bk21-sJqw-W8HZ-6w3A-HOXGFY
 
Old 06-16-2007, 09:54 PM   #4
jschiwal
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Fargo, ND
Distribution: SuSE AMD64
Posts: 15,733

Rep: Reputation: 682Reputation: 682Reputation: 682Reputation: 682Reputation: 682Reputation: 682
Why would you unplug the disk? Your drive assignments for one of the disk will be wrong in menu.lst and /etc/fstab. You will need to correct your /boot/grub/menu.lst and fstab files correcting the drive assignments. You might as well combine the entries from the other installs menu.lst so that both are on the same menu. Just use grub one of the first disks so that you don't get into a dueling MBR situation. Only update grub for one distro.

If there is a conflict between what grub sees as (hd0,0) when booting and what it sees as (hd0,0) after Linux is running, then edit the /boot/grub/device.map file to fix it.
Code:
(hd1)   /dev/sda
(hd0)   /dev/hda
It is simply a text file. The problem is if the root partition is (hd0) but when you boot the system is saying that hd0 is /dev/sda. Then it would try to boot from the wrong disk.

Another possibility is if there is drive information in an LVM or raid superblock and the kernel procedes to assemble the array. Then later, your /etc/fstab information is wrong and it tries to mount /dev/hdb2 instead of /dev/hda2.
 
Old 06-16-2007, 10:16 PM   #5
elemings
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 7

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by jschiwal
Why would you unplug the disk?
So that nothing bad can possibly happen to it during system upgrade.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jschiwal
Your drive assignments for one of the disk will be wrong in menu.lst and /etc/fstab.
Here's my current /etc/fstab:

Code:
/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 /                       ext3    defaults        1 1
LABEL=/boot             /boot                   ext3    defaults        1 2
tmpfs                   /dev/shm                tmpfs   defaults        0 0
devpts                  /dev/pts                devpts  gid=5,mode=620  0 0
sysfs                   /sys                    sysfs   defaults        0 0
proc                    /proc                   proc    defaults        0 0
/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01 swap                    swap    defaults        0 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by jschiwal
You will need to correct your /boot/grub/menu.lst and fstab files correcting the drive assignments.
Here's my /boot/grub/menu.lst file:

Code:
# grub.conf generated by anaconda
#
# Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
# NOTICE:  You have a /boot partition.  This means that
#          all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg.
#          root (hd0,0)
#          kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
#          initrd /initrd-version.img
#boot=/dev/sda
default=0
timeout=5
splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
hiddenmenu
title Fedora (2.6.21-1.3228.fc7)
        root (hd0,0)
        kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 rhgb quiet
        initrd /initrd-2.6.21-1.3228.fc7.img
title Fedora (2.6.21-1.3194.fc7)
        root (hd0,0)
        kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 rhgb quiet
        initrd /initrd-2.6.21-1.3194.fc7.img
Quote:
Originally Posted by jschiwal
You might as well combine the entries from the other installs menu.lst so that both are on the same menu. Just use grub one of the first disks so that you don't get into a dueling MBR situation. Only update grub for one distro.

If there is a conflict between what grub sees as (hd0,0) when booting and what it sees as (hd0,0) after Linux is running, then edit the /boot/grub/device.map file to fix it.
Code:
(hd1)   /dev/sda
(hd0)   /dev/hda
It is simply a text file. The problem is if the root partition is (hd0) but when you boot the system is saying that hd0 is /dev/sda. Then it would try to boot from the wrong disk.

Another possibility is if there is drive information in an LVM or raid superblock and the kernel procedes to assemble the array. Then later, your /etc/fstab information is wrong and it tries to mount /dev/hdb2 instead of /dev/hda2.
I think that is the case. I can still mount the other logical volumes on the larger disk just not the root partition.

Code:
# ls -al /dev/VolGroup00
total 0
drwx------  2 root root  120 2007-06-16 22:11 .
drwxr-xr-x 12 root root 4440 2007-06-16 22:12 ..
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root   31 2007-06-16 22:11 LogVol00 -> /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root   31 2007-06-16 22:11 LogVol01 -> /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol01
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root   31 2007-06-16 22:11 LogVol02 -> /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol02
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root   31 2007-06-16 22:11 LogVol03 -> /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol03
When I try to mount LogVol00, I just get the root partition of the smaller disk. Any LVM2 experts out there? :P
 
Old 06-16-2007, 10:45 PM   #6
syg00
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 21,140

Rep: Reputation: 4123Reputation: 4123Reputation: 4123Reputation: 4123Reputation: 4123Reputation: 4123Reputation: 4123Reputation: 4123Reputation: 4123Reputation: 4123Reputation: 4123
Personally I would leave them as separate systems, and change the boot disk via the BIOS. Then use a (new) shared partition to copy/move share data to. If you really need to get at the data, you'll probably have to rename LVs (at least) - maybe even the VGs as well.
Ugh.
Then, of course, there'll be issues with the systems that owned that data originally.
Double ugh.

