LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop
User Name
Password
Linux - Desktop This forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-12-2024, 11:01 AM   #1
schmolch
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2024
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
Screenshot to clipboard is very slow and might fail


I take a lot of screenshots to the clipboard and paste them into apps such as obsidian.

The larger the screenshot is the longer it takes and at a certain size (my display is 8k) there is a high probability of failure, as in there is nothing in the clipboard according to the clipboard manager in the xfce-panel.

For example taking a screenshot that covers 3/4 of my screen might take about 10 seconds on my ryzen 5700g (8 cores) with 64GB RAM. First it is single-core load but later all cores get busy.

Im running manjaro stable with the xfce-desktop and tried 3 different screenshot apps: xfce-screenshooter, gnome-screenshooter and shutter.
It's the same behaviour with all of them.

It seems to be the process of copying the screenshot to the clipboard that takes all this time and possibly fails. When i directly save or open the screenshot in any app it is instant and always works.

Has anyone ever experienced disappointment at the speed of which screenshots are copied to clipboard?
 
Old 03-13-2024, 04:38 PM   #2
mrmazda
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2016
Location: SE USA
Distribution: openSUSE 24/7; Debian, Knoppix, Mageia, Fedora, others
Posts: 5,810
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068Reputation: 2068
I always save screenshots to disk before use, so can't picture your use case. However, if you try your activity in some other DE you could narrow it down to whether or not XFCE is at fault. IceWM and TDE, where available, are among lighter weight DEs that don't require as much RAM or disk space as higher profile DEs, and shouldn't interfere with your XFCE configs.

Same goes for your DM. If you normally launch from LightDM, GDM or SDDM, try with startx, XDM or TDM instead.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: CopyQ Clipboard Manager for Keeping a Track of Clipboard History LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 05-14-2020 06:40 PM
[SOLVED] if [[ -n "$1" ]]; then FAIL FAIL FAIL rbees Programming 7 03-25-2015 02:39 PM
Squid Server Very Very Very Slow jatender Linux - Server 1 09-28-2007 11:44 PM
A very very very very big problem!! Elbryan Linux - Software 2 09-23-2005 05:56 AM
Lindows very very very slow jfi Linspire/Freespire 15 03-28-2004 09:06 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration