Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux? |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
01-24-2005, 02:28 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Germany / Hannover
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 24
Rep:
|
Building a low-budget system - Intel or AMD?
Hi all,
I'm screwing together a low-bugdet system and wondering whether to buy an AMD or Intel CPU. My options would be
Intel Celeron D 320 (2,4 GHz)
on a VIA PT880-chipset mainboard ( http://www.asrock.com/product/product_p4v88.htm)
or
AMD Sempron 2400+
on VIA KT880-chipset ( http://www.asrock.com/product/product_k7upgrade880.htm)
The mainboards cost each about 35 € and both offer DualDDR. Since many benchmarks in the web force their tests on 3D-performace they don't deliver me the info I need to decide which one to choose for linux - stability and compatibility would speek for Intel I guess. And the Intel-platform can be upgraded up to Pentium 3,2GHz (Sock. 478) - which I suppose performs better than anything on Socket A - Am I right?
Would be great if you post here what speaks for/against the one/other decision.
|
|
|
01-24-2005, 03:05 PM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: ESU, Student Teaching 5th Grade
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 118
Rep:
|
The sempron is the better buy of the two especially in terms of Linux support. Though I highly recommend non low end cpu/mobo choices. The consumer level amd64 boxes are not that much more expensive. I just got a decent mobo/proc/gpu/ram for $300 for a new workstation I'm building.
|
|
|
01-24-2005, 03:08 PM
|
#3
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Germany / Hannover
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 24
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Just found this thread which covers the same quiestion:
Which Processor on Linux- AMD or Intel?
|
|
|
01-24-2005, 03:13 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Smiths Falls Ontario (near ottawa [our capital])
Distribution: slackware 9.1, redhat 9.0, PHLAK, SuSE 9.0Pro windows XP (HEAVILY MODIFIED)
Posts: 111
Rep:
|
AMD is FAR more stable than any intel ever
i have a 2100+ over clocked and it has never froze, ever
even playing games like doom3
my freind has a dual p4 3.2ghz
and his freezes and clocse apps at random all the time
intel is far less atable than amd
|
|
|
01-24-2005, 03:57 PM
|
#5
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Germany / Hannover
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 24
Original Poster
Rep:
|
About AMD 64-Bit:
Isn't it too early to swich, I mean many things still need to be finished to reach full 64Bit performence in linux. How far is it? Mplayer for example, would it work on a 64 Bit CPU?
About the switching itself - I wanted just to plug my old harddrive with my current system on it and boot - maybe build a new kernel.
But with amd64 I would have to recompile every application - or reinstall linux with a 64Bit-distro.
I'm still openminded about 64bit,
either getting amd64 - but than it would be the latest socket and a gigabyte mainboard - which will be more costy
or
waiting another year or so before going amd64 and buying a low-budget system
Last edited by bailmann; 01-24-2005 at 04:03 PM.
|
|
|
01-24-2005, 04:06 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: ESU, Student Teaching 5th Grade
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 118
Rep:
|
64 bit procs support running 32 bit binaries at full speed. The Windows crowd does it with their entire operating system.
|
|
|
01-28-2005, 01:11 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: USA-Los Angeles, California
Distribution: Fedora 15
Posts: 119
Rep:
|
I'm also thinking of getting an AMD64 Laptop. I understand the 64 can run 32 stuff. What I'm not sure of is if I use Fedora 3 (64bit) can I use basically any program that works on the 32 Fedora without changes if they don't have a 64 version out yet. I know there may be some exceptions, but will most of the 32 bit stuff, say 90% work off the shelf. I don't want to get in over my head, with modifications to make 32 stuff work on the AMD64 chip.
Last edited by tktim; 01-28-2005 at 01:12 PM.
|
|
|
01-29-2005, 07:25 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: ESU, Student Teaching 5th Grade
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 118
Rep:
|
You can run 32 bit programs fine in a 64 bit OS.
|
|
|
01-30-2005, 03:35 PM
|
#9
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: USA-Los Angeles, California
Distribution: Fedora 15
Posts: 119
Rep:
|
Thanks, sounds great. 32 O.K. on 64.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|