LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-08-2002, 10:33 PM   #16
Anjan
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: New York
Distribution: Redhat 9
Posts: 7

Rep: Reputation: 0
Unhappy RedHat 8 has missed some important stuff


After using Redhat 8 with great anticipation for the last week, this is the conclusion I have come to - it needs to refine itself quite a bit before it can be considered a serious contender to either Windows XP or MacOS X. Let me elaborate why -

I am not a KDE or GNOME purist so I have no problems with Redhat changing the desktop to simplify the interface for the end-user. In fact, I think that such a step is required by some vendor(s) to help Linux take the next step. I think that is the only right step Redhat took with their latest distro. Otherwise, it looks like a hurriedly put together distribution, totally ignoring important suggestions by Linux fans.

Take for example their "simplified" menu. I am still confused by what program is categorized under what menu. Maybe their intentions were noble, but they should have put more work behind trying to consolidate/simply KDE/GNOME menus.

Some functionalities that are considered seamless because of how WinXP and MacOS handle it, are poorly implemented in RH8 -

1. After I had installed ALL components in Sound & Video, I could not play mpegs off of a web site. Not cool

2. Even though my hardware listing showed that the system had detected my HP Photosmart printer, I had to physically create a queue and install the driver. Too much work.... But even after that when I printed a page, I got gobbledegook. Right about now, I was losing my faith in the new "Windows Killer".

3. RH8 supposedly has a great Package Manager similar to the Add/Remove programs in Windows but I could not see any of the programs I installed in that list like Opera, Forte, etc. Now, that isn't ANY help at all to have just the system components listed in that.

I wouldn't say the whole OS was a loss. It shows a lot of promise and is certainly the best distro from RH to date, but it certainly would have been significantly better if they had listened to RH supporters or other vendors like Mandrake and SuSe who have a better pulse on what makes a better desktop. I think I'll try out Mandrake 9 and see how it feels.

Anjan
http://www.synergistics.net/conan_sm.jpg
 
Old 10-08-2002, 11:59 PM   #17
masinick
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Greenville, SC
Distribution: Debian, antiX, MX Linux
Posts: 636
Blog Entries: 16

Rep: Reputation: 104Reputation: 104
General concensus around the 'net seems to be that Red Hat 8.0 is a very good distro and it works well, except in one area - multimedia support, an area in which it seems to be weak. I installed Limbo and NULL Beta releases, and I'm awaiting shipment of a newer version. I think it is a very good release, overall, but I do think that it misses the pulse of the consumer market. Apparently that is not the current target market. I think that Red Hat 8.0 makes a good choice as an overall system, and the desktop software is useful for business desktop systems. For the general consumer market,either Mandrake or SuSE make better choices among the major distros,and Lycoris Desktop/LX makes a great, simple desktop system. I happen to like Lycoris Desktop/LX for simple tasks, Mandrake as an easy to configure, extensible choice, and Libranet as my do anything choice. I tend to use Lycoris during the week and either Mandrake or Libranet on the weekends or when I'm testing out software.

Last edited by masinick; 10-09-2002 at 09:08 AM.
 
Old 10-09-2002, 02:10 AM   #18
rohang
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Distribution: Redhat, Open BSD, SuSe, Debian, CentOS
Posts: 177

Rep: Reputation: 31
If you're not happy with the choice of KDE or Gnome, try another window manager.

I personally use WindowMaker www.windowmaker.org and the RPM is on the RedHat CDs for those who don't want to install from source.
 
Old 10-09-2002, 06:52 AM   #19
annehoog
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Nederland
Distribution: RH 8 Psyche and Debian Woody
Posts: 373

Rep: Reputation: 32
I'm curious: did everybody make a fresh install or did some of you update your system?
I would like to know what the experiences with updating from 7.3 to 8 are.

Anne
 
Old 10-09-2002, 09:15 AM   #20
Linuxidiot
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx
Distribution: RedHat 8.0
Posts: 70

Rep: Reputation: 15
I did a fresh install seeing as I screwed up7.3 anyhow
 
Old 10-09-2002, 09:21 AM   #21
annehoog
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Nederland
Distribution: RH 8 Psyche and Debian Woody
Posts: 373

Rep: Reputation: 32
I hope it works ok now?

Anne
 
Old 10-09-2002, 09:28 AM   #22
Linuxidiot
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx
Distribution: RedHat 8.0
Posts: 70

Rep: Reputation: 15
yea ive installed 8.0 a couple of times heh i tried updating some drivers for an ati radeon from the DRI project page and screwed up xfree couldnt get it fixed so i re-installed then after four hours of re-installing and editing lilo & grub i finally figured out duh! i was editting the wrong line in lilo the entire time thats why it wouldnt boot into LILO :-\ oh well im up and running now even installed the mp3 plugin for xmms before finally going to bed heh
 
Old 10-09-2002, 05:17 PM   #23
thanko
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: MI
Distribution: Slackware 9.1
Posts: 83

Rep: Reputation: 15
Finally got the Palm conduits set up. Found the answer in the comp.os.linux.redhat newsgroup. Run this from the command line:

gpilotd-control-applet --cap-id=1
 
Old 10-09-2002, 05:35 PM   #24
scott.houston
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Unhappy MPEG support.

I believe that MPEG support was pulled because somebody started yelling about licensing/patent/copyright/some-such-nonsense. Bummer if this is true.
 
Old 10-09-2002, 05:45 PM   #25
kmistry
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2002
Distribution: Debian 3.0 (Sid)
Posts: 67

Rep: Reputation: 15
In my opinion i think RH is trying to aim towards bringin in the windows users, and making linux compatible to THEM. not good in my opinion. instead bring windows users to linux.....dont dumb down what could be a great OS just to bring in some windows users to the linux side. i prefer mandrake and im downloading 9.0 right now, (if its good ill prolly go out and buy it, its cheaper than paying mandarke membership if i want 2 support them, and i got em on disc)

mandrake has some newbish stuff thats good but later its very configurable, most of the configs are still there and are ready to be used, WHILST they have easy to use newbie features and docs. what i especailly like is the mandrake control panel, if anything thats the only feature from windows that i actually like.
 
Old 10-09-2002, 08:06 PM   #26
bxb32001
Member
 
Registered: May 2001
Location: Beijing
Distribution: Fedora, Knoppix
Posts: 204

Rep: Reputation: 30
I started using Linux around RH 7.1, and I thought 7.3 was quite okay. I'm just starting to learn Linux, and I'm doing so at a slow pace - as a hobby since I' m working.

Anyway, aside from the it's cuteness (I think it's also a bit more stable and a bit snappier than 7.3), I think Red Hat dropped the ball on 8.0. The menus are confusing (I wouldn't call it simplified), and it lacks of multimedia support - even more frustrating. I was hoping this release will be the ONE (a la Matrix).

I am speaking as an average user. And at work, I use both Macs and PCs. I have flipped back and forth between Win2k and RH in my home computer and it's current life as a Linux box has been it's longest one. I had resolved to be a bit more patient and try to learn as much as I could when I can. I admit, my resolve is starting to falter... I now accept the fact that in the end, computers are tools and what matters is to get things done....

[Sigh] Seems I must travel back to Dagobah and seek Yoda's advice on this one.... [Patience, you must have....]
 
Old 10-12-2002, 08:42 PM   #27
bupernfut
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Distribution: Red Hat 8.0
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
THANK YOU!!!

Thanko: I really appreciate you posting the conduit info.

<sarcasm> I guess I really should have known that one ... probably right in the Red Hat 8 docs. </sarcasm>
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Red Hat custom Kernel compilation mini-How-To for Red Hat 8-9 Thetargos Red Hat 431 04-13-2007 05:19 AM
Red Hat does not plan to release another product in the red hat linux line... Whitehat General 5 11-03-2003 06:33 PM
Red Hat Enterprise vs. Red Hat Linux Project RedHatMN Linux - Distributions 2 07-29-2003 04:16 AM
Red Hat 7.3 Released jeremy Linux - Distributions 14 06-18-2002 02:00 PM
Red Hat 7.2... & a modem with Red Hat 7.1 driver support rahduku Linux - Distributions 1 02-14-2002 11:49 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration