[SOLVED] system monitoring tools takes %100 resource
Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I am using i-5 8 core processor and when I am using Centos 6.4 System Montitoring tools, the CPU-1 goes to 100. This will slow down the other process such as the mouse movement.
Is this a normal behaviour? Is this going to effect any process running on the other cup cores?
I used top command to minitor the CPU resource. Problem I have is that any x-window menue uses lots of resource. For example if I take the firefox and move it around the monitor, the xorg cup usage goes to 100.
What system monitor tools? What is using the CPU? Have you tried top?
Also - there are no 8 core i5 processors. Maybe you mean a quad core with hyperthreading?
This is what I got from the following command. Does it mean that i have a 8 core processor?
[root@rpcxft ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep -i 'core id'
core id : 0
core id : 1
core id : 2
core id : 3
core id : 0
core id : 1
core id : 2
core id : 3
No, that means you have a quad core processor. An 8-core processor would have core ids from 0-7, not two copies of 0-3. You could get that output from a dual processor machine running 2 quad core procs, but the i5 can't be used in a dual processor machine, so that's impossible if you really have an i5. If you check the physical id from cpuinfo you'll see they're all the same, which means it's a single proc quad core machine with hyperthreading. You could also just google the model number from cpuinfo and it would tell you the same thing - 4 cores with 8 threads.
Last edited by suicidaleggroll; 08-18-2015 at 02:23 PM.
No, that means you have a quad core processor. An 8-core processor would have core ids from 0-7, not two copies of 0-3. You could get that output from a dual processor machine running 2 quad core procs, but the i5 can't be used in a dual processor machine, so that's impossible if you really have an i5. If you check the physical id from cpuinfo you'll see they're all the same, which means it's a single proc quad core machine with hyperthreading. You could also just google the model number from cpuinfo and it would tell you the same thing - 4 cores with 8 threads.
You were right. the processor is 4 core and 8 threads. Any idea why the Xorg cpu usage is high?
I had a built in graphic card and I after I used an external one, the Xorg usage dropped to 30%.
Thanks
So Xorg was what was using the CPU so much? And using an external graphics card helped? It sounds like the issue was just a lack of hardware acceleration. Can you confirm or deny this?
Sorry if I sound like I'm badgering, I just want to make sure that future readers of this thread have some idea of what's going on. LQ is pretty high on Google's rankings, and I've come across several threads where the OP just said "Oh, I fixed it, bye" without posting any hints of what the solution was.
the issue was just a lack of hardware acceleration and using an external graphic card reduced the Xorg usage from %100 (everytime I drag a menu and move it around)to %30 in the same test condition.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.