|
dosfsck vs. chkdsk: any need for chkdsk in a dual boot scenario?
My question is whether or not there is any advantage to using chkdsk instead of dosfsck for a FAT(16/32) partition. This is in the context of a dual boot scenario where the partition to be checked is shared between Linux and Windows.
Thus far, in my experience, they pretty much do the same thing but dosfsck is a lot quicker. So at this point it seems to me that chkdsk would only be necessary for NTFS partitions.
I'm interested to see what others think on this issue.
|
