Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
|
12-19-2016, 03:45 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2016
Posts: 25
Rep: 
|
Looking for stable, rock solid, distro...
hi !
as title says i am looking for a stable distribution, i'm going to erase two partitions with unstable distros, wanna this new year to start with 'stability' ...
thanks in advance !
ps i have right now Debian Stable on my first partition
|
|
|
12-19-2016, 03:48 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2006
Location: Detroit, MI
Distribution: GNU/Linux systemd
Posts: 4,278
|
What kind of stable distribution? Desktop or server?
Do you mean that you want long term support or a distro known to be reliable?
|
|
|
12-19-2016, 04:49 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2015
Location: Where ever needed
Distribution: Slackware/Salix while testing others
Posts: 1,718
|
Slackware or SalixOS
|
|
|
12-19-2016, 05:26 PM
|
#4
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2016
Posts: 25
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
^
mmm ... aint sure bout slack and derivatives ...

|
|
2 members found this post helpful.
|
12-19-2016, 05:31 PM
|
#5
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2016
Posts: 25
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Desktop,
reliable or long term no matter . . .
|
|
|
12-19-2016, 07:58 PM
|
#6
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu MATE, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 20,014
|
Since you are already using Debain, the two other most stable distros I've used have been Slackware and Mageia.
|
|
|
12-19-2016, 08:18 PM
|
#7
|
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian, EndeavourOS, OpenSUSE, KDE Neon
Posts: 4,031
|
All listed are extremely stable. Slackware will teach you the most about managing your system, but if you're the type that doesn't want to have to constantly administer, just wants to install and use it as if it's basically an appliance, Slackware IMO is a very poor choice.
Debian has the largest repositories, and will give you great stability, but generally tends to be REALLY old software (you can enable backports to get some of the most popular software more modern). Debian you will get systemd though, if you care.
Mageia is...well, it's a GOOD distro, but nothing really shines about it to me. It's stable, but no moreso than Slack or Debian. It's got far less software in it's repos than Debian. But they do a much better job of packaging their desktops of choice default settings than Debian does IMO, if you don't want to have to customize EVERYTHING just to get to decent defaults.
|
|
|
12-19-2016, 09:42 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2006
Location: Detroit, MI
Distribution: GNU/Linux systemd
Posts: 4,278
|
I've used Arch exclusively on the home computers for a few years now. It is very stable. I have had one instance where I did an update and the machine had a poo - back when we converted the repositories to use gpg signing.
However, Arch is an expert/intermediate level system that can be complicated to set up and configure and administer if you are not sure what you are doing.
This is why I was wondering if you were looking for a long term stable distro, or an easy to use distro, or something like that.
|
|
|
12-20-2016, 06:52 AM
|
#9
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2016
Posts: 25
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by szboardstretcher
This is why I was wondering if you were looking for a long term stable distro, or an easy to use distro, or something like that.
|
hi szboard...
what happened with Mint ? Mintdebian ? ? Centos ? ? ? opensuse leap ? ? ? ? blahblahblah ...
Linux IS NOT only buntus, slack, debian or arch !
|
|
|
12-20-2016, 10:25 AM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Distribution: Mageia 7 - Debian 10 - Artix Linux
Posts: 1,142
|
A few stable & solid distros, some mention already.
Debian Jessie (Stable)
SalixOS - Slackware based but user friendly
Mageia 5 is current stable version but they are working on Mga 6, coming soon.
Q4OS - Debian based with DE of Trinity based on KDE3
|
|
|
12-20-2016, 11:21 AM
|
#11
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2016
Posts: 25
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Last edited by paranoid_penguin; 12-20-2016 at 11:47 AM.
|
|
|
12-20-2016, 10:08 PM
|
#12
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2016
Posts: 25
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
... no more opinions ... :emoyawn:
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
12-21-2016, 10:40 AM
|
#13
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: PCLinuxOS, Salix
Posts: 6,268
|
The annual survey of websites shows that those servers which will identify their OS tend to be split between Debian Stable and CentOS. Slackware is as reliable, but not popular in the enterprise because it doesn't come with auto-installation. So that's it:
Debian Stable: you've got it
CentOS: the KDE version would make a nice change to Debian
Slackware: get Salix. 100% compatible, more ready-to-run software and user-friendliness, and very reliable Xfce desktop
As for the others, many are very nice (I like PCLinuxOS and Manjaro) but they have not been subjected to anything like the rigorous testing that the others have. You asked for stable, and that's what we gave you!
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
12-21-2016, 10:45 AM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2006
Location: Detroit, MI
Distribution: GNU/Linux systemd
Posts: 4,278
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by paranoid_penguin
hi szboard...
what happened with Mint ? Mintdebian ? ? Centos ? ? ? opensuse leap ? ? ? ? blahblahblah ...
Linux IS NOT only buntus, slack, debian or arch !
|
Nothing happened to them. You obviously know about them already. I talk about the ones I use and know. Blah blah.
|
|
|
12-21-2016, 10:46 AM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2006
Location: Detroit, MI
Distribution: GNU/Linux systemd
Posts: 4,278
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by paranoid_penguin
... no more opinions ... :emoyawn:
|
There is also Red Hat if you want a supported stable system.
And the BSD family is good and stable as well. Especially FreeBSD and openBSD.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|