Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
|
03-13-2024, 12:17 PM
|
#16
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2019
Location: Esbjerg
Distribution: Windows 7...
Posts: 773
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by finalizer
All distros that I know are either the whole stable and not latest or the whole rolling/latest and less stable.
|
I know of one rolling release that's remarkable stable, if you follow the changelog you'll notice the lack of reverts... over the years I think only two or three minor ones occured?
But have a look for yourself https://www.linuxquestions.org/quest...nt-4175698890/
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
03-14-2024, 07:12 AM
|
#17
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2024
Posts: 22
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jan K.
|
I could agree that Slackware is generally a good Linux distribution. However I'm not sure Slackware-current is stable enough. At least in the FreeBSD project (where Slackware inherited many concepts from) the FreeBSD-CURRENT development branch means unstable.
Could you check what was the situation in Slackware-current at 2013 when kernel 3.11.0 introduced a critical regression in one of its network drivers that can make the whole system stuck without network or constantly crashing?
This is what happened in Arch at that time https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/36865
Last edited by finalizer; 03-14-2024 at 07:16 AM.
|
|
|
03-14-2024, 02:15 PM
|
#18
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2019
Location: Esbjerg
Distribution: Windows 7...
Posts: 773
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by finalizer
... I'm not sure Slackware-current is stable enough.
|
Check the -current changelog for regressions and roll-backs...
Quote:
Originally Posted by finalizer
Could you check...
|
Nah, couldn't care less.
|
|
|
05-01-2024, 03:30 PM
|
#19
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 11,352
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by finalizer
Could you check what was the situation in Slackware-current at 2013 when kernel 3.11.0 introduced a critical regression in one of its network drivers that can make the whole system stuck without network or constantly crashing?
|
I was using slackware-current at the time and I have no idea what you’re talking about.
If the critical regression was as well-known as you claim, then what obviously would have happened is that the distro maintainer noticed, and did not change the kernel to the obviously buggy version. You know, just as distro maintainers today didn't update xz-utils to the hacked version, and the ones that did have reverted it.
Last edited by dugan; 05-01-2024 at 08:24 PM.
|
|
|
05-01-2024, 03:35 PM
|
#20
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 11,352
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by finalizer
Maybe I didn't explain my question well enough. It's not about mutability of the base system but about how package maintainers do their job. Packages of the base system need to be solid stable and receive only minor updates related to stability and security, i.e. no new functionality until the next major release of the whole distro. In contrast all other packaged software is latest, released with a minimum delay after the upstream, i.g. it's rolling.
|
Debian. With FlatPaks.
I know this wasn’t what you wanted to hear, but it’s the answer and you need to swallow this pill.
Last edited by dugan; 05-01-2024 at 03:37 PM.
|
|
|
05-02-2024, 02:38 AM
|
#21
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Mar 2016
Location: Harrow, UK
Distribution: LFS, AntiX, Slackware
Posts: 8,140
|
I think you're looking for a BSD, not Linux. BSD systems have an integrated core (kernel, shell, basic libraries and Unix utilities) that only gets updated as a unit, and then you add your applications separately. And in a really traditional BSD, you build those locally from source, though modern BSDs use prebuilt packages as an alternative.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:02 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|