GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Flash 8.0 and 9.0 are not available for Linux. You can give feedback to the Adobe-Macromedia development team at Adobe Wish Form
While I don't know what Adobe is up to, it is worthwhile to note that many of the changes made from one flash player version to the next are not supported by all platforms, or rather, Adobe doesn't write support for it. They go where the majority of the market is. It would be utterly foolhardy to phase out Linux Flash, but keeping it a few versions behind saves on development costs for a platform that still has under 10% user base (I'm going to start a statistics war with that one). As another example, flash for the Pocket PC is still on version 6.
On another note, it would be nice to see Flash phased out altogether. What is the purpose of Web standards, or even the Web at all, if we are beholden to the proprietary garbage that is Flash?
On another note, it would be nice to see Flash phased out altogether. What is the purpose of Web standards, or even the Web at all, if we are beholden to the proprietary garbage that is Flash?
As a web designer, I would say that it depends highly on how flash is used. It is not meant to, or indeed capable of, supplanting the web languages. If we wish to ditch flash because it is proprietary, then we should ditch .mp3, .mov, .wmv, and a score of other plugin formats that make the web media-rich.
What would be really interesting is to see SVG and other web methods pushed to the point where flash becomes outmoded...
As a web designer, I would say that it depends highly on how flash is used. It is not meant to, or indeed capable of, supplanting the web languages. If we wish to ditch flash because it is proprietary, then we should ditch .mp3, .mov, .wmv, and a score of other plugin formats that make the web media-rich.
I mostly dislike flash for its extreme low quality(the player/plugin) and speed. The huge amount of websites that are almost entirely in Flash are sadly still growing and by all means annoying. IMO their all crap and I will always keep avoiding them as much as possible.
Its settled then. From this day forth sites should use SMIL to display animated content. Browsers will come with native integrated cross platform SMIL players.
I tried to go to a commercial site the other day and there was NOTHING there except the notice that I needed flash player 8. No contact, nothing.
Ok, it's my computer, no problem.
So I tried from work, apparantly they aren't concerned with updating that much, no problem, it's not necessary for work.
And so, I haven't bought anything from them.
I actually have flash 8 semi-working through cross-over plugin. Most movies have no problem playing. Places like youtube and myspace have no trouble. The problem is some sites seem go the extra step in detection. i.e www.comcast.net
Distribution: Ubuntu Linux 16.04, Debian 10, LineageOS 14.1
Posts: 1,572
Original Poster
Rep:
14: The comcast one worked for me. Here's a site that did not: site someone linked in an odd chatroom I belong to. Disclaimer: I have no idea what is being portrayed there, besides a message for me to get Flash Player # 8.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.