any recommendable high performance servers or equipment?
Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
any recommendable high performance servers or equipment?
Hello, all.
We buy lots of servers for internet service.
But, as you know the cost is higher and higher,
so I would like to find other good solution or equipment to decrease the number of servers.
Is there any good solutions or equipments recommendable that I can decrease the number of servers?
I think this question is too general and lacking in specifics to be able to say much:
Obviously, you should consider optimising the performance of what you've got - you should be able to guess why I haven't gone on to say exactly how to do that
If you have any idea of what the bottlenecks are, then eliminating the bottlenecks are makes sense. there is relly not much point in paying more to get a faster disk subsystem if your problem is networking
The more obvious thing of trying to get the most MIPS for your money is probably nice, but, as that might not be your problem, who knows whether it helps much?
Depending on the workload using virtual machines can be used.
Using an embedded version of Linux, an ARM chip, and a SSD can decrease the cost, decrease electricity consumption, and provide high performance. IMHO, it is all about efficiency.
Setting up a server to also have the lowest latency possible is better than high throughput. Although, high throughput does compensate for TCP/IP overhead when multiple connections are needed. Sure ethernet bonding can be used, but the bus can only transfer one thing at a time. Finding and buying a 10 gigabit NIC that fits in a PCIe or PCI-X slot and it is controller based is better than ethernet bonding.
Rewriting PHP, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and Apache to run on stream processors like nVidia GeForce8 or higher can provide very, very high performance.
I think buying multiple low performance servers is cheaper than buying one big high performance server.
MIPS is the worst thing that relates to performance. Linux calls this bogomips. Bogo means to be absurd, insane, ridiculous straight from urbandictionary.com.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.