There's a lvm guide at tldp.org - start reading there.

Caveat: I don't use LVM (this sort of thing is one of the reasons why), so this is just me theorizing.
 
Old 06-16-2007, 10:49 PM   #7
elemings
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 7

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by syg00
If you've got two Fedora systems installed, they probably have the same named VGs and LVs. Especially if the installer couldn't see the other disk - presumably would use the default names.
I see that:

Code:
# vgdisplay
  WARNING: Duplicate VG name VolGroup00: Existing 8u2SkJ-28V0-iXPD-BSt3-o6KD-y6dx-rjLCVw (created here) takes precedence over 2NwURw-UN8n-bk21-sJqw-W8HZ-6w3A-HOXGFY
  --- Volume group ---
  VG Name               VolGroup00
  System ID             
  Format                lvm2
  Metadata Areas        1
  Metadata Sequence No  23
  VG Access             read/write
  VG Status             resizable
  MAX LV                0
  Cur LV                4
  Open LV               2
  Max PV                0
  Cur PV                1
  Act PV                1
  VG Size               69.12 GB
  PE Size               32.00 MB
  Total PE              2212
  Alloc PE / Size       2211 / 69.09 GB
  Free  PE / Size       1 / 32.00 MB
  VG UUID               2NwURw-UN8n-bk21-sJqw-W8HZ-6w3A-HOXGFY
   
  --- Volume group ---
  VG Name               VolGroup00
  System ID             
  Format                lvm2
  Metadata Areas        1
  Metadata Sequence No  3
  VG Access             read/write
  VG Status             resizable
  MAX LV                0
  Cur LV                2
  Open LV               2
  Max PV                0
  Cur PV                1
  Act PV                1
  VG Size               25.38 GB
  PE Size               32.00 MB
  Total PE              812
  Alloc PE / Size       811 / 25.34 GB
  Free  PE / Size       1 / 32.00 MB
  VG UUID               8u2SkJ-28V0-iXPD-BSt3-o6KD-y6dx-rjLCVw
Would 'vgrename' work?
 
Old 06-17-2007, 05:31 PM   #8
jschiwal
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Fargo, ND
Distribution: SuSE AMD64
Posts: 15,733

Rep: Reputation: 682Reputation: 682Reputation: 682Reputation: 682Reputation: 682Reputation: 682
Is this menu.lst from the FC7 you installed on the second disk?
Code:
# grub.conf generated by anaconda
#
# Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
# NOTICE:  You have a /boot partition.  This means that
#          all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg.
#          root (hd0,0)
#          kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
#          initrd /initrd-version.img
#boot=/dev/sda
default=0
timeout=5
splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
hiddenmenu
title Fedora (2.6.21-1.3228.fc7)
        root (hd0,0)
        kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 rhgb quiet
        initrd /initrd-2.6.21-1.3228.fc7.img
title Fedora (2.6.21-1.3194.fc7)
        root (hd0,0)
        kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 rhgb quiet
        initrd /initrd-2.6.21-1.3194.fc7.img
The root disk indicated is (hd0,0) which I think is /dev/sda1 instead of /dev/sdb1 which is the one you installed FC7 on. However check the device.map file to make sure that (hd0,0) is /dev/sda1. When you installed it with the first disk out, (hd1,0) became (hd0,0). Now with it in again, it is (hd1,0) again.
 
Old 06-17-2007, 09:51 PM   #9
elemings
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 7

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by jschiwal
The root disk indicated is (hd0,0) which I think is /dev/sda1 instead of /dev/sdb1 which is the one you installed FC7 on. However check the device.map file to make sure that (hd0,0) is /dev/sda1. When you installed it with the first disk out, (hd1,0) became (hd0,0). Now with it in again, it is (hd1,0) again.
Not sure what that has to do with my problem. I just need to be able to mount the root volume on the disk. The problem is that both root volumes have the same name and, currently, LVM2 is not capable of resolving the problem.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Ten ideas about Ideas LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 11-05-2006 08:21 AM
Scalable, cheap disk storage? (Hypothetical, interested in ideas) tormentum Linux - General 4 06-09-2006 02:34 AM
How to mount floppy disk? iclinux Linux - Newbie 7 04-25-2005 02:11 PM
How to mount a new disk VDC AIX 3 10-25-2004 12:26 PM
how do I mount a disk?? sgroy45 Linux - General 3 11-25-2002 05:11 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration