LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-01-2006, 05:11 PM   #16
ingvildr
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: England, South East
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 358

Rep: Reputation: 30

i have never had any problems with ati, oh except one, waiting months on end for x1600 support but apart from that the only problem with their linux package is the lack of a decent control center, i mean the one that have now is utter rubbish, i would love to see a port of catalyst to gtk2
 
Old 07-01-2006, 05:13 PM   #17
J.W.
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Boise, ID
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 6,642

Rep: Reputation: 87
Thermodynamic - Please post back with your findings once you've had a chance to play with the ATI card. I'd definitely be interested in what your experiences are with respect to the current (eg, mid-2006) state of ATI's Linux support. Thanks
 
Old 07-01-2006, 05:17 PM   #18
J_K9
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Distribution: Slackware 11, Ubuntu 6.06 LTS
Posts: 700

Rep: Reputation: 30
NVidia for the win! NVidia has put much more effort into producing a good Linux driver than ATi has, and although the situation is getting slightly better on ATi's side, the ball is in NVidia's court when it comes to 3d accelerated graphics support and Linux.

I have never had a GUI-related problem with Linux on computers with NVidia GPUs. However, I usually have to do at least some minor tweaking to get even the most newbie-friendly distros to work with my ATi card properly (an X700XL) - even Ubuntu.

I'd say that NVidia wins this by quite a long way at the moment.. Here's to hoping that ATi will produce as good Linux drivers as NVidia in the future

Cheers,

-jk
 
Old 07-01-2006, 11:43 PM   #19
IBall
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, Various using VMWare
Posts: 2,088

Rep: Reputation: 62
I do not play games - so I don't really know which one has better hardware. Some gamers swear by ATI and others by Nvidia, so it strikes me that there will actually be very little difference.

As for installing the drivers, some distros such as Fedora and Ubuntu have packages available for install using yum or apt-get respectively. This makes it painless to install the drivers for both ATI and Nvidia - just a simple "yum install" or "apt-get install" restart X and your done.

--Ian
 
Old 07-02-2006, 03:48 AM   #20
J_K9
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Distribution: Slackware 11, Ubuntu 6.06 LTS
Posts: 700

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBall
I do not play games - so I don't really know which one has better hardware. Some gamers swear by ATI and others by Nvidia, so it strikes me that there will actually be very little difference.
At the moment, ATi seems to have the upper hand with their X1900XTX - but that could change soon. I swear by NVidia not because they have better hardware, but because they produce excellent GPUs for a pretty good price (most of the time), and their Linux driver is more advanced. My NVidia 7900GT does well perfectly rendering some of the toughest games (on Windows), so even though it may not be the best card out there, it is very good and does its job better than I need it to.
Quote:
As for installing the drivers, some distros such as Fedora and Ubuntu have packages available for install using yum or apt-get respectively. This makes it painless to install the drivers for both ATI and Nvidia - just a simple "yum install" or "apt-get install" restart X and your done.
Yes, but it isn't always that easy. Some ATi cards can be a real pain to set up, whether your distro provides a native package for the driver or not. NVidia's driver tends to be much easier to set up, and will usually require less tweaking later on (or none at all) in comparison to the ATi one. But that's just my take on the experience with both - what you think of both drivers or manufacturers is your opinion, and I'm not going to try to change it
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
card 1 = nvidia( with nvidia module), card 2 = ati (pci) darkhatter Linux - Hardware 3 05-22-2006 04:06 PM
from ATI to NVIDIA -> no X true_atlantis SUSE / openSUSE 3 01-06-2006 05:18 PM
Nvidia or ATi ? eggmanx Linux - Newbie 7 01-01-2006 06:57 AM
Ati driver a bit unstable but no different than nvidia..ati benchmark inside. spade Slackware 1 10-06-2004 12:13 AM
nvidia vs Ati mindcry Linux - Hardware 1 11-28-2003 09:06 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration