For heaven's sake... don't feel
depressed. (At least, not for long. "Three beers. Max. Then, no more until morning, and in any case,
no shots or chasers.")
Take your exam-results and pore over them very carefully. (You're
not "in school," so do
not pore over them
that way.) You went into the exam feeling confident of your knowledge, and yet, when presented by a set of challenges that were specifically crafted for your
education by others who have gone before you, "you fell into the pit."
Okay... "ouch." Yeah, I know. But this is professional (self-)education, and therefore,
that's why that pit is there. It was selected to be there, and artfully arranged squarely in (one of) your chosen path(s). And more to the point, that's why the so-called "pit" has a nice, cushy, padded floor. Exactly as its designers intended, you
bounced, with nothing more to show for it than a slightly-bruised ego and a little more experience. The good news is, you had that "experience" under safe and controlled conditions. Airplanes did not fall from the sky. It is not three o'clock in the morning.
Take the exercises and reverse-engineer them. Determine where the weaknesses (that you did not, until now, realize even
existed...) lie, and consider... "what
were the skills (which I obviously at the moment still lack), that the authors of this exam (and their reviewers) considered to be so-essential that they included them in this test? What were the scenarios that I mis-read? Why was I so
surprised that I stumbled, when I confidently expected not to?"
As I said, "no more three beers
... then
get to work." As any engineer will tell you, you learn much
more about things that did not go the way that you expected them to. You have, in fact, stumbled precisely into a
lesson that a substantial number of test-designers and test-reviewers consider it to be very, very important that you learn. Get busy. Discover what the lessons are, and make it your professional business to learn them.
Airplanes did not fall from the sky,
this time. It is not three o'clock in the morning,
this time. I'll bet that the people who designed that test can't say that.
You would do well to
restrain yourself from "simply asking other folks around the water-cooler 'what the right answers were.'" After all, that is not really the point.
Next time (and there will be a next time...), you won't have the water-cooler, and maybe next-time the screw-up will be
real. You need to be the one who comes away, not only with "the knowledge," but with the means to obtain it.
And as always: when you finish with the exam to your satisfaction, or even right now, please don't forget to send detailed
feeback to the test designers. Yeah, I'm serious. Stuff your bruised ego into your professional pocket, of course, and then, if you find that you've got
constructive, implementable suggestions, send them on to the right people through the proper channels.
(Hint: not "here.") Instructional design is much harder than it looks.