LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-29-2011, 04:20 AM   #1
layr
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Estonia
Distribution: Debian testing
Posts: 38

Rep: Reputation: 0
Any recommendation for lower energy consuming distro?


I am looking for lowest power consuming distro - even ubuntu new releases are going downhill. Yet it's a bit confusing - isn't the energy consumption dependant solely on the kernel not the actual distro?
Is there any new recommendations concerning distros with the best power consumption? Is there even one better than win7?
For instance, what about damnsmalllinux?

Last edited by colucix; 10-29-2011 at 07:48 AM.
 
Old 10-29-2011, 04:53 AM   #2
elliott678
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: North Carolina
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 977

Rep: Reputation: 74
Quote:
Originally Posted by layr View Post
For instance, what about damnsmalllinux?
I don't think DSL would be a good choice, it uses a very old kernel and probably doesn't support many of the things needed to conserve power on a modern system.

I use Arch on my EeePC 901 with kernel-netbook from AUR that is supposed to have many improvements for power consumption over the stock kernel.

I took advantage of the "Super Hybrid Engine" that Asus has and can underclock and overclock the processor as I need, support for this is in all recent kernels. It goes beyond Speedstep, which I also have enabled, it is actually changing the FSB and in the powersave mode it drops nearly a watt.

I also use PHC to undervolt the processor, which gives me extra battery life under load, it doesn't help at idle since this particular system won't allow undervolting on the lower levels of Speedstep. This is about another watt in savings when at full load.

Sometimes factory fan configurations aren't the most efficient either, so overriding the BIOS can get you some savings. I run it as little as possible when on battery. Since I undervolted it, the temperatures have been staying lower anyway and most of the time the fan stays off, when it comes on it rarely goes above 20% speed.

Unfortunately there isn't really any power saving in the drivers for my Atheros wireless card at the moment. I've considered swapping for an Intel one, but haven't gotten around to it. I remember some decent savings on my Intel based Acer when enabling the power saving modes.

I also cut power to the camera, card reader and bluetooth when I am not using them.

In total, I've saved 4 watts at idle and 6 watts under load, which is huge on a system that runs under 20 watts under load. Unfortunately my battery is showing its age and only has 78% capacity now, so I'm getting the same 5 hours that this system got when it was new without tweaking.

Of course, on top of all of that, I'm running fairly light software to keep CPU and disk activity to a minimum.

Keep in mind that not all of these are possible on every system, but it should give you an idea of what is possible in Linux.

Last edited by elliott678; 10-29-2011 at 04:57 AM.
 
Old 10-29-2011, 08:59 AM   #3
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 13,925
Blog Entries: 44

Rep: Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159Reputation: 3159
Hi,
Quote:
Originally Posted by layr View Post
I am looking for lowest power consuming distro - even ubuntu new releases are going downhill. Yet it's a bit confusing - isn't the energy consumption dependant solely on the kernel not the actual distro?
Is there any new recommendations concerning distros with the best power consumption? Is there even one better than win7?
For instance, what about damnsmalllinux?
Basically, uniform control of power will be dictated by the kernel interfaces be setup to the level(s) desired. Modern Linux kernels do allow users to setup control with ease. It is a Gnu/Linux that gets in the way, good example is Ubuntu. Any time you have interfaces between the user and kernel then the user(s) will be limited because of inherent differences between API/UI by the author with said system.

For myself, I do prefer to not have anything between kernel and control of systems. One of the reasons to use Slackware, minimum to no intervention therefore tweaks can be performed without worry or inhibitions.

For non-specific Gnu/Linux reference then;

Quote:
excerpt from Devices section of SlackwareŽ-Links;

LessWatts.org <-'LessWatts is about creating a community around saving power on Linux, bringing developers, users, and sysadmins together to share software, optimizations, and tips & tricks.'
HTH!
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Less power consuming distro cheperico Linux - Newbie 18 06-30-2011 04:32 PM
High energy consuming finaccio Linux - Laptop and Netbook 5 12-14-2010 10:17 PM
Distro Uses Less Energy? Delpheno Linux - Hardware 4 06-15-2006 12:02 PM
LXer: Solutions for the Energy Crises -- Part 1: Alternate Energy and Conservation LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-03-2006 10:16 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:47 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration