LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-27-2018, 10:05 PM   #1
rnturn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Illinois (SW Chicago 'burbs)
Distribution: openSUSE, Raspbian, Slackware. Previous: MacOS, Red Hat, Coherent, Consensys SVR4.2, Tru64, Solaris
Posts: 2,803

Rep: Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550
Timestamps in "messages" are "off"


I experienced a desktop crash a few days ago--stepped away for dinner and I found that X had crashed while I was away leaving me at a console prompt--and while I was poring over the messages file looking for clues why, I ran across some time stamp "oddness" marked w/ arrows in the snippet below:

Code:
   Jan 25 20:57:41 systemname PackageKit: daemon start
   Jan 25 20:57:40 systemname kernel: snd_hda_intel 0000:00:1b.0: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj.
   Jan 25 20:57:53 systemname polkitd[6751]: Registered Authentication Agent for unix-session:1 (system bus name :1.33 [/usr/lib64/kde4/libexec/polkit-kde-authentication-agent-1], object path /org/kde/PolicyKit1/AuthenticationAgent, locale en_US.UTF-8)
-> Jan 26 02:57:54 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Successfully called chroot.
-> Jan 26 02:57:54 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Successfully dropped privileges.
-> Jan 26 02:57:54 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Successfully limited resources.
-> Jan 26 02:57:54 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Running.
-> Jan 26 02:57:54 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Watchdog thread running.
-> Jan 26 02:57:54 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Canary thread running.
-> Jan 26 02:57:54 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Successfully made thread 7125 of process 7125 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by 'your-name-here' high priority at nice level -11.
-> Jan 26 02:57:54 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Supervising 1 threads of 1 processes of 1 users.
   Jan 25 20:57:56 systemname hp-systray: hp-systray[6939]: error: option -s not recognized
-> Jan 26 02:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Supervising 1 threads of 1 processes of 1 users.
-> Jan 26 02:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Successfully made thread 7151 of process 7125 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by 'your-name-here' RT at priority 5.
-> Jan 26 02:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Supervising 2 threads of 1 processes of 1 users.
   Jan 25 20:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon: Last message 'Supervising 2 thread' repeated 1 times, suppressed by syslog-ng on systemname
-> Jan 26 02:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Successfully made thread 7152 of process 7125 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by 'your-name-here' RT at priority 9.
-> Jan 26 02:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Supervising 3 threads of 1 processes of 1 users.
   Jan 25 20:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon: Last message 'Supervising 3 thread' repeated 1 times, suppressed by syslog-ng on systemname
-> Jan 26 02:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Successfully made thread 7155 of process 7125 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by 'your-name-here' RT at priority 9.
-> Jan 26 02:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Supervising 4 threads of 1 processes of 1 users.
   Jan 25 20:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon: Last message 'Supervising 4 thread' repeated 1 times, suppressed by syslog-ng on systemname
-> Jan 26 02:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Successfully made thread 7154 of process 7125 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by 'your-name-here' RT at priority 5.
-> Jan 26 02:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Supervising 5 threads of 1 processes of 1 users.
   Jan 25 20:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon: Last message 'Supervising 5 thread' repeated 1 times, suppressed by syslog-ng on systemname
-> Jan 26 02:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Successfully made thread 7153 of process 7125 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by 'your-name-here' RT at priority 9.
-> Jan 26 02:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Successfully made thread 7155 of process 7125 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by 'your-name-here' RT at priority 9.
-> Jan 26 02:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Supervising 4 threads of 1 processes of 1 users.
   Jan 25 20:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon: Last message 'Supervising 4 thread' repeated 1 times, suppressed by syslog-ng on systemname
-> Jan 26 02:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Successfully made thread 7154 of process 7125 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by 'your-name-here' RT at priority 5.
-> Jan 26 02:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Supervising 5 threads of 1 processes of 1 users.
   Jan 25 20:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon: Last message 'Supervising 5 thread' repeated 1 times, suppressed by syslog-ng on systemname
-> Jan 26 02:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Successfully made thread 7153 of process 7125 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by 'your-name-here' RT at priority 9.
-> Jan 26 02:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Supervising 6 threads of 1 processes of 1 users.
   Jan 25 20:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon: Last message 'Supervising 6 thread' repeated 1 times, suppressed by syslog-ng on systemname
-> Jan 26 02:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Successfully made thread 7157 of process 7125 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by 'your-name-here' RT at priority 5.
-> Jan 26 02:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Supervising 7 threads of 1 processes of 1 users.
   Jan 25 20:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon: Last message 'Supervising 7 thread' repeated 1 times, suppressed by syslog-ng on systemname
-> Jan 26 02:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Successfully made thread 7158 of process 7125 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by 'your-name-here' RT at priority 9.
-> Jan 26 02:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Supervising 8 threads of 1 processes of 1 users.
   Jan 25 20:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon: Last message 'Supervising 8 thread' repeated 1 times, suppressed by syslog-ng on systemname
-> Jan 26 02:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Successfully made thread 7156 of process 7125 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by 'your-name-here' RT at priority 9.
-> Jan 26 02:57:57 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Supervising 9 threads of 1 processes of 1 users.
   Jan 25 20:58:01 systemname PackageKit: get-updates transaction /1_dddbdeba from uid 1000 finished with success after 8093ms
-> Jan 26 02:58:01 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Supervising 9 threads of 1 processes of 1 users.
-> Jan 26 02:58:01 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Successfully made thread 7212 of process 7125 (/usr/bin/pulseaudio) owned by 'your-name-here' RT at priority 6.
-> Jan 26 02:58:01 systemname rtkit-daemon[7126]: Supervising 10 threads of 1 processes of 1 users.
   Jan 25 20:58:01 systemname PackageKit: get-distro-upgrades transaction /2_ebeabdba from uid 1000 finished with success after 514ms
I have never seen this before.

Q: Is it normal for some process on the system--in this case, "rtkit-daemon"--to be unaware of the time zone and have the timestamp off by hours? Note that it's not consistently off. After the desktop crash, the normal filesystem checks after a reboot showed that the "/home" filesystem was corrupted. Running "e2fsck" placed a ton of entries in "lost+found"--thank goodness for daily backups. I found nothing in the messages file that seemed to be related to something mucking up the filesystem (which was the reason I was looking at the log in the first place.)

Background: OpenSUSE 13.2 (upgrading to Leap "real soon now"). Multiple Chrome windows were open at the time and a Perl script was beavering away and inserting info into a remote PostgreSQL database just before or at the time of the desktop crash. Jack was running but no clients were doing anything sound-related at the time. Reply with questions about what else was running at the time and I'll try and recall (no guarantees; memories fading fast).

Has anyone seen this before?

Any theories are welcome---heck, even wild-eyed guesses, too, for that matter. This chunk of log file's got me stumped.

TIA...

--
Rick
 
Old 01-28-2018, 07:52 AM   #2
RockDoctor
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Minnesota, US
Distribution: Fedora, Ubuntu, Manjaro
Posts: 1,791

Rep: Reputation: 427Reputation: 427Reputation: 427Reputation: 427Reputation: 427
Haven't seen it before, but it looks like UTC (Jan 26 02:57:57) vs. CST (Jan 25 20:57:57).
 
Old 01-28-2018, 10:07 AM   #3
norobro
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 792

Rep: Reputation: 331Reputation: 331Reputation: 331Reputation: 331
Old bug that is marked "duplicate" but might point you in the right direction: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689655

I LOL'ed at post #7.
 
Old 01-28-2018, 12:08 PM   #4
rnturn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Illinois (SW Chicago 'burbs)
Distribution: openSUSE, Raspbian, Slackware. Previous: MacOS, Red Hat, Coherent, Consensys SVR4.2, Tru64, Solaris
Posts: 2,803

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550
Quote:
Originally Posted by norobro View Post
Old bug that is marked "duplicate" but might point you in the right direction: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689655

I LOL'ed at post #7.
I just did, too.

(Thanks for that link, BTW.)

Sounds like the vaunted systemd doesn't know the correct order to be starting processes, doesn't it?

I'll mark this thread as solved even though I have no idea how to fix this and it doesn't seem like the systemd folks have much interest in fixing the real problem. Not shiny enough, I guess.

I'll see what I get after my Leap (of Faith) upgrade is complete.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] X: "loading extension glx" "no screens found" "fatal server error" (w/ nvidia driver) Geremia Slackware 7 12-29-2014 11:00 AM
[SOLVED] "net rpc" "failed to connect to ipc$ share on" or "unable to find a suitable server" larieu Linux - General 0 11-09-2014 12:45 AM
"gethostby*.getanswer: asked for "", got "." on messages file wwipro Linux - Server 0 08-06-2013 09:45 PM
"irq timeout" and "failed opcode was: unknown" dmesg messages kenneho Linux - Server 0 06-17-2009 02:35 AM
Boot messages not the same as "dmesg" or "/var/log/messages"? massai Linux - General 5 03-10-2004 12:18 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration