LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


View Poll Results: Which one would you recommend ?
Slackware 23 57.50%
ArchLinux 12 30.00%
Anisha, Stop wasting our time !! 5 12.50%
Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-19-2010, 07:54 AM   #16
GazL
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 6,897

Rep: Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019

My advice: Try them both and see which suits you best.

Everyone's tastes are different and sometimes even the subtlest of aspects may put you off a distro. For me it was that Arch don't have a crypto-signing mechanism for their packages.
 
Old 05-19-2010, 07:55 AM   #17
bret381
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Location: Alabama
Distribution: Arch x86_64
Posts: 650

Rep: Reputation: 79
I have used both and I like both very well. I do like pacman and have chosen to stick with Arch over the last several months anyway, but I still boot up Slackware every once in a while. If you do not have an internet connection, I'd go with Slackware. It's a great OS and it's very stable. You can always download packages from slackbuilds.org and save them to USB to install on your machine later. Just my 2 cents
 
Old 05-19-2010, 07:57 AM   #18
Aquarius_Girl
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,731

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 29

Rep: Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940
Thanks Gazl,

I knew some one would say so, but both these distros require huge amount of time to set up. That's why i preferred to know which one should i prefer to start with.

And i do want to start LFS soon, will my choice of arch or slack effect it ?
 
Old 05-19-2010, 07:59 AM   #19
Aquarius_Girl
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,731

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 29

Rep: Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940
Quote:
Originally Posted by bret381 View Post
If you do not have an internet connection, I'd go with Slackware. It's a great OS and it's very stable. You can always download packages from slackbuilds.org and save them to USB to install on your machine later. Just my 2 cents
Thanks, but i was attracted towards Arch as it doesn't have even a GUI installed by default, it would have proved to be a great learning curve !
 
Old 05-19-2010, 07:59 AM   #20
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware64 15; SlackwareARM-current (aarch64); Debian 12
Posts: 8,299
Blog Entries: 61

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Everything's included. All you have to do is run, as root:
Code:
installpkg vlc-1.0.6-i486-1alien.tgz
That applies to any Slackware package, installpkg filename. Easy, huh?
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-19-2010, 08:00 AM   #21
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware64 15; SlackwareARM-current (aarch64); Debian 12
Posts: 8,299
Blog Entries: 61

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by anishakaul View Post
Thanks, but i was attracted towards Arch as it doesn't have even a GUI installed by default, it would have proved to be a great learning curve !
Slackware boots by default into runlevel 3, no X, no GUI.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-19-2010, 08:00 AM   #22
Aquarius_Girl
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,731

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 29

Rep: Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianL
Everything's included. All you have to do is run, as root: Everything's included. All you have to do is run, as root:
Code:

installpkg vlc-1.0.6-i486-1alien.tgz
Thanks brian, that was a relief !

Can't do such things in Arch ?

Last edited by Aquarius_Girl; 05-19-2010 at 08:02 AM.
 
Old 05-19-2010, 08:03 AM   #23
Aquarius_Girl
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,731

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 29

Rep: Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940
Ok it means learning Linux will be same irrespective of whether i install arch or slack ??
 
Old 05-19-2010, 08:03 AM   #24
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware64 15; SlackwareARM-current (aarch64); Debian 12
Posts: 8,299
Blog Entries: 61

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I've never tried Arch (yet), but it is a rolling release, which means more dependent on a constant internet connection. Try dual-booting both of them, eh?
 
Old 05-19-2010, 08:06 AM   #25
Aquarius_Girl
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,731

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 29

Rep: Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940Reputation: 940
Offtopic:

I am not a native english speaker:
Do words like "huh" and "eh" denote scarsism ?
 
Old 05-19-2010, 08:12 AM   #26
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware64 15; SlackwareARM-current (aarch64); Debian 12
Posts: 8,299
Blog Entries: 61

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by anishakaul View Post
[B] both these distros require huge amount of time to set up.
I've never actually timed it, but installing Slack doesn't take long.
 
Old 05-19-2010, 08:16 AM   #27
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware64 15; SlackwareARM-current (aarch64); Debian 12
Posts: 8,299
Blog Entries: 61

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by anishakaul View Post
Offtopic:

I am not a native english speaker:
Do words like "huh" and "eh" denote scarsism ?
No, not sarcasm.
Huh? and Eh? = Don't you think so? (more or less). Or:
Eh? = I can't believe you just said that.
Depends on context.

Last edited by brianL; 05-19-2010 at 08:18 AM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-19-2010, 08:21 AM   #28
GazL
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 6,897

Rep: Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019Reputation: 5019
Quote:
Originally Posted by anishakaul View Post
Thanks Gazl,

I knew some one would say so, but both these distros require huge amount of time to set up. That's why i preferred to know which one should i prefer to start with.


Actually, Slack doesn't take as much effort as you might think.
 
Old 05-19-2010, 08:58 AM   #29
bret381
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Location: Alabama
Distribution: Arch x86_64
Posts: 650

Rep: Reputation: 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by anishakaul View Post
Thanks Gazl,

I knew some one would say so, but both these distros require huge amount of time to set up.
Slackware is relatively quick to install and setup. Arch does take time to get your DE running etc. The actual install to your CLI doesn't take very long at all though
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-19-2010, 09:02 AM   #30
posixculprit
Member
 
Registered: May 2010
Posts: 136

Rep: Reputation: 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by GazL View Post
Actually, Slack doesn't take as much effort as you might think.
It does if you're not planning on performing full installs and would like just the "base system" (AAA or somesuch? haven't used Slackware in a while) + programs you directly use and their dependencies.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BSD versus Slackware lstamm Slackware 20 12-01-2009 02:04 PM
[SOLVED] 'route' versus 'inet_route': Slackware-12.0 rshepard Slackware 6 10-23-2007 03:40 PM
Slackware Current versus Slackware 10.2 davimint Slackware 3 07-26-2006 03:52 PM
Minislack versus Slackware Grongle Slackware 7 04-09-2006 12:56 AM
Gentoo versus Slackware kaon Slackware 17 07-21-2004 10:00 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration