Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Right now the laptop is equipped with Windows XP Pro,and I wanted to try linux on it. Doing some research it sounds like I would be best suited with either Ubuntu or Suse Linux.
I've tried both live cd's and liked them both alot.
Basically my requirements for a distro are
Hardware support, my laptop is pretty well support by linux so this isn't really an issue. But I do have a need for a smart card reader (the laptop has a built in one and I have a usb powered one) one of the two must work.
Usage: I already use Open office, and from what I understand Microsoft office works through either wine or crossover. I do some media encoding (Ripping dvds to my hard drive then burning fair use copies)
Games: I play a fair amount of Steam platform games (Half life series, Plants vs Zombies, Audio Surf, Portal) Some console Emulators, and some iD games.
From doing my research and using the live cds of the two, Suse felt a lot more polished, maybe slightly sluggish (I suspect that was the live cd) but I have heard RPM based distros are harder to learn to use than a Deb based but this could of course be a bias bit of information.
Any real unbias input would be great but I am expecting a lot of "My distro is better than yours"
I doubt you will see my distro is better than yours. We have many threads like that. It is all linux and anyway you look at it there is a reason why Slackware is the oldest fastest most stable distribution their is.
I test bed many distro's I bought my Girl friend the same laptop and she had 5 distro's to use she played with them all and went with Slackware and puppy linux as a backup.
the only real learning curve was the bcm 4312 I cut the driver for her.
I think the debian and ubuntu distros are a little easier to set up you proprietary wifi card. just plug in the wired line and go to settings enable the hardware and let it install it.
but as far as stable and performance it is there. and if you want bleeding edge stuff slackware64-current Ubuntu daily build repo's and any of the FC stuff.
Now there are at least 50 other distro's I test but they have some sharper learning curves. Once you learn them you can stream line them to make them into high performance systems. good luck.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.