Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have now installed a new systemdisc that i have the following partitions on:
Primary partition 1: Linux ext2 Start Cyl:0 End Cyl:792
Primary partition 2: ntfs Start Cyl:792 End Cyl:1849
Primary logic:
Logical 1: ext2 Start Cyl:1849 End Cyl:2112
Logical 2: swap Start Cyl: 2113 End Cyl: 2179
Logical 3: Ntfs Start Cyl:2180 End Cyl: 10336
When i add the primary ntfs partition to my lilo.conf it fails.
Do i only use my primary ext2 partition, then everything works just fine.
But i need the dualboot.
The error i get from lilo when i add the primary ntfs partition is this:
Ignoring entry 'lba32'
Device 0x0300: Invalid partition table, 2nd entry
3D adress: 1/96/792 (804384)
Linear adress: 1/0/11886 (11981088)
I have also tried with lba32 and without lba32.
Also tried lilo -L.
Originally posted by EddieX Primary partition 1: Linux ext2 Start Cyl:0 End Cyl:792
Primary partition 2: ntfs Start Cyl:792 End Cyl:1849
Should your NTFS partition really start on cylinder 792 or should this say 793? If it really is 792 I'm wondering if your ext2 partition has overwritter the start of your ntfs partition, hence the invalid partition tables.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.