Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
felt that mandrake was a blessing at first... then plunged into debian. good thing about debian... nice and lightweight, only contains the stuff u want... none of the i'll just include it for u in Mandrake (but granted this actually helps newbies!)
well went on to rh7.0 coz wanted to try the seemingly most well known distro... had some problems, plugged rh7.2 in again just to give it another go. found it nice.
Aside from me in the US, Slack does seem to have a good Aus. following. That'd be a great poll. Find out what people use compaired to where they live..hmm
hey, i actually put up a where are you from poll in the general forum the other night...
but i use redhat and slackware and i live in texas... but i think since slackware 8 install.. its gonna be my distro of choice since i like the more unix type distro anyways... studying to get my sun solaris certs now..
LOL Poor winmodems. I think there is a flame I mean support group for those stuck with these things. The trash is a good place to start when trying to get one to work in Linux...
Slack-On!!
I started with Slackware run slowly on a pc with only 4MB of ram. Now use Redhat. Use version 7.0 on main pc and 7.2 for testing on this one. Points to note 7.0 has flaky compiled updated to later gcc. Also use journaling fs. I use Reiserfs through not standard with 7.0. 7.2 comed with ext3. Well thats my story.
I am thinking I might try Slackware properly over the Christmas break. I seem to be installing everything from source anyway, which doesn't update the local RPM-files database (I presume that's how RPM keeps track of the files) so when I do use RPM to install, there's always lots of dependancy problems - even though there aren't! Hmm, I'll give it a go.
I installed redhat 7.2 yesterday and had no problems. The cable modem works fine, the printer installed with no problems. I am having the typical newbie problems, but I cannot complain about the installation
I use Mandrake (yes i'm an Australian, but I haven't tried Slack yet, maybe soon, but i'm on dialup (but if I can get adsl without a 3gb cap, damn Telstra)...
my first Linux experiences were with Redhat 6.0
I couldn't really install the thing until I discovered how to partition my drive.....
then I tried Mandrake 7.2. Made Linux seem way easier....
now I'm using Mandrake 8.0, and it rules
tried Redhat 7.1, but I liked Mandrake better for some reason (the graphical LILO was more eye pleasing, and I liked automount).....
Distribution: all.. but mainly SuSe--- looks like it changing to Red Hat
Posts: 119
Rep:
I would like to put in 3 more votes for SuSE.. I use 3 SuSE boxes at home, and one at work.. on a regular bases..
Out of all the distros I've used.. SuSe 6.1+, Mandrake 6.0+, Red Hat 6.0+, and Caldera 2.4 & 3.1. ( I do software testing on all these plus HP-UX, Solaris, AIX, Novell , and Windows.. which is why I love Linux..)
I would say mandrake had the upper hand in the install on pre ver 7 releases on SuSE & Red Hat, .. of SuSE vs RedHat .. pre Ver 7.. Red Hat was better... Now Caldera.. it was their with a great install (some times).. but it seem to me it stopped their...
With now with SuSE, Mandrake, & Red Hat all above ver. 7.0.. I don't really see one being better than the other on install.. their all pretty much the same. I do custom installs on my 3 boxes at home and 1 box at work.. but do default install on the 10 lab boxes at work (all can hold 3 Linux distros and 2 Windows..)
So with the (1) default install in mind & with (2) current versions and for a (3) .. I would say the order would be Mandrake, Red Hat , Caldera, ... and then SuSE.. ( I still think SuSE rules !!) But their all so close, it is like distinguishing purple and violet.
Tried Red$haft , (as a newbie) Couldnt get it to go, downloaded Suse and I got it up and running without even knowing how the heck I did it. Been with suse ever since. My only complaint is that they raised their prices to match Red$shaft!
Well I've been using RedHat for a few years, and really like it. But Last nite I did an install of Slack on my laptop, and I gotta say it went really smooth, and I got everything that i use to work, slack impressed me with how fast is compared to redhat on my laptop. So I might switch over my other to computers running redhat 7.2 to slack 8. I was worried that it was gonna be hard to make the trans over to slack, but i found that having some experience with solaris helped out. And the install wasnt as big of a nightmare that people make it out to be.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.