LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-25-2011, 02:39 AM   #1
chrisleeuk
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Question light distro with adobe flash support?


hi people I'm a die hard windows user but I'm not narrow minded.

I have an old ibm thinkpad that was running xp and badly in need of a reinstall (r50e) with 256 Ram.

I thought to myself netbooks often run linux so maybe I should give it a try.

This is for the kid's to play on so it needs adobe flash support and a basic browser.

I already tried vector linux and puppy Linux. I was very impressed with the speed and instant hardware detection.

Problem is whatever browser I try crashes or closes as soon as a page with. flash loads.

I tried disabling hardware acceleration in the adobe plugin as suggested by other posts but that made only a minor difference.

disabling the flash plugin fixed it in firefox but then no fun for the kids.

I know flash is poor but kids sites usr it in spades.

so any suitable distros or is it back to xp?

Last edited by chrisleeuk; 06-25-2011 at 02:42 AM. Reason: missed question
 
Old 06-25-2011, 03:35 AM   #2
craigevil
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: OZ
Distribution: Debian Sid/RPIOS
Posts: 4,885
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 533Reputation: 533Reputation: 533Reputation: 533Reputation: 533Reputation: 533
Give Debian a try, use either a lightweight DE like lxde or a window manager like openbox, icewm, fluxbox etc. And try using Google Chrome or Chromium from the normal Debian repos.

I am running Debian sid on a Thinkpad R40, but I put in 1GB ram so I could use KDE4.
 
Old 06-25-2011, 06:30 AM   #3
MTK358
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,443
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723
Mint comes with Flash pre-installed, and is available with minimalist desktops pre-installed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by craigevil View Post
Give Debian a try
I tried installing Flash in Debian once, and it was horribly difficult, and still worked in only one browser in ther end. I would not recommend it whatsoever.
 
Old 06-25-2011, 10:36 AM   #4
craigevil
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: OZ
Distribution: Debian Sid/RPIOS
Posts: 4,885
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 533Reputation: 533Reputation: 533Reputation: 533Reputation: 533Reputation: 533
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK358 View Post
Mint comes with Flash pre-installed, and is available with minimalist desktops pre-installed.



I tried installing Flash in Debian once, and it was horribly difficult, and still worked in only one browser in ther end. I would not recommend it whatsoever.
Lol apt-get install flashplugin-nonfree using the normal Debian repos or
apt-get install flashplayer-mozilla from the dmm repo

Works in every browser I have ever had installed including: Seamonkey, Iceweasel, Firefox, Chrome, Midori, Uzbl, Netsurf, Opera. Not once in the seven years I have been running Debian have I had to do more than the above commands to get flash working.
 
Old 06-25-2011, 11:09 AM   #5
anomie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Distribution: RHEL, Scientific Linux, Debian, Fedora
Posts: 3,935
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisleeuk
I have an old ibm thinkpad that was running xp and badly in need of a reinstall (r50e) with 256 Ram.
Something to keep in mind on this endeavor: Flash is developed (and optimized) for Windows first, with everything else as an afterthought. With a low-end system like that, you may discover that even the lightest of distros give unacceptably poor Flash playback. (I'd be curious to know if you discover otherwise, in fact.)
 
Old 06-25-2011, 11:33 AM   #6
snowday
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,667

Rep: Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411
Like all reputable software vendors, Adobe has published hardware requirements for Flash:

www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/systemreqs/

For Linux the recommend minimums are:

Intel Pentium 4 2.33GHz, AMD Athlon 64 2800+ or faster processor (or equivalent)
512MB of RAM
128MB of graphics memory (maybe you can get away with only 64mb if you're not planning to watch hi-def)
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-27-2011, 02:08 PM   #7
Ahau
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: USA
Distribution: Porteus, Slackware
Posts: 58

Rep: Reputation: 19
You could give Porteus a try. It's a live distro, though, so try it on a CD first, and if it works you can do a 'frugall' install to your hd. Might be good for the kids that way, because they won't be able to wreck the system as easily. It comes with KDE Trinity and LXDE (which might be better with your low RAM), firefox and flash.
 
Old 07-12-2011, 06:29 PM   #8
exoshwarze
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Distribution: I am an avid distro-hopper . I like Arch and Pardus .
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I ran Crunchbang on my obsolete laptop for a while, and I found it very sexy and loved it if not for apt-get and synaptic . (They seem unable to ever properly uninstall programs and I find myself having to conform to what Debian wants on my computer ..)

Now it happily runs Arch . A bit tricky to install, but the end product has what you want on it and is lightning-fast .

It IS my guinea pig so I will probably soon be playing around with various distros on it . But all in all, Crunchbang and Arch are good for older hardware . Crunchbang ships with flash, and in Arch you simply configure your video card (not as hard as it sounds) and do a "pacman -S flashplugin" .

As for a lightweight browser, try iceweasel or midori . ;]

Good luck . ^^

Last edited by exoshwarze; 07-12-2011 at 06:31 PM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Looking for an light weight distro with LVM volume management support. xweb Linux - Distributions 1 05-18-2009 12:53 AM
Looking for an light weight distro with LVM volume management support. xweb Linux - General 1 05-17-2009 12:17 AM
Need a very light distro with hermes/orinoco 802.11b support mrd Linux - General 9 01-18-2007 08:02 PM
adobe flash support on PPC rwbarat Linux - Software 0 01-10-2007 07:42 PM
Is Adobe phasing out Linux Flash support? mark_alfred General 24 05-30-2006 10:55 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration